L'Inventaire d'anxiete situationnelle et de trait d'anxiete (IASTA-Y): Structure factorielle et biais linguistique

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 115-120

  Vigneau, Francois ^a   Cormier, Stephanie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Bias; Factor structure; Inventaire d'anxiete situationnelle et de trait d'anxiete (iasta y); State trait anxiety inventory (stai)

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649233503     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014388     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
2. Benson, J., & Hocevar, D. (1985). The impact of item phrasing on the validity of attitude scales for elementary school children. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 231-240.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for Windows: User's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
4. Bentler, P. M., Jackson, D. N, & Messick, S. (1971). Identification of content and style: A two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 186-204.
5. Bernstein, I. H., & Eveland, D. C. (1982). State vs trait anxiety: A case study in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 361-372.
6. Bors, D. A., Vigneau, F., & Lalande, F. (2006). Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality, and the relation with ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 819-828.
7. Bouchard, S., Ivers, H., Gauthier, J. G., Pelletier, M.-H., & Savard, J. (1998). Psychometric properties of the French version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (form Y) adapted for older adults. Canadian Journal on Aging, 17, 440-453.
8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. J. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). London: Sage.
9. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
10. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-234.
12. Deltour, J. J. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire Mill Hill de J. C. Raven: adaptation frangaise et normes comparees du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices (PM38). Manuel et Annexes. Braine le Chateau (Belgique): Application des techniques modernes.
13. Gauthier, J., et Bouchard, S. (1993). Adaptation canadienne-francaise de la forme revisee du State-Trait Anxiety Inventory de Spielberger. Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 25, 559-578.
14. Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41-54.
15. Jackson, D. N. (1967). Acquiescence response styles: Problems in identification and control. In I. A. Berg (Eds.), Response set in personality assessment (pp. 71-111). Chicago: Aldine.
16. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
17. Marsh, H. W. (1986). The bias of negatively worded items in rating scales for young children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37-49.
18. Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819.
19. Matschinger, H., & Angermeyer, M. C. (1992). Effekte der Itempolung auf
20. das Antwortverhalten. Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 13, 97-110.
21. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Pilotte, W., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, SO, 603-610.
23. Raven, J. C. (1965). The Mill Hill vocabulary scale. London: H. K. Lewis. SAS Institute. (2004). SAS/STAT user's guide (Version 9.1). Cary, NC: Auteur. Schriesheim, C. A., & Hill, H. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1101-1114.
24. Shek, D. T. (1988). Reliability and factorial structure of the Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Psychopathol- ogy and Behavioral Assessment, 10, 303-317.
25. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. Spielberger, C. D., Vagg, P. R., Barker, L. R., Donham, G. W., & Westberry, L. G. (1980). The factor structure of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. In IG. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 7). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
27. Suzuki, T., Tsukamoto, K., & Abe, K. (2000). Characteristic factor structures of the Japanese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Coexistence of positive-negative and state-trait factor structures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 447-458.
28. Vagg, P. R., Spielberger, C. D., & O'Heam, T. P., Jr. (1980). Is the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory multidimensional? Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 207-214.
29. Vigneau, F., & Cormier, S. (2008). The factor structure of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: An alternative view. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 280-285.
30. Vigneau, F., et Lalande, F. (2006). Multidimensionnalite de l'Echelle de besoin de cognition - Note sur l'utilisation d'items negatifs dans un questionnaire de personnalite. Dans C. Houssemand, R. Martin, et P. Dickes (dir.), Perspectives de psychologie differentielle (pp. 267-272). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
31. Weems, G. H., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 166-176.