The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 125, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 3722-3732

  Voix, J́ŕmie ^a   Laville, Fŕd́ric ^a  

^a ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE MEASUREMENT; CORRECTION FACTORS; FIELD CALIBRATION; FIELD PERFORMANCE; FURTHER DEVELOPMENT; HEARING PROTECTION; HEARING PROTECTION DEVICES; NOISE REDUCTIONS; OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT;

EAR PROTECTORS;

LIGHT MEASUREMENT;

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; CALIBRATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATION; MEASUREMENT; MICROPHONE; NOISE REDUCTION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; VALIDITY;

ALGORITHMS; EAR CANAL; EAR PROTECTIVE DEVICES; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; NOISE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 67649090666     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3125769     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. E. H. Berger, in Noise-Con 81, edited by, F. D. Hart, L. H. Royster, and, N. D. Stewart, (Noise Control Foundation, New York, NY, 1981), pp. 147-152.
2. E. H. Berger, " Can real-world hearing protector attenuation be estimated using laboratory data?," Sound Vib. 0038-1810 22, 26-31 (1988).
3. E. H. Berger, J. R. Franks, and F. Lindgren, " International review of field studies of hearing protector attenuation.," Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, edited by, A. Axlesson, H. Borchgrevink, R. P. Hamernik, P. Hellstrom, D. Henderson, and, R. J. Salvi, (Thieme Medical Pub., Inc., New York, NY, 1996), pp. 361-377.
4. E. H. Berger, " EARLog #20-The naked truth about NRRs. " (E-A-R Hearing Protection Products, Indianapolis, IN, 1993).
5. American National Standards Institute, ANSI S3.19-1974 (R 1990), American National Standard Methods for the measurement of real-ear protection of hearing protectors and physical attenuation of earmuffs (1974).
6. NIOSH, Criteria for a recommended standard-Occupational noise exposure (1998).
7. American National Standard Institute, ANSI S12.6-1997 (R2002), American National Standard Methods for measuring the real-ear attenuation of hearing protector New York (1997).
8. Australian/New Zealand Standard, AS/NZS1270:2002, Acoustics-Hearing protectors, Sydney, NSW (2002).
9. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TS 4869-5:2006, Acoustics-Hearing protectors-Part 5: Method for estimation of noise reduction using fitting by inexperienced test subjects, Switzerland (2006).
10. E. H. Berger, J. R. Franks, A. Behar, J. G. Casali, C. Dixon-Ernst, R. W. Kieper, C. J. Merry, B. T. Mozo, C. W. Nixon, D. Ohlin, J. D. Royster, and L. H. Royster, " Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 103, 665-672 (1998). 10.1121/1.423236
11. J. D. Royster, E. H. Berger, C. J. Merry, C. W. Nixon, J. R. Franks, A. Behar, J. G. Casali, C. Dixon-Ernst, R. W. Kieper, B. T. Mozo, D. Ohlin, and L. H. Royster, " Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 99, 1506-1526 (1996). 10.1121/1.414729
12. E. H. Berger, " In search of meaningful measures of hearing protector effectiveness.," in 21st Annual Conference of the National Hearing Conservation Association, San Francisco, CA (1996).
13. E. H. Berger, " EARLog #21-Hearing protector testing-Let's get real [Using the new ANSI Method-B data and the NRR(SF)]. " (E-A-R Hearing Protection Products, Indianapolis, IN, 1999).
14. E. H. Berger and R. W. Kieper, " ANSI S12.6-1997 Method-B testing of custom earmolds and its effect on the testing of other earplugs.," Technical Report E-A-R 04-15/HP Version 2.1, EAR/Aearo Company, Indianapolis, IN, 2005.
15. J. R. Franks, W. J. Murphy, D. A. Harris, J. L. Johnson, and P. B. Shaw, " Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance.," Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 64, 501-509 (2003). 10.1080/15428110308984846 (Pubitemid 37010814)
16. E. H. Berger, " Exploring procedures for field testing the fit of earplugs.," in Industrial Hearing Conservation Conference (University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 1989).
17. A. Kusy and A. Damongeot, " Mesure des performances acoustiques des bouchons d'oreille. Essai d'application de la technique MIRE (Microphone in the real ear).," Technical Report ND 2023, Cahier de notes documentaires no. 164, Institut National de Recherche et de ścurit́, Paris, France, 1996, pp. 287-292.
18. K. Michael, " Measurement of insert-type hearing protector attenuation on the end-user: A practical alternative to relying on the NRR.," Spectrum-National Hearing Conservation Association (NHCA) Publications 16, pp. 13-17 (1998).
19. K. Michael and D. C. Byrne, " Current state of insert-type hearing protector fit-testing: Follow-on measurements in the steel industry and fit-testing in a mobile environment.," Spectrum-National Hearing Conservation Association (NHCA) Publications 19, pp. 14-16 (2002).
20. W. J. Murphy, J. R. Franks, and D. A. Harris, " Evaluation of a FitCheck hearing protector test system.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 106, 2263 (1999). 10.1121/1.427717
21. ANSI, (1957). " Method for the Measurement of Real-Ear Attenuation of Ear Protectors at Threshold.," American National Standards Institute, Z24.22-1957 (R1971), New York.
22. Canadian Standards Association, CSA Z94.2-02, Hearing Protection Devices-Performance, Selection, Care, and Use, Toronto, ON (2002).
23. International Standard Organization, ISO 4869-1 (1990), Acoustics-Hearing protectors-Part 1: Subjective method for the measurement of sound attenuation (1990).
24. E. H. Berger, " Techniques for Measuring Hearing Protector Attenuation and the correct answer is?," in 30th Annual NHCA Hearing Conservation Conference (NHCCS Association, Tucson, AZ, 2005).
25. E. H. Berger, " Review and tutorial-methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 79, 1655-1687 (1986). 10.1121/1.393228
26. E. H. Berger, " Preferred methods for measuring hearing protector attenuation.," InterNOISE 2005, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2005).
27. D. W. Mauney, " Investigation of physical and psychological methods for the attenuation measurement of circumaural hearing protectors with implications for field use.," Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnique Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA (1994).
28. ANSI S12.42-1995 (R2004), American National Standard microphone-in-real- ear and acoustic test fixture methods for the measurement of insertion loss of hearing protection devices, American National Standard Institute, New York (1995).
29. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 11904-1 (2002), Acoustics-Determination of sound emission from sound sources placed close to the ear. Part 1: Technique using a microphone in the real ear (MIRE) technique, Switzerland (2000).
30. P. B. Madsen, " Insertion gain optimization.," Hearing Instruments 37, 28-32 (1986).
31. J. G. Casali, D. W. Mauney, and J. A. Burks, " Physical versus psychophysical measurement of hearing protector attenuation-a.k.a. MIRE vs. REAT.," Sound Vib. 0038-1810 29, 20-27 (1993).
32. J. Pretzschner and A. Moreno, " Field evaluation of ear-muffs: Which is more suitable-insertion loss or transmission loss?," Appl. Acoust. 0003-682X 24, 129-143 (1988). 10.1016/0003-682X(88)90035-7
33. J. Voix and F. Laville, " Expandable Earplug With Smart Custom Fitting Capabilities.," InterNOISE 2002, Dearborn, MI (2002).
34. J. G. Casali and S. Gerges, " Hearing in noise: Effects upon, protection, and enhancement.," in Review of Human Factors, Review of Human Factors, edited by, R. C. Williges, (Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, 2005).
35. J. Voix, F. Laville, and J. Zeidan, " Filter selection to adapt earplug performances to sound exposure.," Can. Acoust. 30, 122-124 (2002).
36. J. Voix and F. Laville, " Prediction of the attenuation of altered custom earplug.," Appl. Acoust. 0003-682X 70, 935-944 (2009). 10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.12.004
37. W. Murphy, EPHB Survey Report 312-11a in Advanced Hearing Protector Study: Conducted at General Motors Metal Fabrication Division, Flint Metal Center, Flint, Michigan, 2006. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
38. J. Voix and F. Laville, " Method and apparatus for determining in situ the acoustic seal provided by an in-ear device.," U.S. Patent No. 6,687,377 (2004).
39. J. Voix and F. Laville, " Method and apparatus for customizing in situ an in-ear device.," U.S. Patent No. 2,000,123,146 (2005).
40. J. Voix and F. Laville, " New method and device for customizing in situ a hearing protector.," Can. Acoust. 32, 86-87 (2004).
41. EPA, Noise Labeling Requirements for Hearing Protectors (Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1979).
42. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 4869-2 (1994), Acoustics-Hearing protectors-Part 2: Estimation of effective A-weighted sound pressure levels when hearing protectors are worn (1994).
43. P. Hamery, A. Dancer, and G. Evrard, " Étude et ŕalisation de bouchons d'oreilles perfoŕs non-lińaires (study and development of non-linear perforated earplugs).," Technical Report No. R128/97, Institut Franco-Allemand de recherches de Saint-Louis, France, 1997.
44. R. Pääkkönen, S. Savolainen, J. Myllyniem, and K. Lehtomäki, " Ear plug fit and attenuation-An experimental study.," Acust. Acta Acust. 1436-7947 86, 481-484 (2000). (Pubitemid 30958730)
45. J. Schroeter and C. Poesselt, " The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 80, 505-527 (1986). 10.1121/1.394046 (Pubitemid 16077447)
46. E. H. Berger and J. E. Kerivan, " Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 74, 81-94 (1983). 10.1121/1.389621 (Pubitemid 13574105)
47. E. H. Berger, J. Voix, and R. W. Kieper, " Methods of developing and validating a field-MIRE approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.," Spectrum-National Hearing Conservation Association (NHCA) Publications 24, Supplement 1, p. 22 (2007).
48. E. H. Berger, R. W. Kieper, and D. Gauger, " Hearing protection: Surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 114, 1955-1967 (2003). 10.1121/1.1605415
49. J. Voix, " Mise au point d'un bouchon d'oreille " intelligent" (Development of a "smart" earplug).," Ph.D. thesis, École de Technologie Suṕrieure, Montŕal, Canada (2006).
50. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 4869-3:2007 Acoustics-Part 3: Measurement of insertion loss of hearing protectors, Switzerland (2007).
51. ANSI, ANSI S12.68-2007, Methods of estimating effective A -weighted sound pressure levels when hearing protectors are worn, American National Standard Institute, New York (2007).
52. J. Voix and L. D. Hager, " Individual fit testing of hearing protector devices.," in First European Forum on Effective Solutions for Managing Occupational Noise, Noise at Work 2007, Lille, France (2007).
53. General dynamics advanced information engineering services, real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT), Test Report for Sonomax Hearing Healthcare Inc. (2004).
54. C. M. Jarque and A. K. Bera, " A test for normality of observations and regression residuals.," Int. Statist. Rev. 0306-7734 55, 1-10 (1987). 10.2307/1403192
55. J. Voix, F. Laville, and J. Zeidan, " In-situ personal assessment of hearing protector performance-recommendations for an updated standard.," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 0001-4966 117, 2480 (2005).