A methodology for eliciting and modeling exceptions

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 736-747

  Peleg, Mor ^a   Somekh, Judith ^b   Dori, Dov ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Conceptual modeling; Elicitation methods; Exceptions; Systems specification methodology

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL CARE; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONCEPTUAL MODELING; ELICITATION METHODS; EXCEPTIONS; GRAPHICAL MODEL; MODELING METHODOLOGY; OBJECT-PROCESS METHODOLOGY; SAFETY CRITICAL SYSTEMS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN; SYSTEMS SPECIFICATION METHODOLOGY; TREATMENT GUIDELINES;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; GRAPHIC METHODS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR; SPECIFICATIONS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

RISK ANALYSIS;

AMOXICILLIN;

ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OBJECT PROCESS METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 67649340809     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Eberlein APG. Requirements acquisition and specification for telecommunication services. University of Wales; 1997.
2. Eder J, Liebhart W. Contribution to exception handling in workflow management. In: Proceedings of EDBT work-shop on workflow management systems. Valencia, Spain; 1998.
3. Klein M., and Dellarocas C. A systematic repository of knowledge about handling exceptions in business processes. ASES Working Paper ASES-WP-2000-03 (2000), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
4. Sadiq SW, Orlowska ME. On capturing exceptions in workflow process models. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on business information systems, Poznan, Poland; 2000.
5. Klein M., and Dellarocas C. A knowledge-based approach to handling exceptions in workflow systems. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 9 3-4 (2000) 399-402
6. Dori D. Object-process methodology-a holistic systems paradigm (2002), Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY
7. Peleg M., and Dori D. The model multiplicity problem: experimenting with real-time specification methods. IEEE Trans Software Eng 26 8 (2000) 742-759
8. Dori D. Syntax and semantics of the object-process methodology (OPM) language. Available from: http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchFirstRepresentation.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0000872.s001, last access date 12/10/2008.
9. Dori D, Reinhartz-Berger I, Sturm A. OPCAT-a bimodal case tool for object-process based system development. In: Fifth international conference on enterprise information systems; 2003. p. 286-91.
10. Shlezinger G, Reinhartz-Berger I, Dori D. Analyzing object-oriented design patterns from an object-process viewpoint. In: Third international conference of next generation information technologies; 2006.
11. Greiner U., Mueller R., Rahm E., Ramsch J., Heller B., and Loeffler M. AdaptFlow: protocol-based medical treatment using adaptive workflows. Methods Inf Med 44 1 (2005) 80-88
12. Luo Z., Seth A., Kochut K., and Miller J. Exception handling in workflow systems. Appl Intell 13 (2000) 125-147
13. Casati F., Ceri S., Paraboschi S., and Pozzi G. Specification and implementation of exceptions in workflow management systems. ACM Trans Database Syst 24 3 (1999) 405-451
14. Grefen P., Pernici B., and Sanchez G. Database support for workflow management: the WIDE project (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers
15. Bock C. UML 2 activity and action models, part 6: structured activities. J Object Technol 4 (2005) 43-66
16. Russel N, van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede A. Exception handling patterns in process-aware information systems. Report No.: BPM Center Report BPM 06-04, BPMcenter.org; 2006.
17. Hagen C, Alonso G. Flexible exception handling in the OPERA process support system. In: 18th international conference on distributed computing systems; 1998.
18. Casati F, Pozzi G. Modeling exceptional behavior in commercial workflow management systems. In: Fourth international conference on cooperative information systems; 1999.
19. Mulyar N, Pesic M, van der Aalst, WMP, Peleg M. Towards flexibility in clinical guideline modelling languages. In: Business process modeling conference workshop: first international workshop on process-oriented information systems in healthcare. Brisbane, Australia; 2007.
20. Chiu DKW, Li Q, Karlapalem K. ADOME-WFMS: toward cooperative handling of workflow exceptions. In: Advances in exception handling techniques; 2001. p. 271-88.
21. Chiu D.K.W., Li Q., and Karlapalem K. Exception handling with workflow evolution in ADOME-WFMS: a taxonomy and resolution techniques. ACM SIGGROUP Bull 20 (1999) 8
22. Hwang SY, Ho SF, Tang J. Mining exception instances to facilitate workflow exception handling. In: Sixth international conference on database systems for advanced applications; 1999.
23. Luo Z, Sheth A, Kochut K, Arpinar B. Exception handling for conflict resolution in cross-organizational workflows: LSDIS Lab, Computer Science, University of Georgia; 2002.
24. Eder J, Liebhart W. The work-flow activity model WAMO. In: Third international conference on cooperative information systems; 1995.
25. Fridsma D.B., and Thomsen J. Representing medical protocols for organizational simulation: an information-processing approach. Comput Math Organ Theory 4 1 (1998) 71-95
26. Quaglini S., Stefanelli M., Lanzola G., Caporusso V., and Panzarasa S. Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems. Artif Intell Med 22 (2001) 65-80
27. Brambilla M, Ceri S, Comai S, Tziviskou C. Exception handling in workflow-driven web applications. In: 14th International Conference on WWW; 2005.
28. Avizienis A, Laprie JC, Randell B. Fundamental concepts of dependability: UCLA CSD Report #010028; 2000.
29. Somekh Y. Modeling exceptions with object process methodology: M.Sc. Thesis, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology; 2007.
30. Casati F., and Cugola G. Error handling in process support systems. Advances in exception handling techniques (2001), Springer 251-270
31. Sutton M. Preconditions, postconditions and provisional execution in software processes: LASER technical report 95-77 (1995), University of Massachusetts, Amherst
32. Schadow G., McDonald C.J., Suico J.G., Fohring U., and Tolxdorff T. Units of measure in clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6 2 (1999) 151-161
33. Kim MH, Park YM, Yang SM, Park JK. Modeling of a highly reliable real-time distributed system using the RTO.k model and the monitor object. In: Proceedings of the third workshop on object-oriented real-time dependable systems; 1997. p. 48.
34. Somekh Y, Peleg M, Dori D. Classifying and modeling exceptions through object process methodology. In: Proceedings of the international conference on systems engineering and modeling; 2007.
35. Boxwala A.A., Peleg M., Tu S., Ogunyemi O., Zeng Q., Wang D., et al. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. J Biomed Inform 37 3 (2004) 147-161