A micro-level ‘consumer approach’ to species population dynamics

Natural Resource Modeling

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 7-59

  Christiaans, Thomas ^a   Eichner, Thomas ^a   Pethig, Rüdiger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Extinction; Growth; Predator prey relations; Resource competition; Species, xs

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649351303     PISSN: 08908575     EISSN: 19397445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2007.tb00200.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. C. Adami [2002], Ab Initio Modeling of Ecosystems with Artificial Life, Natur. Resource Modeling 15, 133–145.
2. J.J. Anderson [2002], An Agent-Based Event Driven Foraging Model, Natur. Resource Modeling 15, 55–82.
3. R.S. Cantrell and C. Cosner [2001], On the Dynamics of Predator-Prey Models with the Beddington-DeAngelis Functional Response, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 257, 206–222.
4. C. Clark [1976], Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
5. C.W. Cobb and P.H. Douglas [1928], A Theory of Production, Amer. Econ. Review 18, 139–165.
6. T.D. Crocker and J. Tschirhart [1992], Ecosystems, Externalities and Economies, Environ. Resource Econ. 2, 551–567.
7. G. Debreu [1959], Theory of Value, Wiley, New York.
8. T. Eichner and R. Pethig [2003], A Microfoundation of Predator-Prey Dynamics, Discussion Paper 110–03, University of Siegen.
9. T. Eichner and R. Pethig [2004], Economic Land Use, Ecosystem Services and Microfounded Species Dynamics, Discussion Paper, University of Siegen.
10. D. Finnoff and J. Tschirhart [2003a], Protecting an Endangered Species while Harvesting Its Prey in a General Equilibrium Ecosystem Model, Land Econ. 79, 160–180.
11. D. Finnoff and J. Tschirhart [2003b], Harvesting in an Eight-Species Ecosystem, J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 45, 589–611.
12. V. Grimm [1999], Ten Years of Individual-Based Modelling in Ecology: What Have We Learned and What Could We Learn in the Future, Ecol. Model. 115, 129–148.
13. B. Hannon [1973], The Structure of Ecosystems, J. Theoret. Biol. 41, 535–546.
14. B. Hannon [1976], Marginal Product Pricing in the Ecosystem, J. Theoret. Biol. 56, 253–267.
15. M.W. Hirsch and S. Smale [1974], Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra, Academic Press, New York.
16. Hsu et al. [2001], Global Analysis of the Michaelis-Menten-Type Ratio-Dependent Predator-Prey System, J. Math. Biol. 42, 489–506.
17. Y. Kuang and E. Beretta [1998], Global Qualitative Analysis of a Ratio-Dependent Predator-Prey System, J. Math. Biol. 36, 389–406.
18. S.L. Lima and L.M. Dill [1990], Behavioral Decisions Made under the Risk of Predation: A Review and Prospectus, Canad. J. Zool. 68, 619–640.
19. A.J. Lotka [1925], Elements of Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
20. Mas-Colell et al. [1995], Microeconomic Theory, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
21. R.M. May (ed.) [1981], Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford.
22. S. Pacala and D. Tilman [1994], Limiting Similarity in Mechanistic and Spatial Models of Plant Competition in Heterogenous Environments, The Amer. Naturalist 143, 222–257.
23. L. Perko [1996], Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed., Springer, New York.
24. L. Persson and A.M. De Roos [2003], Adaptive Habitat Use in Size-Structured Populations: Linking Individual Behavior to Population Processes, Ecol. 84, 1129–1139.
25. R. Pethig and J. Tschirhart [2001], Microfoundations of Population Dynamics, J. Bioecon. 3, 27–49.
26. Railsback et al. [2002], Population-Level Analysis and Validation of an Individual-Based Cutthroat Trout Model, Natur. Resource Modeling 15, 83–110.
27. T.W. Schoener [1986], Mechanistic Approaches to Community Ecology: A New Reductionism, Amer. Zool. 26, 81–106.
28. D. Tilman [1980], Resources: A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Competition and Predation, The Amer. Naturalist 116, 363–393.
29. D. Tilman [1982], Resource Competition and Community Structure, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
30. D. Tilman [[1985]], The Resource Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession, The Amer. Naturalist 125, 827–852.
31. J. Tschirhart [2000], General Equilibrium of an Ecosystem, J. Theoret. Biol. 203, 13–32.
32. J. Tschirhart [2002], Resource Competition among Plants: From Optimizing to Community Structure, Ecol. Model. 148, 191–212.
33. J. Tschirhart [2003], Ecological Transfers in Non-Human Communities Parallel Economic Markets in a General Equilibrium Ecosystem Model, J. Bioecon. 5, 193–214.
34. J. Tschirhart [2004], A New Adaptive System Approach to Predator-Prey Modeling, Ecol. Model. 176, 255–276.
35. H. Uzawa [1961], The Stability of Dynamic Processes, Econometrica 29, 617–631.
36. P.F. Verhulst [1838], Notice sur la Loi que la Population Suit dans Son Accroisse-ment, Correspondance Mathematique et Physique 10, 113–121.
37. V. Volterra [1926], Variazionie Fluttuazioni del Numero d'Individui in Specie Animali Conviventi, Mem. Acad. Lincei. 2, 31–113 (Variations and Fluctuations of a Number of Individuals in Animal Species Living Together, transl. in R.N. Chapman [1931], Animal ecology, McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 409–448.