Antidepressant-like effects of paroxetine are produced by lower doses than those which produce nausea

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 190-195

  Tuerke, Katharine J ^a   Leri, Francesco ^a   Parker, Linda A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Depression; Forced swim test; Nausea; Place preference; Reward; Serotonin; SSRI; Taste reactivity

Indexed keywords

PAROXETINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AVERSIVE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FORCED SWIMMING TEST; IMMOBILIZATION; LOW DRUG DOSE; MALE; NAUSEA; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; TASTE DISCRIMINATION;

ANIMALS; ANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTS, SECOND-GENERATION; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NAUSEA; PAROXETINE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REWARD; SWIMMING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 67649262132     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrews P.L.R., and Horn C.C. Signals for nausea and emesis: implications for models of upper gastrointestinal diseases. Auton Neurosci 125 (2006) 100-115
2. Andrews P.L., Rappaport W.G., and Sanger G.J. Neuropharmacology of emesis induced by anti-cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci 9 (1988) 333-341
3. Borsini F., and Meli A. Is the forced swimming test a suitable model for revealing antidepressant activity?. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 94 (1988) 147-160
4. Cunningham C.L., Gremel C.M., and Groblewski P.A. Drug-induced conditioned place preference and aversion in mice. Nat Protoc 1 (2006) 1662-1670
5. Davies A.M., and Parker L.A. Fenfluramine-induced place aversion in a three-choice apparatus. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44 (1993) 595-600
6. Detke M.J., Rickels M., and Lucki I. Active behaviors in the rat forced swimming test differentially produced by serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 121 (1995) 66-72
7. Garcia J., Hankins W.G., and Rusiniak K.W. Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. Science 185 (1974) 824-831
8. Grill H.C., and Norgren R. The taste reactivity test. I: Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats. Brain Res 143 (1978) 263-279
9. Kulkarni S.K., and Dhir A. Effect of various classes of antidepressants in behavioral paradigms of despair. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 31 (2007) 1248-1254
10. Limebeer C.L., and Parker L.A. The antiemetic drug ondansetron interferes with lithium-induced conditioned rejection reactions, but not lithium-induced taste avoidance in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 26 (2000) 371-384
11. Limebeer C.L., Krohn J.P., Cross-Mellor S., Ossenkopp K.-P., and Parker L.A. Exposure to a context previously associated with toxin (LiCl) - or motion-induced sickness elicits conditioned gaping in rats: evidence in support of a model of anticipatory nausea. Behav Brain Res 187 (2008) 33-40
12. 1A agonist on fluoxetine-induced conditioned gaping reactions in rats. Psychopharmacol 203 (2009) 763-770
13. Owens M.J., Knight D.L., and Nemeroff C.B. Paroxetine binding to rat norephinepherine transporter in vivo. Biol Psychiatry 47 (2000) 842-845
14. Parker L.A. Positively reinforcing drugs may produce a different kind of CTA than drugs which are not positively reinforcing. Learn Motiv 19 (1988) 207-220
15. Parker L.A. Taste avoidance and taste aversion: evidence for two different processes. Learn Behav 31 (2003) 165-172
16. Parker L.A., Rana S.A., and Limebeer C.L. Conditioned nausea in rats: Assessment by conditioned disgust reactions, rather than conditioned taste avoidance. Can J Exp Psych 62 (2008) 198-209
17. Peretti S., Judge R., and Hindmarch I. Safety and tolerability considerations: tricyclic antidepressants vs. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 403 (2000) 7-25
18. Porsolt R.D., Anton G., Blavet N., and Jalfre M. Behavioural despair in rats: a new model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Eur J Pharmacol 47 (1977) 379-391
19. Reed A.L., Happe H.K., Petty F., and Bylund D.B. Juvenile rats in the forced-swim test model the human response to antidepressant treatment for pediatric depression. Psychopharmacol 197 (2007) 433-441
20. Rénéric J.P., and Lucki I. Antidepressant behavioral effects by dual inhibition of monoamine reuptake in the forced swimming test. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 136 (1998) 190-197
21. Rosenzweig-Lipson S., Beyer C.E., Hughes Z.A., Khawaja X., Rajarao S.J., Malberg J.E., et al. Differentiating antidepressants of the future: efficacy and safety. Pharmacol Ther 113 (2007) 134-153
22. Sánchez C., and Meier E. Behavioral profiles of SSRIs in animal models of depression, anxiety and aggression. Are they all alike?. Psychopharmacol (Berl) 129 (1997) 197-205
23. Subhan F., Deslandes P.N., Pache D.M., and Sewell R.D.E. Do antidepressants affect motivation in conditioned place preference?. Eur J Pharmacol 408 (2000) 257-263
24. Travers J.B., and Norgren R. Electromyographic analysis of the ingestion and rejection of sapid stimuli in the rat. Behav Neurosci 100 (1986) 544-555
25. Weiner I., Schiller D., Gaisler-Salomon I., Green A., and Joel D. A comparison of drug effects in latent inhibition and the forced swim test differentiates between the typical antipsychotic haloperidol, the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine, and the antidepressants imipramine and paroxetine. Behav Pharmacol 14 (2003) 215-222