Choquet integral with respect to Łukasiewicz filters, and its modifications

Information Sciences

Volumn 179, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 2912-2922

  Hliněná, Dana ^a   Kalina, Martin ^b   Král', Pavol ^c  

^a BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^c MATEJ BEL UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

ukasiewicz filter; Choquet integral; Fuzzy preference structures; TL Evaluator

Indexed keywords

CHOQUET INTEGRAL; DECISION PROBLEMS; FUZZY PREFERENCE STRUCTURES; TL-EVALUATOR; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

INTEGRAL EQUATIONS;

EID: 67649245926     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. L-evaluators. Proceedings of AGOP 2007 (2007), Academia Press, Ghent 165-172
2. S. Bodjanova, M. Kalina, T-evaluators and S-evaluators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, in press.
3. K.J. Burns, H.A. Demaree, A chance to learn: on matching probabilities to optimize utilities, Information Sciences, in press.
4. Choquet G. Theory of capacities. Annales de L Institut Fourier 5 (1953-1954) 131-295
5. Grabisch M. Possibility measures, integration and fuzzy possibility measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 92 (1997) 191-196
6. Fodor J.C., and Roubens M. Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support (1994), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht
7. S. Greco, S. Giove, B. Matarazzo, The Choquet integral with respect to a level dependent capacity, FSS, submitted for publication.
8. Havranová Z., and Kalina M. Fuzzy preference relations and Łukasiewicz filters. Proceedings of the Fifth EUSFLAT conference. New Dimensions in Fuzzy Logic and Related Technologies vol. II (2007), University of Ostrava, Ostrava 337-341
9. L-evaluators. Proceedings of AGOP 2007 (2007), Academia Press, Ghent 173-178
10. Havranová Z., and Kalina M. T-filters and T-ideals. Acta Universitatis Mathaei Belii ser. Mathematics 14 (2007) 19-27
11. D. Hliněná, P. Král', Similarity of fuzzy preference structures based on metrics, in: Proceedings of the Fifth EUSFLAT Conference, New Dimensions in Fuzzy Logic and Related Technologies, vol. II, 2007, pp. 431-436.
12. Hliněná D., and Král' P. Comparing fuzzy preference relations using fuzzy set operations. Proceedings of AGOP 2007 (2007), Academia Press, Ghent 135-140
13. M. Kalina, Łukasiewicz filters and similarities, in: Proceedings of AGOP 2005, Lugano, 2005, pp. 57-60.
14. Klement E.P., Mesiar R., and Pap E. Triangular Norms (2000), Kluwer, Dordrecht
15. Kojadinovic I. An axiomatic approach to the measurement of the amount of interaction among criteria or players. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 152 (2005) 417-435
16. Mesiar R. Choquet-like integrals. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 194 (1995) 477-488
17. T. Murofushi, S. Soneda, Techniques for reading fuzzy measures: III. Interaction index, in: Proceedings of the Ninth Fuzzy System Symposium, Sapporo, Japan, 1993, pp. 693-696.
18. Shilkret N. Maxitive measures and integration. Indagationes Mathematicae 33 (1971) 109-116
19. Šipoš J. Integral with respect to a premeasure. Mathematica 29 (1979) 141-145
20. Struk P. Extremal fuzzy integrals. Soft Computing 10 (2006) 502-505
21. M. Sugeno, Theory of fuzzy integrals and applications, Ph.D. Thesis, Tokyo Inst. of Tech., 1974.
22. Vitali G. Sulla definizione di integrale delle funzioni di una variabile. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata 2 (1925) 111-121
23. Weber S. Two integrals and some modified version - critical remarks. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20 (1986) 97-105
24. Chen Y.-L., Wu C.-C., and Tang K. Building a cost-constrained decision tree with multiple condition attributes. Information Sciences 179 (2009) 967-979