Assessment of the contribution of forests to the northeastern states of India

International Forestry Review

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 349-361

  Barik, Saroj K ^a   Mishra, S K ^a  

^a NORTH EASTERN HILL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Forest revenue model; Shifting cultivation; Strategic planning; Tangible and intangible forest benefits

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST PRODUCT; FOREST RESOURCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 67649229011     PISSN: 14655489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1505/ifor.10.2.349     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. BARIK, S.K. 2007: Spatial, and temporal variation in shifting cultivation in northeast India: is sustainable land use possible with jhum around? In K.G. Saxena, M. Pal and B.P. Singh (eds.). Shifting cultivation in south-east Asia, Mahendra Pal Bishen Pal Singh, Dehradum, India.
2. BARIK, S.K., and DARLONG, V.T. 2007. NRM policy environment in Meghalaya impacting the livelihood of rural poor. Centre for International Forestry. Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
3. BARIK, S.K., HARIDASAN, K., SANGMA, D.M., LAKADONG, J.N. and MANNERS, V. 2007. Developing medicinal plant sector in Meghalaya: an action plan. State Medicinal Plant Board, Shillong, India.
4. BHATTACHARJEE, R.P. 2005. Forest economics in Arunachal Pradesh and its impact on state economy. Arunachal Review. Information and Public Relations Department, Government of Arunachal Pradesh,. Itanagar.
5. CHOPRA, K., BHATTACHARYA, B.B., KUMAR P. 2002. Contribution of forestry sector to gross domestic product (GDP) in India (mimeo). Institute of Economic Growth, New Delhi, India.
6. CHOPRA, K. 2002. Economic valuation of biodiversity: the case of Keoladeo National Park. In G.K. Kadekodi (ed.) Environmental economics in practice: selected case studies from India (mimeo), Centre for Multi-Disciplinary Development Research, Dharwad, India.
7. GOVERNMENT OF MEGHALAYA 2003. Socio-economic review of Meghalaya, 2003. Government of Meghalaya, Shillong, India.
8. GOI 2007. Central Statistical Organization report, 2007, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
9. GREGERSEN, H.M., ARNOLD, J.E.M., LUNDGREN, A.L. and CONTRERAS-HERMOSILLA, A. 1995. Valuing forests: context, issues and guidelines, FAO Forestry Paper 127, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
10. HARIPRIYA, G.S. 2001. Carbon budget of Indian forest ecosystem. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
11. KADEKODI, G.K. 2002. Environmental economics in practice: selected case studies from India, (mimeo), Centre for Multi-Disciplinary Development Research, Dharwad, India.
12. MANOHARAN, T.R. 2000. Natural resource accounting: economic valuation of intangible benefits of forests, RIS Discussion paper #04/2000, Research and information system for the non-aligned and other developing countries, New Delhi, India.
13. MATHUR A.S., and SACHDEVA, A.S. 2003. Towards an economic approach to sustainable forest development. Working Paper 2/2003. Perspective planning division, Planning Commission, New Delhi.
14. NAEB 2002. National Afforestation Programme Guidelines, National Afforestation and Ecodevelopment Board (NAEB), Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
15. OKAFOR, J.C. 1979. Edible indigenous rural plants in the rural economy of the Nigerian rainforest ecosystem. University of Ibadan, Nigeria, pp 262-299.
16. SFR 1999. State of forest report, 1999. Forest Survey of India, Debradun, India.
17. TRIPATHI, R.S. and BARIK, S.K. 2004. Northeast ecoregion biodiversity strategy and action plan. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
18. VERMA, M. 2000. Economic valuation of forests of Himanchal Pradesh (mimeo). Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal, India.