Expressives and identity conditions

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 356-366

  Potts, Christopher ^a   Asudeh, Ash ^b   Cable, Seth ^a   Hara, Yurie ^c   McCready, Eric ^d   Alonso Ovalle, Luis ^e   Bhatt, Rajesh ^a   Davis, Christopher ^a   Kratzer, Angelika ^a   Roeper, Tom ^a   Walkow, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d AOYAMA GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649130312     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.356     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aoun, Joseph, and Lina Choueiri. 2000. Epithets. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18:1-39.
2. Aoun, Joseph, Lina Choueiri, and Norbert Hornstein. 2001. Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 32:371-403.
3. Boeckx, Cedric, and Fumikazu Niinuma. 2004. Conditions on agreement in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 453-480.
4. Bůring, Daniel. 2005. Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Chung, Sandra. 2000. Close encounters with pronouns in VP ellipsis. Available at http://ling.ucsc.edu/Jorge/chung.html.
6. Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Harada, S. I. 1976. Honorifics. In Japanese generative grammar, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 499-561. Syntax and Semantics 5. New York: Academic Press.
9. Kaplan, David. 1999. What is meaning? Explorations in the theory of Meaning as Use. Brief version-draft 1. Ms., UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
10. Lasnik, Howard. 1989. Essays on binding and anaphora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Nishiyama, Kunio, and Eun Cho. 1998. Predicate cleft constructions in Japanese and Korean: The role of dummy verbs in TP/VP-preposing. In Japanese/Korean linguistics 7, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, Hajime Hoji, Shoichi Iwasaki, and Sung-Ock Sohn, 463-479. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
12. Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Potts, Christopher. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33:165-197.
14. Potts, Christopher, and Shigeto Kawahara. 2004. The performative content of Japanese honorifics. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14, ed. by Kazuha Watanabe and Robert B. Young, 235-254. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
15. Potts, Christopher, and Tom Roeper. 2006. The narrowing acquisition path: From declarative to expressive small clauses. In The syntax of nonsententials: Multi-disciplinary perspectives, ed. by Ljiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles-Suárez, and Ellen Barton, 183-201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Kyle Rawlins. 2007. Argument or no argument? Linguistics and Philosophy 30:277-287.
17. Schwarz, Florian. 2008. Two types of definites. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, 3-6 January.
18. Sells, Peter, and Jong-Bok Kim. 2007. Korean honorification: A kind of expressive meaning. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16: 303-336.
19. Srivastav, Veneeta. 1991. The syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:637-686.