LANNA tests and the prediction of Year 10 English and Mathematics results

Issues in Educational Research

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 25-33

  Hemmings, Brian ^a   Kay, Russell ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649159306     PISSN: 03137155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ai, X. (2002). Gender differences in growth in mathematics achievement: Three-level longitudinal and multilevel analyses of individual, home, and school influences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(1), 1-22.
2. Aiken, L.R. (1972). Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 359-385.
3. Akey, T.M. (2006). School context, student attitudes and behavior, and academic achievement: An exploratory analysis (Research Monograph). New York: MDRC. http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED489760
4. Ali, J. & McInerney, D.M. (2005, November). An analysis of the predictive validity of the Inventory of School Motivation (ISM). Paper presented at the Australian Association for Educational Research (AARE) Conference, Sydney, Australia.
5. Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dickie, J. (2000). Pacific nations students in primary teacher training: Investigating their learning needs. SET, 2, 11.
7. Grootenboer, P., & Hemmings, B. (2007). Mathematics performance and the role played by affective and background factors. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 3-20.
8. Hemmings, B.C. (1996). A longitudinal study of Australian secondary school achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 6(1), 13-37. http://www.iier.org.au/iier6/hemmings.html
9. Marks, G., & Ainley, J. (1997). Reading comprehension and numeracy among junior secondary school students in Australia. LSAY Research Report 3. Melbourne, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.
10. Mehta, P.D., Foorman, B.R., Branum-Martin, L, & Taylor, W.P. (2005). Literacy as a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and implications in a longitudinal study in Grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 85-116.
11. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2008). Assessing Student Achievement in Australia 2008. Melbourne, Vic.: MCEETYA.
12. Peng, C.J., Lee, K.L., & Ingersoll, G.M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3-14.
13. Reynolds, A.J. (1991). The middle schooling process: Influences on science and mathematics achievement from the longitudinal study of American youth. Adolescence, 16(101), 132-157.
14. Reynolds, A.J., & Walberg, H.J. (1992). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 371-382.
15. Rothman, S., & McMillan, J. (2003). Influences on achievement in literacy and numeracy. ACER Research Report 36: Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.
16. Rothman, S., & McMillan, J. (2004). Signposts to improved test scores in literacy and numeracy. EQ Australia, 1, 24-26.
17. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
18. Spinath, B., Spinath, F.M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363-374.
19. Thomas, J.P. (2002). An examination of the relationship between learning variables and academic achievement outcomes (Document No. TM 034 700). Grayslake, Illinois: College of Lake County (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 471 988).
20. Walker, M., & Chamberlain, M. (1999). A brief overview of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) including the conceptual framework for the study, sampling procedures, and a summary of key results for New Zealand. The Research Bulletin, 10(October), 41-55.
21. Wilkins, J.L.M., & Ma, X. (2003). Modeling change in student attitude toward and beliefs about mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 52-63.
22. Yates, S. (2000). Task involvement and ego orientation in mathematics achievement: A three-year follow-up. Issues in Educational Research, 10(1), 77-91. http://www.iier.org.au/iier10/yates.html