Socio-genetic structure and mating system of a wild boar population

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 278, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 116-125

  Poteaux, C ^a   Baubet, E ^b   Kaminski, G ^a,b   Brandt, S ^b   Dobson, F S ^c,d   Baudoin, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^b OFFICE NATIONAL DE LA CHASSE ET DE LA FAUNE SAUVAGE   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic structure; Matrilines; Polygyny; Social organization; Wild boar

Indexed keywords

ADULT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; MORTALITY; PIG; POLYGYNY; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION; WILD POPULATION;

ARC EN BARROIS; CHAMPAGNE-ARDENNE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; HAUTE MARNE; WESTERN EUROPE;

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 67649112579     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00553.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aguilera-Reyes, U., Zavala-Páramo, G., Valdez-Alarcón, J.J., Cano-Camacho, H., García-López, G. Pescador-Salas, N. (2006). Multiple mating and paternity determinations in domestic swine (Sus scrofa). Anim. Res. 55, 409 417.
2. Archie, E.A., Moss, C.J. Alberts, S. (2006). The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 273, 513 522. (Pubitemid 46768054)
3. Baubet, E., Brandt, S., Jullien, J.M. Vassant, J. (1994). Valeur de la denture pour la détermination de l'âge chez le sanglier (Sus scrofa). Gibier Faune Sauvage 11, 119 132.
4. ™ software for population genetics. Laboratoire Génome et Populations, Montpellier II University, Montpellier, France.
5. Beuerle, W. (1975). Field observations of aggressive sexual behaviour in European wild hog (Sus scrofa L.). Zeit. Tierpsych. 39, 211 258.
6. Boitani, L., Mattei, L., Nonis, D. Corsi, F. (1994). Spatial and activity patterns of wild boars in Tuscany, Italy. J. Mammal. 75, 600 612. (Pubitemid 2137883)
7. Brandt, S., Vassant, J. Jullien, J.M. (1998). Domaine vital diurne des sangliers en forêt de Châteauvillain - Arc-en-Barrois. Bull. Mens. Office Chasse 234, 4 11.
8. Burton, C. (2002). Microsatellite analysis of multiple paternity and male reproductive success in the promiscuous snowshoe hare. Can. J. Zool. 80, 1948 1956. (Pubitemid 36380310)
9. Calenge, C., Maillard, D., Vassant, J. Brandt, S. (2002). Summer and hunting season home ranges of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in two habitats in France. Game Wildl. Sci. 19, 281 301.
10. Carling, M.D., Wiseman, P.A. Byersa, J.A. (2003). Microsatellite analysis reveals multiple paternity in a population of wild pronghorn antelopes (Antilocapra americana). J. Mammal. 84, 1237 1243. (Pubitemid 37514975)
11. Carranza, J. (1996). Sexual selection for male body mass and the evolution of litter size in mammals. Am. Nat. 148, 81 100. (Pubitemid 27048322)
12. Chesser, R.K. (1991a). Gene diversity and female philopatry. Genetics 127, 437 447.
13. Chesser, R.K. (1991b). Influence of gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations. Genetics 129, 573 583.
14. Clutton-Brock, T.H. (1989). Mammalian mating systems. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 236, 339 372.
15. Coltman, D.W. (2007). Molecular ecological approaches to studying the evolutionary impact of selective harvesting in wildlife. Mol. Ecol. 17, 221 235.
16. Cornuet, J.M. Luikart, G. (1996). Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144, 2001 2014. (Pubitemid 26427944)
17. Dallas, J., Dod, B., Boursot, P., Prager, E.M. Bonhomme, F. (1995). Population subdivision and gene flow in Danish house mice. Mol. Ecol. 4, 311 320.
18. Delcroix, I., Mauget, R. Signoret, J.P. (1990). Existence of synchronisation of reproduction at the level of the social group of the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). J. Reprod. Fertil. 89, 613 617. (Pubitemid 20238677)
19. Delgado, R., Fernandéz-Llario, P., Azevedo, M., Beja-Pereira, A. Santos, P. (2008). Paternity assessment in free-ranging wild boar (Sus scrofa) - are littermates full-sibs? Mammal Biol. 73, 169 176.
20. Dobson, F.S. (1982). Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim. Behav. 30, 1183 1192.
21. Dobson, F.S. Zinner, B. (2003). Social groups, genetic structure, and conservation. In : Animal Behavior and Wildlife Conservation : 211 228. Festa-Bianchet, M. Apollonia, M. (Eds). Washington D.C. : Island Press.
22. Dobson, F.S. (2007). Gene dynamics and social behaviour. In Rodent societies : 163 172. Wolff, J.O. Sherman, P.W. (Eds). Illinois : University of Chicago Press.
23. Drake, A., Fraser, D. Weary, D.M. (2008). Parent-offspring resource allocation in domestic pigs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 309 319. (Pubitemid 350292559)
24. Emlen, S.T. Oring, L.W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215 223. (Pubitemid 8130430)
25. Fruzinski, B. Labudzki, L. (2002). Management of wild boar in Poland. Z. Jagdwiss. 48, 201 207. (Pubitemid 36844745)
26. Gabor, T.M., Hellengren, E.C., Van Den Bussche, R.A. Silvy, N.J. (1999). Demography, socio-spatial behaviour and genetics of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a semi-arid environment. J. Zool. (Lond.) 247, 311 322. (Pubitemid 29194856)
27. Gaillard, J.-M., Pontier, D., Brandt, S., Jullien, J.-M. Allainé, D. (1992). Sex differentiation in postnatal growth rate: a test in a wild boar population. Oecologia 90, 167 171. (Pubitemid 23404722)
28. Goulding, M.J. (1998). Current Status and Potential Impact of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the English Countryside: a Risk Assessment. Report to Conservation Management Division C, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. March 1998.
29. Greenwood, P.J. (1980). Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28, 1140 1162.
30. Hampton, J., Pluske, J. Spencer, P. (2004). A preliminary genetic study of the social biology of feral pigs in south-western Australia and the implication for management. Wildl. Res. 31, 375 381. (Pubitemid 39275268)
31. Hardy, O.J. Vekemans, X. (2002). SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2, 618 620. (Pubitemid 35436766)
32. Hoogland, J.L. (1998). Why do female Gunnison's prairie dogs copulate with more than one male? Anim. Behav. 55, 351 359. (Pubitemid 28165236)
33. Jones, A.G. (2001). Gerud 1.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from progeny arrays using multilocus DNA data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 1, 215 218. (Pubitemid 33691715)
34. Jullien, J.M., Vassant, J., Delorme, D. Brandt, S. (1988). Techniques de capture de sangliers. Bull. Mens. Office Chasse 122, 28 35.
35. Kaminski, G., Brandt, S., Baubet, E. Baudoin, C. (2005). Life-history patterns in female wild boars (Sus scrofa L., 1758): mother-daughter postweaning associations. Can. J. Zool. 83, 474 480. (Pubitemid 41026502)
36. Komers, P.E. Brotherton, P.N. (1997). Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 264, 1261 1270. (Pubitemid 27445222)
37. Lacey, E.A., Wieczorek, J.R. Tucker, P.K. (1997). Male mating behaviour and patterns of sperm precedence in Arctic ground squirrels. Anim. Behav. 53, 767 779. (Pubitemid 27186183)
38. Lane, J.E., Boutin, S., Gunn, M.R., Slate, J. Coltman, D.W. (2007). Relatedness of mates does not predict patterns of parentage in North American red squirrels. Anim. Behav. 74, 611 619. (Pubitemid 47404522)
39. Loiselle, B.A., Sork, V.L., Nason, J. Graham, C. (1995). Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am. J. Botany 82, 1420 1425. (Pubitemid 3002677)
40. Maillard, D. Fournier, P. (1995). Effects of shooting with hounds on size of resting range of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) groups in Mediterranean habitat. J. Mount. Ecol. 3, 102 107.
41. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E. Pemberton, J.M. (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7, 639 655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
42. Martys, M.F. (1991). Social organisation and behaviour in the Suidae and Tassuidae. In Biology of Suidae : 65 77. Barrett, R.H. Spitz, F. (Eds). Toulouse : Institut de Recherche sur les Grands Mammifères.
43. Matschke, G.H. (1967). Aging European wild hogs by dentition. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 31, 109 113.
44. Mauget, R., Campan, R., Spitz, F., Dardaillon, M., Goneau, G. Pépin, D. (1984). Synthèse des connaissances actuelles sur la biologie du sanglier, perspectives de recherche. Symp. Int. sur le sanglier, Colloque INRA 22, 15 50.
45. Milner, J.M., Nilsen, E.B. Andreassen, H.P. (2007). Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conserv. Biol. 21, 36 47. (Pubitemid 46254027)
46. Monzón, A. Bento, P. (2004). An analysis of the hunting pressure on wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Trás-os-Montes region of northern Portugal. In Wild Boar Research (2002). A selection and edited papers from the "4th International Wild boar Symposium". Fonseca, C., Herrero, J., Luís, A. Soares, A.M. (Eds). Galemys 16, 253 262.
47. Parker, P.G. Waite, T.A. (1997). Mating systems, effective population size, and conservation of natural populations. In Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild : 243 261. Clemmons, J.R. Buchholz, R. (Eds). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
48. Piry, S., Luikart, G. Cornuet, J.M. (1999). Bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J. Hered. 90, 502 503. (Pubitemid 29416458)
49. Queller, D.C. Goodnight, K.F. (1989). Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43, 258 275.
50. Raymond, M. Rousset, F. (1995). Genepop. version 1.2 population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248 249.
51. Robic, A., Riquet, J. Yerle, M., Milan, D., Lahbib-Mansais, Y., Dubut-Fontana, C. Gellin, J. (1996). Porcine linkage and cytogenetic maps integrated by regional mapping of 100 microsatellites on somatic cell hybrid panel. Mammal Genome 7, 438 45. (Pubitemid 126441251)
52. Servanty, S., Gaillard, J.-M., Allainé, D., Brandt, S. Baubet, E. (2007). Litter size and fetal sex ratio adjustment in a highly polytocous species: the wild boar. Behav. Ecol. 18, 427 432. (Pubitemid 46363266)
53. Sodeikat, G. Pohlmeyer, K. (2003). Escape movements of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany. Wildl. Biol. 9, 43 49. (Pubitemid 38192589)
54. Spencer, P., Lapidge, S., Hampton, J. Pluske, J. (2005). The socio-genetic structure of a controlled feral pig population. Wildl. Res. 32, 297 304. (Pubitemid 41127440)
55. Sugg, D.W. Chesser, R.K. (1994). Effective population sizes with multiple paternity. Genetics 137, 1147 1155. (Pubitemid 24235627)
56. Sugg, D.W., Chesser, R.K., Dobson, F.S. Hoogland, J.L. (1996). Population genetics meets behavioral ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 11, 338 342. (Pubitemid 27003429)
57. Vassant, J. Brandt, S. (1995). Adaptation du piégeage par enclos-piège de type corral pour la capture de compagnies de sangliers (Sus scrofa). Gibier Faune Sauvage, Game Wildl. 12, 51 61.
58. Vernesi, C., Crestanello, B. Pecchioli, E., Tartari, D., Caramelli, D., Hauffe, H. Bertorelle, G. (2003). The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): a microsatellite study. Mol. Ecol. 12, 585 595. (Pubitemid 36380418)
59. Weir, B.S. Cockerham, C.C. (1984). Estimating F statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358 1370. (Pubitemid 16277759)