From Classical to Intuitionistic Probability

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 111-123

  Weatherson, Brian ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intuitionistic logic; Probability

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649395433     PISSN: 00294527     EISSN: 19390726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1082637807     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Christensen, D., “Dutch-book arguments depragmatized: Epistemic consistency for partial believers,” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 93 (1996), pp. 450-79.
2. Cohen, L. J., The Probable and the Provable, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1977.
3. Dempster, A. P., “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 38 (1967), pp. 325-39.
4. Harman, G., “Problems with probabilistic semantics,” pp. 243-47 in Developments in Semantics, edited by A. Orenstein and R. Stern, Haven, New York, 1984.
5. Hellman, G., “Bayes and beyond,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 64 (1997), pp. 191-221.
6. Howson, C., and P. Urbach, Scientific Reasoning, Open Court, La Salle, 1989.
7. Joyce, J. M., “A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 65 (1998), pp. 575-603.
8. Kaplan, M., Decision Theory as Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
9. Lewis, D., “Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probability II,” Philosophical Review, vol. 95 (1986), pp. 297-315.
10. Lewis, D., “Why conditionalise?,” pp. 403-407 in Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
11. Maher, P., Betting on Theories, Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction, and Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
12. Maher, P., “Depragmatized Dutch book arguments,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 64 (1997), pp. 291-305.
13. Morgan, C. G., and H. Leblanc, “Probabilistic semantics for intuitionistic logic,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 24 (1983), pp. 161-80.
14. Morgan, C., and E. Mares, “Conditionals, probability and non-triviality,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 24 (1995), pp. 455-67.
15. Morgan, C. G., and H. Leblanc, “Probability theory, intuitionism, semantics, and the Dutch book argument,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 24 (1983), pp. 289-304.
16. Paris, J. B., The Uncertain Reasoner’s Companion. A Mathematical Perspective, vol. 39 of Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
17. Ponsonnet, J.-M., “The best and the worst in G. L. S. Shackle’s decision theory,” pp. 169-96 in Uncertainty in Economic Thought, edited by E. Elgar, Cheltham, 1996.
18. Ramsey, F., “Truth and probability,” pp. 156-98 in The Foundations of Mathematics, edited by R. Braithwaite, Routledge, London, 1931.
19. Savage, L. J., The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1954.
20. Schmeidler, D., “Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity,” Econometrica, vol. 57 (1989), pp. 571-87.
21. Shackle, G., Expectation in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1949.
22. Shafer, G., A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976.
23. Shafer, G., “Constructive probability,” Synthese, vol. 48 (1981), pp. 1-60.
24. Teller, P., “Conditionalization and observation,” Synthese, vol. 26 (1973), pp. 218-58.
25. Zadeh, L. A., “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1 (1978), pp. 3-28.