Discussion

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 123, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1828-1829

  Alderman, Amy K ^a,b   Chung, Kevin C ^a,b,c  

^a University of Michigan Health System ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FACE SURGERY; FACIAL REJUVENATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REJUVENATION; RELIABILITY; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; WELLBEING; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; RHYTIDOPLASTY;

COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REJUVENATION; RHINOPLASTY; RHYTIDOPLASTY;

EID: 67649389681     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a65c23     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Chung KC, Ram AN. Evidence-based medicine: The fourth revolution in American medicine? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123:389-398.
2. Chung KC, Rohrich RJ. Measuring surgical quality: Is it attainable? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:741-749.
3. The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (web site). Available at: http://www.nihpromis.org/ default.aspx. Accessed August 5, 2008.
4. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research (web site). Available at: http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/promis.asp. Accessed August 5, 2008.
5. Chung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, Hayward RA. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): Assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42: 619-622.
6. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testingofthe Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg (Am.) 1998;23:575-587.
7. Pusic AL, Reavey PL, Klassen AF, Scott A, McCarthy C, Cano SJ. Measuring patient outcomes in breast augmentation: Introducing the BREAST-Q Augmentation module. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:23-32.
8. National Cancer Institute. Outcomes Research (web site). Available at: http://outcomes.cancer.gov/aboutresearch/. Accessed July 28, 2008.
9. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Pap G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46: 87-92.
10. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335-341.
11. Feinstein A. Clinimetrics. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1987:180.
12. Dias JJ, Bhowal B, Wildin CJ, Thompson JR. Assessing the outcome of disorders of the hand: Is the patient evaluation measure reliable, valid, responsive and without bias? J Bone Joint Surg (Br.)w 2001;83:235-240.
13. Cohen J. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1983.