Lateral image degradation in terrestrial laser scanning

Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 184-189

  Laefer, Debra F ^a   Fitzgerald, Michael ^b   Maloney, Eoghan M ^b   Coyne, David ^b   Lennon, Donal ^c   Morrish, Sean W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UMG

^c URBAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cracks; Defects; Digital techniques; Field investigations; Imaging techniques; Laser scanning; Site evaluation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC DETECTION; BEAM WIDTHS; BUILDING DAMAGE; DEFECT DETECTION; DIGITAL TECHNIQUES; FIELD EXPERIMENT; FIELD INVESTIGATIONS; GEOMETRIC POSITION; IMAGE DEGRADATION; LASER SCANNING; SCAN ANGLE; SITE EVALUATION; STANDOFF DISTANCE; TARGET OBJECT; TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION; TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING;

CRACK DETECTION; CRACKS; DAMAGE DETECTION; ERRORS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; LASER APPLICATIONS; LASERS; STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

SCANNING;

EID: 67649300782     PISSN: 10168664     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2749/101686609788220196     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Mills J, Barber D. Geomatics techniques for structural surveying. J. Survey. Eng. 2004; 130(2): 56-64.
2. Heinz I, Mettenleitter M, Hartl T, Froehlich C, Langer D. 3D LiDAR for inspection of real world environments. In Proceedings of the Optical 3D Measurement Techniques V , Gruen A, Kahmen H (eds): 2001; 10-7.
3. Laefer D, Pradhan A. Evacuation route selection based on tree-based hazards using LiDAR and GIS. J. Transp. Eng. 2006; 132(4): 312-320.
4. Means J, Acker S, Fitt B, Renslow M, Emerson L, Hendrix C. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning Lidar. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2000; 66(11): 1367-1371.
5. Dagdelen K. Advances in pit slope monitoring and management systems. Eng. Min. J. 2005; 206(1): 20-22.
6. Park HS, Lee HM, Adeli H. A new approach for health monitoring of structures: terrestrial laser scanning. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 2007; 22: 19-30.
7. Lichti D, Jamtsho S. Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners. Photogramm. Rec. 2006; 21(114): 141-160.
8. OPTECH.ILRIS-3D Intelligent LaserRanging and Imaging Systems.2008. \http://www.optech.ca/ i3dtechoverview-ilris.htm. Accessed December 2, 2008.
9. TRIMBLE. RealWorks Survey Office Software for 3D Scanning in Surveying and Spatial Imaging. 2008. http://www.trimble.com/ realworks.shtml. Accessed December 2, 2008.
10. Laefer D, Carr H, Morrish S, Kalkan E. Opportunities and impediments to the use of 3d laser scanning for adjacent excavations. In Geo- Congress 2006: Geotechnical Engineering in the Information Technology Age, Geotechnical Pub. paper 40803-11158, DeGroot DJ, DeJong JT, Frost D, Baise LG (eds). ASCE, 2006; 6, doi:10 .1061/40803(187)77.
11. Hashash Y, Finno J. Development of new integrated tools for predicting, monitoring, and controlling ground movements due to excavations. Pract. Period. Struct. Des Constr. 2008; 13(1): 4-10.
12. Looby M, Long M. Deep excavations in Dublin - recent developments. Trans. Eng. Ireland 2007; 131: 1-15.
13. Laefer D, Gannon J, Deely E. Reliability of crack detection for baseline, condition assessment documentation. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2009. (in press).
14. Al-Manasir K, Fraser C. Registration of terrestrial laser scanner data using imagery. Photogramm. Rec. 2006; 21(115): 255-268.
15. Burland J, Broms B, De Mello V. Behaviour of Foundations and Structures: SOA Report. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on SMFE, Tokyo, 1977; 495-546.