A randomised trial of Conventional versus BAUS procedure-specific consent forms for transarethral resection of prostate

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 232-238

  Finch, William J G ^a   Rochester, Mark A ^a   Mills, Robert D ^a  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

BPH; Informed consent; TURP

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE TUMOR; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;

AGED; CONSENT FORMS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE;

EID: 67649386441     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588409X359277     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. General Medical Council. Seeking Patients' Consent: The Ethical Considerations. London: GMC, 1998.
2. Department of Health. Making amends: a consultation paper setting out the proposals for reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS. London: DH, 2003.
3. Department of Health. NHSLA report and accounts. London: DH, 2005.
4. Chester v Afshar. In UKHL 2004; 41.
5. Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, Williams JR, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent. Can Med Assoc J 1996; 155: 177-80.
6. Issa MM, Setzer E, Charqaf C, Webb AL, Derico R, Kimberl IJ et al. Informed versus uninformed consent for prostate surgery: the value of electronic consents. J Urol 2006; 176: 694-9, discussion 699.
7. Montgomery BS, Venn SN, Beard RC. Written information for transurethral resection of the prostate - a national audit. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 9-11.
8. Bolam v Friern HMC. 1957; WLR. 582.
9. Wheeler R. Consent in surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 261-4.
10. Chatterton v Gerson. QB 432, 1981; 1 All ER 257 (QBD).
11. Re C (Adult: Refusal of medical treatment). Family Law 1994; 24: 131-2.
12. Hopper KD, TenHave TR, Tully DA, Hall TE. The readability of currently used surgical/procedure consent forms in the United States. Surgery 1998; 123: 496-503.
13. Bottrell MM, Alpert H, Fischbach RL, Emanuel LL. Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: facilitating quality patient-physician interaction. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 26-33.
14. Basson MD, Gomez R, Fishman L, Panzini L. Informed consent for screening sigmoidoscopy in a Veterans Administration population. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1939-46.
15. Everett CR, Novoseletsky D, Cole S, Frank J, Remillard C, Patel RK. Informed consent in interventional spine procedures: how much do patients understand? Pain Physician 2005; 8: 251-5.
16. Saw KC, Wood AM, Murphy K, Parry JR, Hartfall WG. Informed consent: an evaluation of patients' understanding and opinion (with respect to the operation of transurethral resection of prostate). J R Soc Med 1994; 87: 143-4.
17. Huntley JS, Shields DA, Stallworthy NK. Consent obtained by the junior house officer - is it informed? J R Soc Med 1998; 91: 528-30.
18. Stanley BM, Walters DJ, Maddern GJ. Informed consent: how much information is enough? Aust NZ J Surg 1998; 68: 788-91.
19. Sinclair A, Adshead J, Williams G. BAUS Bulletin 2005; Issue 3: 12-3.