Economic cognition in humans and animals: the search for core mechanisms

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 63-66

  Santos, Laurie R ^a   Hughes, Kelly D ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVERSIVE BEHAVIOR; CHIMPANZEE; COGNITION; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MONKEY; NONHUMAN; ONTOGENY; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 67649361548     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.005     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Hastie R., and Dawes R.M. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
2. Glimcher P.W. Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge
3. Krebs J.R., and Davies N.B. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (1993), Blackwell Scientific Publications p. 57
4. Camerer, and Colin F. Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics 1 2 (1998) 163-183
5. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., and Tversky A. (Eds). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
6. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Choices, Values, and Frames (2000), Cambridge University, Cambridge
7. Santos L.R., and Lakshminarayanan. Innate constraints on judgment and decision-making? Insights from children and non-human primates. In: Carruthers P., Laurence S., and Stich S. (Eds). The Innate Mind: Foundations and the Future (2008), Oxford University Press, Oxford 293-310
8. Kinzler K.D., and Spelke E.S. Core systems in human cognition. Progress in Brain Research 164 (2007) 257-264. This paper is a recent review that provides a nice introduction to the core knowledge approach.
9. Spelke E.S. Core knowledge. American Psychologist 55 (2000) 1233-1243
10. Hauser M.D., and Spelke E.S. Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics. In: Gazzaniga M. (Ed). The Cognitive Neurosciences vol. 3 (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge
11. Spelke E.S. Developing knowledge of space: core systems and new combinations. In: Kosslyn S.M., and Galaburda A. (Eds). Languages of the Brain (2003), Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Dehaene S., Izard V., Pica P., and Spelke E.S. Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 311 (2006) 381-384
13. Hermer-Vasquez L., Spelke E.S., and Katsnelson A.S. Sources of flexibility in human cognition: dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology 39 (1999) 3-36
14. Wang R.F., and Spelke E.S. Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 9 (2002) 376-382
15. Doeller C., King J., and Burgess N. Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (2008) 5909-5914
16. Cheng K. Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 9 (2008) 355-361
17. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979) 263-292
18. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (1981) 453-458
19. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59 (1986) 251-278
20. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991) 1039-1061
21. Odean T. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?. Journal of Finance 5 (1998) 1775-1798
22. Genesove D., and Mayer C. Loss aversion and seller behavior: evidence from the housing market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001) 1233-1260
23. Hardie B.G.S., Johnson E.J., and Fader P.S. Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science 12 (1993) 378-394
24. Camerer C., Babcock L., Loewenstein G., and Thaler R. Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: one day at a time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1997) 407-441
25. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., and Thaler R.H. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) 1325-1348
26. Thaler R.H. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1 (1980) 39-60
27. Chen M.K., Lakshminarayanan V., and Santos L.R. The evolution of our preferences: evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy 114 3 (2006) 517-537
28. Lakshminaryanan V, Santos LR, Chen MK: The evolution of risky choices: framing effects in non-human economic behavior. PLOS One, in preparation.
29. Lakshminaryanan V., Chen M.K., and Santos L.R. Endowment effect in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363 (2008) 3837-3844
30. Marsh B., and Kacelnik A. Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 (2002) 3353-3355
31. Harbaugh W.T., Krause K., and Vesterlund L. Are adults better behaved than children? Age, experience, and the endowment effect. Economics Letters 70 (2001) 175-181
32. Brosnan S.F., Grady M., Lambeth S.P., Schapiro S.J., and Beran M.J. Chimpanzee Autarky. PLoS ONE 3 1 (2008) 1518
33. Brosnan S.F., Jones O.D., Lambeth S.P., Mareno M.C., Richardson A.S., and Schapiro S.J. Endowment effects in chimpanzees. Current Biology 17 19 (2007) 1704-1707
34. Fehr E., and Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425 (2003) 785-791
35. Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H., and McElreath R. In search of Homo Economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The American Economic Review 91 (2001) 73-78
36. Fehr E., and Gachter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415 (2002) 137-140
37. Camerer C. Behavioral Game Theory-Experiments in Strategic Interaction (2003), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
38. Nowak M.A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314 (2006) 1560-1563
39. Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., and Gintis H. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
40. Zahn-Waxler C., Radke-Yarrow M., Wagner E., and Chapman M. Development of concern for others. Developmental Psychology 28 (1992) 126-136
41. Warneken F., and Tomasello M. Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311 (2006) 1301-1302
42. Olson K., and Spelke E. Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition 108 (2008) 222-231. This paper provides an important demonstration of reciprocity in three year old children, suggesting that the roots of human cooperation emerge relatively early in human development.
43. Lakshminarayananan V., and Santos L. Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others' welfare. Current Biology 18 (2008) 999-1000
44. Burkart J., Fehr E., Efferson C., and van Schaik C. Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. PNAS 104 (2007) 19762-19766. This paper represents the first successful demonstration of other-regarding preferences in a nonhuman primate. Unlike chimpanzees [49], marmoset monkeys prosocially provide food to other individuals.
45. de Waal F.B.M., Leimgruber K., and Greenberg A.R. Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. PNAS 105 (2008) 13685-13689
46. Cronin KA, Schroeder K, Rothwell E, Silk J, Snowdon CT: Cooperatively breeding tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. Journal of Comparative Psychology, in press.
47. Brosnan S.F., and de Waal F.B.M. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425 (2003) 297-299
48. de Waal F.B.M., and Berger M.L. Payment for labour in monkeys. Nature 404 (2000) 563-1563
49. Silk J.B., Brosnan S.F., Vonk J., Henrich J., Povinelli D.J., Richardson A.S., Lambeth S.P., Mascaro J., and Schapiro S.J. Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437 (2005) 357-1359
50. Jensen K., Call J., and Tomasello M. Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318 (2007) 107-109. This elegant study adapted the Ultimatum Game for chimpanzees. In contrast to humans, chimpanzees accepted any offer from a conspecific and do not punish individuals that give unfair offers.