Minimality as vacuous distinctness: Evidence from cross-linguistic sentence comprehension

Lingua

Volumn 119, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1541-1559

  Bornkessel Schlesewsky, Ina ^a   Schlesewsky, Matthias ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distinctness; Extended Argument Dependency Model; Interference; Language comprehension; Minimality; Word order

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649132840     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Aissen J. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21 (2003) 435-483
2. Altmann G.T.M., and Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73 (1999) 247-264
3. Bisang W. From meaning to syntax - semantic roles and beyond. In: Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M., Comrie B., and Friederici A.D. (Eds). Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives (2006), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 191-236
4. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M. The role of prominence information in the real time comprehension of transitive constructions: a cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistics Compass, to appear.
5. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M., 2008. Unmarked transitivity: a processing constraint on linking. In: Van Valin, R.D., Jr. (Ed.), Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 413-434.
6. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M., von Cramon, D.Y. Word order and Broca's region: Evidence for a supra-syntactic perspective, submitted for publication.
7. Bornkessel, I., 2002. The Argument Dependency Model: A Neurocognitive Approach to Incremental Interpretation. 28. MPI Series in Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig.
8. Bornkessel I., Fiebach C.J., and Friederici A.D. On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach. Cognitive Brain Research 21 (2004) 11-21
9. Bornkessel I., and Schlesewsky M. The Extended Argument Dependency Model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 787-821
10. Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A.D. Grammar overrides frequency: evidence from the online processing of flexible word order. Cognition 85 (2002) B21-B30
11. Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A.D. Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: the role of inter- vs. intra-sentential predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29 (2003) 269-298
12. Bornkessel I., Zysset S., Friederici A.D., von Cramon D.Y., and Schlesewsky M. Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage 26 (2005) 221-233
13. Bresnan J. Lexical Functional Grammar (2001), Blackwell, Oxford
14. Burkhardt P. Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language 98 (2006) 159-168
15. Burkhardt P., and Roehm D. Differential effects of saliency: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters 413 (2007) 115-120
16. Burkhardt P., Fanselow G., and Schlesewsky M. Effects of (in)transitivity on structure building and agreement. Brain Research 1163 (2007) 100-110
17. Çaki{dotless}ci{dotless} R. Automatic induction of a CCG grammar for Turkish. Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop (2005), Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, Michigan 73-78
18. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
19. Chomsky N. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In: Martin R., Michaels D., and Uriagereka J. (Eds). Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 89-155
20. Comrie B. Linguistic Universals and Language Typology. 2nd ed. (1989), Blackwell, Oxford
21. Crocker M.W. On the nature of the principle-based sentence processor. In: Clifton Jr. C., Frazier L., and Rayner K. (Eds). Perspectives on Sentence Processing (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale 245-266
22. Croft W. Typology and universals. 2nd ed. (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Culicover P.W., and Jackendoff R. Simpler Syntax (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. de Vincenzi M. Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian (1991), Kluwer, Dordrecht
25. DeLancey S. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57 (1981) 626-657
26. Demiral S.B., Schlesewsky M., and Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I. On the universality of language comprehension strategies: evidence from Turkish. Cognition 106 (2008) 484-500
27. Demiral, Ş.B., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. Anticipating clause-final verbs: The interaction of prominence hierarchies in Turkish sentence comprehension, submitted for publication.
28. DuBois J.W. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63 (1987) 805-855
29. In: DuBois J.W., Kumpf L.E., and Ashby W.J. (Eds). Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function (2003), John Benjamins, Amsterdam
30. Ferreira F., and McClure K.K. Parsing of garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (1997) 273-306
31. Fiebach C.J., Schlesewsky M., and Friederici A.D. Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 250-272
32. Fodor J.D. Learning to parse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27 (1998) 285-319
33. Frazier L. Syntactic processing: evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5 (1987) 519-559
34. Frazier L., and Clifton Jr. C. Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In: Fodor J.D., and Ferreira F. (Eds). Reanalysis in Sentence Processing (1998), Kluwer, Dordrecht 143-176
35. Frazier L., and Flores d'Arcais G.B. Filler-driven parsing: a study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28 (1989) 331-344
36. Frazier L., and Fodor J.D. The sausage machine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6 (1978) 291-326
37. Frazier L., and Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 178-210
38. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 2 (2002) 78-84
39. Friederici A.D., Steinhauer K., Mecklinger A., and Meyer M. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology 47 (1998) 193-221
40. Garnsey S.M., Pearlmutter N.J., Myers M., and Lotocky M.A. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 58-93
41. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 (1998) 1-76
42. Gibson E. The dependency locality theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: Miyashita Y., Marantz A., and O'Neil W. (Eds). Image, Language, Brain (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 95-126
43. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Johnson M. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27 (2001) 1411-1423
44. Gorrell P. Syntax and Parsing (1995), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
45. Grewe T., Bornkessel I., Zysset S., Wiese R., von Cramon D.Y., and Schlesewsky M. Linguistic prominence and Broca's area: the influence of animacy as a linearization principle. Neuroimage 32 (2006) 1395-1402
46. Grewe T., Bornkessel I., Zysset S., Wiese R., von Cramon D.Y., and Schlesewsky M. The emergence of the unmarked: a new perspective on the language-specific function of Broca's area. Human Brain Mapping 26 (2005) 178-190
47. Grimshaw J. Projection heads and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28 (1997) 373-422
48. Grimshaw J. Locality and extended projection. In: Coopmans P., Everaert M., and Grimshaw J. (Eds). Lexical Specification and Insertion (2000), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 115-133
49. Inoue A., and Fodor J.D. Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In: Mazuka R., and Nagai N. (Eds). Japanese Sentence Processing (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 9-63
50. Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., and Haywood S.L. Prediction and thematic information in incremental sentence processing: evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 133-156
51. Kamide Y., and Mitchell D.C. Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 14 (1999) 631-662
52. Kimball J. Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2 (1973) 15-47
53. Kutas M., and Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207 (1980) 203-205
54. Kutas M., Van Petten C., and Kluender R. Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994-2005). In: Traxler M., and Gernsbacher M.A. (Eds). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 2nd ed. (2006), Elsevier, London 659-724
55. Lenerz J. Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen (1977), Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen
56. Lewis R.L., and Vasishth S. An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 1-45
57. Lewis R.L., Vasishth S., and Van Dyke J.A. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006) 447-454
58. McElree B. Accessing recent events. In: Ross B.H. (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vol. 46 (2006), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 155-200
59. Miller G.A. Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist 17 (1962) 748-762
60. Miller G.A., and Chomsky N. Finitary models of language users. In: Luce R.D., Bush R., and Galanter E. (Eds). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology Vol. 2 (1963), Wiley, New York
61. Miller G.A., and McKean K. A chronometric study of some relations between sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (1964) 297-308
62. Miyamoto E.T. Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31 (2002) 307-347
63. Müller G. Optimality, markedness and word order in German. Linguistics 37 (1999) 777-818
64. Osterhout L., Holcomb P., and Swinney D. Brain potentials elicited by garden path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20 (1994) 786-803
65. Pablos, L., 2006. Pre-verbal structure building in Romance languages and Basque. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
66. Pickering M.J., Traxler M., and Crocker M.W. Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43 (2000) 447-475
67. Pickering M.J., and Traxler M.J. Plausibility and the recovery from garden paths: an eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24 (1998) 940-961
68. Primus B. Cases and Thematic Roles (1999), Niemeyer, Tübingen
69. Rösler F., Pechmann T., Streb J., Röder B., and Hennighausen E. Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 38 (1998) 150-176
70. Rugg M.D., and Coles M.G.H. The ERP and cognitive psychology: conceptual issues. In: Rugg M.D., and Coles M.G.H. (Eds). Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford 27-39
71. Schlesewsky M., and Bornkessel I. On incremental interpretation: degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension. Lingua 114 (2004) 1213-1234
72. Schlesewsky M., and Bornkessel I. Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension. Brain Research 1098 (2006) 139-152
73. Schlesewsky M., Bornkessel I., and Frisch S. The neurophysiological basis of word order variations in German. Brain and Language 86 (2003) 116-128
74. Schlesewsky M., Fanselow G., Kliegl R., and Krems J. The subject preference in the processing of locally ambiguous wh-questions in German. In: Hemforth B., and Konieczny L. (Eds). German Sentence Processing (2000), Kluwer, Dordrecht 65-93
75. Schriefers H., Friederici A.D., and Kühn K. The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 499-520
76. Stabler E. The finite connectivity of linguistic structure. In: Clifton Jr. C., Frazier L., and Rayner K. (Eds). Perspectives on Sentence Processing (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale 303-336
77. Staub A. The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 33 (2007) 550-569
78. Staub A., Clifton Jr. C., and Frazier L. Heavy NP-shift is the parser's last resort: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 389-406
79. Sturt P., and Crocker M.W. Monotonic syntactic processing: a cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (1996) 449-494
80. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Kello C. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19 (1993) 528-553
81. Ura H. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
82. Van Valin Jr. R.D. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
83. von Heusinger K., and Kornfilt J. The case of the direct object in Turkish: semantics, syntax and morphology. Turkic Languages 9 (2005) 3-44
84. Wang, L., Schlesewsky, M., Bickel, B., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. Exploring the nature of the subject-preference: evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, in press.
85. Wolff, S., Schlesewsky, M., Hirotani, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. Ambiguity processing in head-final languages with argument drop: ERP evidence from Japanese, submitted for publication.
86. Wolff, S., Schlesewsky, M., Hirotani, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: electrophysiological evidence from Japanese. Brain and Language, in press.
87. Yamashita H. The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 26 (1997) 163-188