Intra- and interobserver variation in capsule endoscopy reviews;Intra- og interobservatøroverensstemmelse ved gennemsyn af kapselendoskopifilm

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 171, Issue 23, 2009, Pages 1929-1934

  Laursen, Emilie Lund ^a,b   Ersbøll, Annette Kjær ^a,b   Odgaard Rasmussen, Anne Mette ^a,b   Christensen, Else Hove ^a,b   Holm, Jakob ^a,b   Hansen, Mark Berner ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Kirurgisk Afdeling Bispe bjerg Hospital Kirurgisk Gastroenterologisk Afdeling K   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ENTEROPATHY; HUMAN; MEDICAL STAFF; NURSE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMALL INTESTINE; STANDARD;

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL DISEASES; INTESTINE, SMALL; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; NURSES; OBSERVER VARIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67649132514     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Consensus statement, ICCE 2006, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. ww.icce.info/consensus.html (1.december 2008).
2. Christensen LA, Dahlerup JF, Poulsen PB et al. Kapselendoskopi ved diagnostik i tyndtarmen - en medicinsk teknologivurdering. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, Enhed for Medicinsk Teknologivurdering, 2007.
3. Levinthal GN, Burke CA, Santisi JM. The accuracy of an endoscopy nurse in interpreting capsule endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2669-71.
4. Petroniene R, Dubcenco E, Baker JP et al. Given capsule endoscopy in celiac disease: Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:685-94.
5. Chen GC, Enayati P, Tran T et al. Sensitivity and inter-observer variability for capsule endoscopy image analysis in a cohort of novice readers. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:1249-54.
6. Niv Y, Niv G. Capsule endoscopy examination - preliminary review by a nurse. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50: 2121-4.
7. Lai LH, Wong G, Chow D et al. Inter-observer variations on interpretation of capsule endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:283-6.
8. Ewertsen C, Svendsen CB, Svendsen LB et al. Er screening af kapselendoskopiske undersøgelser udført af ikkelægeligt personale anvendelig? Ugeskr Læger 2006;168:3530.
9. Horton K, Reffel A, Rosen K et al. Training of nurse practitioners and physician assistants to perform screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2001;13:455-9.
10. Goodfellow PB, Fretwell IA, Simms JM. Nurse endoscopy in a district general hospital. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 2003;85:181-4.
11. Korman LY, Delvaux M, Gay G et al. Capsule endoscopy structured terminology (CEST): Proposal of a standardized and structured terminology for reporting capsule endoscopy procedures. Endoscopy 2005;37:951-9.
12. Delveaux M, Crespi M. Computer Committee of ESGE. Minimal standard terminology in digestive endoscopy. Endoscopy 2002;32:162-88.
13. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2. Ed. New York: Wiley, 1981.
14. Scally AJ, Brealy S. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for studies of film-reading performance. Clin Radiol 2003;58:238-46.
15. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
16. Brealy S, Scally AJ. Bias in plain film reading performance studies. Br J Radiol 2001;74:307-16.
17. Delveaux M, Friedman S, Keuchel M et al. Structured terminology for capsule endoscopy: results of retrospective testing and validation in 766 small-bowel investigations. Endoscopy 2005;37:945-50.