Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 125, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 3522-3525

  Cutler, Anne ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NON-NATIVE;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; NETHERLANDS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOWEL; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MULTILINGUALISM; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 67649112394     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3117434     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bond, Z., and Small, L. H. (1983). " Voicing, vowel, and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech.," Percept. Psychophys. 34, 470-474.
2. Broersma, M. (2005). " Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 3890-3901. 10.1121/1.1906060
3. Broersma, M. (2008). " Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 712-715. 10.1121/1.2940578
4. Cooper, N., Cutler, A., and Wales, R. (2002). " Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners.," Lang Speech 45, 207-228. 10.1177/00238309020450030101
5. Cutler, A. (1986). " Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access.," Lang Speech 29, 201-220.
6. Cutler, A. (2005). " Lexical stress.," in The Handbook of Speech Perception, edited by, D. B. Pisoni, and, R. E. Remez, (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 264-289.
7. Cutler, A., and Clifton, C. (1984). " The use of prosodic information in word recognition.," in Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, edited by, H. Bouma, and, D. G. Bouwhuis, (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 183-196.
8. Cutler, A., and van Donselaar, W. (2001). " Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch.," Lang Speech 44, 171-195. 10.1177/00238309010440020301 (Pubitemid 33600241)
9. Cutler, A., Norris, D., and Sebastián-Galĺs, N. (2004). " Phonemic repertoire and similarity within the vocabulary.," in Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, edited by, S. H. Kim, and, D. H. Youn, (Sunjin Printing Co., Seoul), Vol. 1, pp. 65-68.
10. Cutler, A., and Pasveer, D. (2006). " Explaining cross-linguistic differences in effects of lexical stress on spoken-word recognition.," in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Speech Prosody, edited by, R. Hoffman, and, H. Mixdorff, (TUD, Dresden), pp. 250-254.
11. Fear, B. D., Cutler, A., and Butterfield, S. (1995). " The strong/weak syllable distinction in English.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1893-1904. 10.1121/1.412063
12. Friedrich, C. K. (2002). " Prosody and spoken word recognition-Behavioral and ERP correlates.," Ph.D. thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig.
13. Slowiaczek, L. M. (1990). " Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition.," Lang Speech 33, 47-68.
14. Slowiaczek, L. M. (1991). " Stress and context in auditory word recognition.," J. Psycholinguist. Res. 20, 465-481. 10.1007/BF01067638
15. Small, L. H., Simon, S. D., and Goldberg, J. S. (1988). " Lexical stress and lexical access: Homographs versus nonhomographs.," Percept. Psychophys. 44, 272-280. (Pubitemid 18201560)
16. van der Hulst, H. G. (1999). " Word accent.," in Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe, H. G. van der Hulst, (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin), pp. 3-116.
17. van Donselaar, W., Koster, M., and Cutler, A. (2005). " Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition.," Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 58, 251-273. (Pubitemid 40251405)
18. van Heuven, V. J. (1985). " Perception of stress pattern and word recognition: Recognition of Dutch words with incorrect stress position.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, S21. 10.1121/1.2022696