Robust supervised classification with mixture models: Learning from data with uncertain labels

Pattern Recognition

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2649-2658

  Bouveyron, Charles ^a   Girard, Stéphane ^b  

^a University Paris I Sorbonne Panthéon   (France)

^b INRIA RHÔNE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Data with uncertain labels; Label noise; Mixture models; Robustness; Supervised classification; Weakly supervised classification

Indexed keywords

DATA WITH UNCERTAIN LABELS; MIXTURE MODELS; ROBUSTNESS; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; WEAKLY SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFIERS; EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MIXTURES; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

LABELS;

EID: 67649389414     PISSN: 00313203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Banfield J., and Raftery A. Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics 49 (1993) 803-821
2. Bashir S., and Carter E. High breakdown mixture discriminant analysis. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 93 1 (2005) 102-111
3. Bellman R. Dynamic Programming (1957), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
4. Bensmail H., and Celeux G. Regularized Gaussian discriminant analysis through eigenvalue decomposition. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (1996) 1743-1748
5. Bouveyron C., Girard S., and Schmid C. High-dimensional data clustering. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52 1 (2007) 502-519
6. Bouveyron C., Kannala J., Schmid C., and Girard S. Object localization by subspace clustering of local descriptors. 5th Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, India (2006) 457-467
7. Brodley C., and Friedl M. Identifying mislabeled training data. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11 (1999) 131-167
8. Celeux G., and Govaert G. Parsimonious Gaussian models in cluster analysis. Pattern Recognition 28 (1995) 781-793
9. d'Alche Buc F., Dagan I., and Quinonero J. The 2005 Pascal visual object classes challenge. Proceedings of the 1st PASCAL Challenges Workshop (2006), Springer, Berlin
10. Dasarathy B. Noising around the neighbourhood: a new system structure and classification rule for recognition in partially exposed environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2 (1980) 67-71
11. Gamberger D., Lavrac N., and Groselj C. Experiments with noise filtering in a medical domain. 16th International Conference on Machine Learning, USA (1999) 143-151
12. Gates G. The reduced nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 18 3 (1972) 431-433
13. I. Guyon, N. Matic, V. Vapnik, Discovering informative patterns and data cleaning, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (1996) 181-203.
14. Hastie T., and Tibshirani R. Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 58 (1996) 155-176
15. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., and Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning (2001), Springer, New York
16. Hawkins D., and McLachlan G. High-breakdown linear discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92 437 (1997) 136-143
17. John G. Robust decision trees: removing outliers from databases. First conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (1995) 174-179
18. Lawrence N., and Schölkopf B. Estimating a kernel Fisher discriminant in the presence of label noise. Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (2001), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA 306-313
19. Li Y., Wessels L., de Ridder D., and Reinders M. Classification in the presence of class noise using a probabilistic kernel Fisher method. Pattern Recognition 40 12 (2007) 3349-3357
20. Lowe D. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60 2 (2004) 91-110
21. McLachlan G. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition (1992), Wiley, New York
22. Mikolajczyk K., and Schmid C. Scale and affine invariant interest point detectors. International Journal of Computer Vision 60 1 (2004) 63-86
23. Mingers J. An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Journal of Machine Learning 4 2 (1989) 227-243
24. Quinlan J. Bagging, boosting and C4.5. 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, USA (1996) 725-730
25. Rousseeuw P.J., and Leroy A. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection (1987), Wiley, New York
26. Sakakibara Y. Noise-tolerant occam algorithms and their applications to learning decision trees. Journal of Machine Learning 11 1 (1993) 37-62
27. Schapire R. The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning 5 (1990) 197-227
28. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6 (1978) 461-464
29. Vannoorenbergue P., and Denoeux T. Handling uncertain labels in multiclass problems using belief decision trees. Proceedings of IPMU'2002 (2002)
30. Wilson D., and Martinez T. Instance pruning techniques. 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, USA (1997) 404-411
31. Zeng X., and Martinez T. A noise filtering method using neural networks. IEEE International Workshop on Soft Computing Techniques in Instrumentation, Measurement and Related Applications (2003) 26-31
32. Zhu X., Wu X., and Chen Q. Eliminating class noise in large datasets. 20th ICML International Conference on Machine Learning, USA (2003) 920-927
33. Dempster A., Laird N., and Rubin D. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39 1 (1977) 1-38