Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners

Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 6-13

  Squadrone, R ^a   Gallozzi, C ^a,b  

^a National Olympic Committee   (Italy)

^b Italian National Olympic Committee   (Italy)

Author keywords

Exercise test; Oxygen consumption; Shoes; Running

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOOT; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; RUNNING; SHOE; STANDARD; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FOOT; HUMANS; MALE; RUNNING; SHOES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 67649094967     PISSN: 00224707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bruggermann G-P, Potthast W, NiehoffA, Braunstein B, Assheuer J. Adaptation of morphology and function of the intrinsic foot and shank muscle to mechanical loading induced through footwear. In: Subie A, Kjihashi S, editors. The impact of technology on sport. Melbourne: ASTA; 2005. p. 505-510
2. th edition. Denver, CO: Supertraining International; 1999.
3. 3.ClementDB,TauntonJE,SmartGW,McNicolL.Asurveyofoveruserunninginjuries. PhysSportsMed1981;9:47-58.(Pubitemid11069582)
4. 4.ClementDB,TauntonJE,SmartGW.Achillestendinitisandperitendinitis; etiologyandtreatment.AmJSportsMed1984;12:179-184(Pubitemid14107512)
5. Cook SD, Brinker MR, Mahlon P. Running shoes: their relation to running injuries. Sports Med 1990;10:1-8
6. van Mechelen W. Running injuries: a review of the epidemiological literature. Sports Med 1992;14:320-35
7. Robbins SE, Hanna AM. Running-related injury prevention through barefoot adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987;19:148-56
8. Divert C, Mornieux G, Baur H, Mayer F, Belli A. Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running. Int J Sports Med 2005;26:593-8
9. De Wit B, De Clercq D, Aerts P. Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech 2000;33:269-78
10. Freychat P, Belli A, Carret JP, Lacour JR. Relationship between rear-foot and forefoot orientation and ground reaction forces during run-ning. Med Sei Sports Exerc 1996;28:225-32
11. Komi PV, Gollhofer A, Schmidtbleicher D, Frick U. Interaction between man and shoe in running: considerations for a more com-prehensive measurement approach. Int J Sports Med 1987;8:196-202
12. Nilsson J, Thorstensson A. Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. Acta Physiol Scand 1989;136:217-27.
13. Miller, D. Ground reaction forces in distance running. In: Cavanagh PR, editor. Biomechanics of distance running. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1990, p. 203-2 4
14. Bates BT, Osternig LR, Mason BR, James SL. Functional variability of the lower extremity during the support phase of running. Med Sci Sports 1979;11:328-31
15. Nyska M, McCabe C, Linge K, Klenerman L. Plantar foot pressures during treadmill walking with high-heel and low-heel shoes. Foot Ankle Int 1996;17:662-6
16. Cavanagh PR. The running shoe book. Mountain View, CA: Anderson World, Inc; 1980
17. Duffield R, Dawson B, Pinnington HC, Wong P. Accuracy and reliability of a Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system. J Sci Med Sport 2004;7:11-22
18. Eisenmann JC, Brisko N, Shadrick D, Welsh S. Comparative analysis of the Cosmed Quark b2 and K4b2 gas analysis systems during sub-maximal exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2003;43:150-5
19. Dickinson JA, Cook SD, Leinhardt TM. The measurement of shock waves following heel strike while running. J Biomech 1985;18:415--22
20. Robbins S, Gouw G, McClaran J, Waked E. Protective sensation of the plantar aspect of the foot. Foot Ankle 1993;14:347-52
21. Bates B, Osternig J, Sawhill J, James S. An assessment of subject variability, subject-shoe interaction, and the evaluation of running shoes using ground reaction force data. J Biomech 1983;16:181-91
22. Belli A, Lacour JR, Komi PV, Candau R, Denis C. Mechanical step variability during treadmill running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995;70:510-7
23. Hamill J, McNiven SL. Reliability of selected ground reaction force parameters during walking. Hum Mov Sei 1990;9:117-31
24. Rodano R, Squadrone R. Stability of selected lower limb joint kinet-ic parameters. J Appl Biomech 2002;18:83-9
25. Robbins SE, Gouw GJ. Athletic footwear and chronic overloading: a brief review. Sports Med 1990;9:76-85
26. Hennig EM, Valiant GA, Liu Q. Biomechanical variables and per-ception of cushioning for running in various types of footwear. J Appl Biomech 1996;12:143-50
27. Flaherty RF. Running economy and kinematic differences among runners with foot shod, with the foot bare, and with the barefoot equalled for weight. Eugene, Oregon: Mikroform Publications. Int Institute Sport and Human Performance; 1994
28. Fredrick EC. Sport shoes and playing surfaces. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 1984
29. Nigg BM, Segesser B, Biomechanical and orthopaedic concepts in sport shoe construction. Med Sei Sports Exerc 1992;24:595-602
30. Nigg BM. The role of impact forces and foot pronation: a new para-digm. Clin J Sport Med 2001;11:2-9
31. 2 and selected frontal plane kinematics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985;17:158-63
32. Frederick EC. Kinematically mediated effects of sports shoe design: a review. J Sports Sci 1986;4:169-84
33. Grant S, Wilson NJ, Thomson R, WhittakerAR, Aitchison T, Smyth N. The effect of the engineering properties of treadmill surfaces on the per-formance of athletes in a sub-maximal test. Sports Eng 1998;1:57-62
34. Van Gheluwe B, Tielemans R, Roosen P. The influence of heel counter rigidity on rearfoot motion during running. J Appl Biomech 1995;11:47-67