Reproductive behavior and relative reproductive success of natural- And hatchery-origin Hood Canal summer chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta)

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 781-789

  Berejikian, Barry A ^a   Van Doornik, Donald M ^a   Scheurer, Julie A ^a,b   Bush, Richard ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; HATCHERY; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SALMONID;

HOOD CANAL; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

ONCORHYNCHUS KETA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 67649265347     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F09-041     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Araki, H., Cooper, B., and Blouin, M.S. 2007a. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science (Washington, D.C.), 318: 100-103. doi:10.1126/ science.1145621. PMID:17916734.
2. Araki, H., Ardren, W.R., Olsen, E., Cooper, B., and Blouin, M.S. 2007b. Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conserv. Biol. 21: 181-190. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00564.x. PMID:17298524.
3. Araki, H., Berejikian, B.A., Ford, M.J., and Blouin, M.S. 2008. Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids fish in the wild. Evol. Appl.1: 342-355. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00026.x.
4. Banks, M.A., Blouin, M.S., Baldwin, B.A., Rashbrook, V.K., Fitzgerald, H.A., Blankenship, S.M., and Hedgecock, D. 1999. Isolation and inheritance of novel microsatellites in Chinook salmon(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). J. Hered. 90: 281-288. doi:10.1093/jhered/90.2.281.Berejikian, B.A., and Ford, M.J. 2004. Review of the relative fitness of hatchery and natural salmon. US Dept. Com., NOAATech. Memo. No. NMFS-NWFSC-61.
5. Berejikian, B.A., Tezak, E.P., Park, L., LaHood, E., Schroder, S.L., and Beall, E. 2001. Male competition and breeding success incaptively reared and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch).Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 804-810. doi:10.1139/cjfas-58-4-804.
6. Berejikian, B., Van Doornik, D., LaRae, A., Tezak, S., and Lee, J. 2005. The effects of exercise on behavior and reproductive success of captively reared steelhead. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134:1236-1252. doi:10.1577/T04-192.1.
7. Campton, D.E. 2005. Sperm competition in salmon hatcheries: the need to institutionalize genetically benign spawning protocols. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134: 1495-1498. doi:10.1577/T05-071.1.
8. Dickerson, B.R., Quinn, T.P., and Willson, M.F. 2002. Body size, arrival date, and reproductive success of pink salmon, Oncor hynchus gorbuscha. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14: 29-14.
9. Dickerson, B.R., Brinck, K.W., Willson, M.F., Bentzen, P., and Quinn, T.P. 2005. Relative importance of salmon body size and arrival time at breeding grounds to reproductive success. Ecol ogy, 86: 347-352. doi:10.1890/03-625.
10. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1992. Reproductive behaviour of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): does it differ? Aquaculture, 103: 101-121. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(92)90405-A.
11. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1993. Breeding success of hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in competition.Ecol. Appl. 3 : 230-245. doi:10.2307/1941826.
12. Fleming, I.A., Lamberg, A., and Jonsson, B. 1997. Effects of early experience on the reproductive performance of Atlantic salmon.Behav. Ecol. 8: 470-480. doi:10.1093/beheco/8.5.470.
13. Fleming, I.A., Hindar, K., Mjolnerod, I., Jonsson, B.B., Balstad, T.,and Lamberg, A. 2000. Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.Ser. B Biol. Sci. 267: 1517-1523. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1173.
14. Ford, M.J., Fuss, H., Boelts, B., LaHood, E., Hard, J.J., and Miller,J. 2006. Changes in run timing and natural smolt production in anaturally spawning coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) streamafter 60 years of intensive hatchery supplementation. Can. J.Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63: 2343-2355. doi:10.1139/F06-119.
15. Fraser, D.J. 2008. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evol. Appl. 2: 1-52.
16. Hankin, D.G., Nicholas, J.W., and Downey, T.W. 1993. Evidence for inheritance of age of maturity in chinook salmon, Oncor hynchus tshawytscha. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 347-358.doi:10.1139/f93- 040.
17. Knudsen, C.M., Schroder, S.L., and Busack, C.A. 2006. Comparison of life history traits between first-generation hatchery and wild upper Yakima River spring Chinook salmon. Trans. Am.Fish. Soc. 135: 1130-1144. doi:10.1577/T05-121.1.
18. Kostow, K.E. 2004. Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provideevidence for modified selection due to captive breeding. Can. J.Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 577-589. doi:10.1139/f04-019.
19. Larsen, D.A., Beckman, B.R., Cooper, K.A., Barrett, D., Johnston,M., Swanson, P., and Dickhoff, W.W. 2004. Assessment of highrates of precocious male maturation in a spring Chinook salmonsupplementation hatchery program. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 133:98-120. doi:10.1577/T03-031.
20. Leider, S.A., Hulett, P.L., Loch, J.J., and Chilcote, M.J. 1990. Elec-trophoretic comparison of the reproductive success of naturallyspawning transplanted and wild steelhead trout through the returning adult stage. Aquaculture, 88: 239-252. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(90)90151-C.
21. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L., and Pemberton, J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference innatural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639-655. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x. PMID:9633105.
22. McClure, M.M., Holmes, E.E., Sanderson, B.L., and Jordan, C.E.2003. A large-scale multispecies status assessment: anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Ecol. Appl. 13: 964989. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[964: ALMSAA]2.0.CO;2.
23. McElhany, P., Ruckelshaus, M.H., Ford, M.J., Wainwright, T.C.,and Bjorkstedt, E.P. 2000. Viable salmon populations and the recovery of evolutionarily significant units. US Dept. Com.,NOAA Tech. Memo. No. NMFS-NWFSC-42.
24. McGinnity, P., Prodohl, P., Maoileidigh, N.O., Hynes, R., and Cooper, D. 2004. Differential lifetime success and performance of native and non-native Atlantic salmon examined under communal natural conditions. J. Fish Biol. 65(Suppl. A): 173-187.doi:10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00557.x.
25. McLean, J.E., Bentzen, P., and Quinn, T.P. 2005. Nonrandom, sizeand timing-biased breeding in a hatchery population of steelhead trout. Conserv. Biol. 19: 446-454. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00515.x.
26. Olsen, J.B., Wilson, S.L., Kretschmer, E.J., Jones, K.C., and Seeb,J.E. 2000. Characterization of 14 tetranucleotide microsatelliteloci derived from sockeye salmon. Mol. Ecol. 9: 2185-2187.doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000. 105317.x. PMID:11123645.
27. Quinn, T.P. 2005. Behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, British Columbia.
28. Quinn, T.P., and Foote, C.J. 1994. The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behaviour of sockeyesalmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Anim. Behav. 48: 751-761.doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1300.
29. Reisenbichler, R.R., Rubin, S., Wetzel, L., and Phelps, S. 2004.atural selection after release from a hatchery leads to domestication in steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In Stock enhancement and sea ranching. Edited by M. Leber, S. Kitada, H.L. Blanken- ship, and T. Svasand. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK. pp. 371-384.
30. Schroder, S.L. 1981. The role of sexual selection in determining the overall mating patterns and mate choice in chum salmon. Doc toral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
31. Schroder, S.L., Knudsen, C.M., Pearsons, T.N., Kassler, T.W., Young, S.F., Busack, C.A., and Fast, D.E. 2008. Breeding success of wild and first generation hatchery female spring Chinook salmon spawning in an artificial stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 137: 1475-1489. doi:10.1577/T07-123.1.
32. Scribner, K.T., Gust, J.R., and Fields, R.L. 1996. Isolation and characterization of novel salmon microsatellite loci: cross-species amplification and population genetic applications. Can. J. Fish.Aquat. Sci. 53: 833-841. doi:10.1139/cjfas-53-4-833.
33. Seamons, T.R., Bentzen, P., and Quinn, T.P. 2004. The effects of adult length and arrival date on individual reproductive success in wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can. J. Fish.Aquat. Sci. 61: 193-204. doi:10.1139/f03-158.
34. Seamons, T.R., Bentzen, P., and Quinn, T.P. 2007. DNA parentage analysis reveals inter-annual variation in selection: results from 19 consecutive brood years in steelhead trout. Evol. Ecol. Res.9: 409-431.
35. Small, M.P., Beacham, T.D., Withler, R.E., and Nelson, R.J. 1998.Discriminating coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) populations within the Fraser River, British Columbia, using microsatellite DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 7: 141-155. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00324.x.
36. van den Berghe, E.P., and Gross, M.R. 1989. Natural selection resulting from female breeding competition in a Pacific salmon(coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution, 43: 125-140. doi:10.2307/2409169.
37. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Point No Point Treaty Tribes. 2000. Summer Chum Salmon Conservation Initia tive-an implementation plan to recover summer chum in the Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca region. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. Available athettp://wdfw.wa.gov/fish/chum/chum.htm [accessed 6 July 2008].
38. Williamson, K.S., Cordes, J.F., and May, B. 2002. Characterization of microsatellite loci in chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids.Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2: 17-19. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00129.x.