Development of a standardized curriculum for teaching cystoscopic skills using a computer-based endourologic simulator

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 92-97

  Gettman, Matthew T ^b   Carter, Le ^a   Rangel, Laureano J ^a   Slezak, Jeffrey M ^a   Bergstralh, Eric J ^a   Krambeck, Amy E ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum, Cystoscopy, Education, Simulation, Training, Mannequin, simulator

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; CYSTOSCOPE; CYSTOSCOPY; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; STANDARDIZATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADULT; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULUM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STANDARD;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRICULUM; CYSTOSCOPY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANIKINS; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 67649391219     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181871c3e     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Wilhelm DM, Ogan K, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:675-681.
2. Chou DS, Abdelshehid C, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Comparison of results of virtual-reality simulator and training model for basic ureteroscopy training. J Endourol 2006;20:266-271.
3. Matsumoto ED, Pace KT, D'A Honey RJ. Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills. Int J Urol 2006;13:896-901.
4. Ogan K, Jacomides L, Shulman MJ, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver. J Urol 2004;172:667-671.
5. Jacomides L, Ogan K, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Use of a virtual reality simulator for ureteroscopy training. J Urol 2004;171:320-323.
6. Shah J, Montgomery B, Langley S, Darzi A. Validation of a flexible cystoscopy course. BJU Int 2002;90:833-835.
7. Shah J, Darzi A. Virtual reality flexible cystoscopy: a validation study. BJU Int 2002;90:828-832. (Pubitemid 36693613)
8. Sweet R, Kowalewski T, Oppenheimer P, Weghorst S, Satava R. Face, content, and construct validity of the University of Washington virtual reality transurethral resection of the prostate trainer. J Urol 2004;172: 1953-1957.
9. Le CQ, Lightner DJ, VanderLei L, Segura JW, Gettman MT. The current role of medical simulation in American urological residency training programs: an assessment by program directors. J Urol 2007; 177:288-291.
10. Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov NK, Hanna GB, Jakimowicz JJ. Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1523-1532.
11. Kneebone RL, Nestel D, Taylor P, Bann S, Munz Y, Darzi A. Learning the skills of flexible sigmoidoscopy-the wider perspective. Med Educ 2003;37(Suppl 1):50-58.
12. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005;39: 309-317.
13. Gettman MT, Le CQ, Rangel LJ, Slezak JM, Bargstralh J, Krambeck AE. Analysis of a computer-based simulator as an educational tool for cystoscopy: subjective and objective results. J Urol 2008;179: 267-271.