The ACE trial: A randomized comparison of open versus endovascular repair in good risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 222-224

  Becquemin, Jean Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA ANEURYSM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DEATH; DEVICE; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGISTER; REVIEW; RISK; SURGICAL PATIENT;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS;

EID: 67649236753     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.074     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Greenhalgh R.M., Brown L.C., Kwong G.P., Powell J.T., Thompson S.G., and EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364 (2004) 843-848
2. Prinssen M., Verhoeven E.L., Buth J., Cuypers P.W., van Sambeek M.R., Balm R., et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 1607-1618
3. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365 (2005) 2179-2186
4. Blankensteijn J.D., de Jong S.E., Prinssen M., van der Ham A.C., Buth J., van Sterkenburg S.M., et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 352 (2005) 2398-2405