메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 713-755

A review of the year in family law 2007-2008: Federalization and nationalization continue

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 67549105260     PISSN: 0014729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (6)

References (382)
  • 1
    • 67549096658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kennedy v. DuPont Savings and Investment Plan, 2009 WL 160440 (U. S. 2009).
    • Kennedy v. DuPont Savings and Investment Plan, 2009 WL 160440 (U. S. 2009).
  • 2
    • 67549150687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pub. L. 110-351
    • Pub. L. 110-351.
  • 3
    • 67549088043 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Boler, Bankr. L. Rep. P 81, 096 (M. D. Ala. 2008).
    • In re Boler, Bankr. L. Rep. P 81, 096 (M. D. Ala. 2008).
  • 4
    • 67549112177 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Carter-Bland, 382 B. R. 743 (Bkrtcy. S. D. Ohio 2008).
    • In re Carter-Bland, 382 B. R. 743 (Bkrtcy. S. D. Ohio 2008).
  • 5
    • 67549096657 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trustees of Operating Engineers Local #965 Health Benefit Plan v. Westfall, 34 Fam. L. Rep. 1032 (Bank. CD. Ill. 2007).
    • Trustees of Operating Engineers Local #965 Health Benefit Plan v. Westfall, 34 Fam. L. Rep. 1032 (Bank. CD. Ill. 2007).
  • 6
    • 67549099352 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fed. Reg. 37997 (2008).
    • Fed. Reg. 37997 (2008).
  • 7
    • 67549129073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Proctor v. Comm'r, T. C. 2813-06, 129 T. C. 12 (2007).
    • Proctor v. Comm'r, T. C. 2813-06, 129 T. C. 12 (2007).
  • 8
    • 67549132241 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Perkins v. Comm'r, T. C. M. 2008-41, 6521-06 (2008).
    • Perkins v. Comm'r, T. C. M. 2008-41, 6521-06 (2008).
  • 9
    • 67549134460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nihiser v. Comm'r, 19315-04, T. C. M. 2008-135 (2008).
    • Nihiser v. Comm'r, 19315-04, T. C. M. 2008-135 (2008).
  • 11
    • 67549093208 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of C. D., 751 N. W.2d 236 (N. D. 2008) (finding a child's eligibility for membership in federally recognized tribe does not mean that he or she is an Indian child. The child's parent must also be a current tribal member).
    • In re Adoption of C. D., 751 N. W.2d 236 (N. D. 2008) (finding a child's eligibility for membership in federally recognized tribe does not mean that he or she is an "Indian" child. The child's parent must also be a current tribal member).
  • 13
    • 67549146634 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cherino v. Cherino, 176 P.3d 1184 (N. M. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Cherino v. Cherino, 176 P.3d 1184 (N. M. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 14
    • 67549135744 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Langdeau v. Langdeau, 751 N. W.2d 722 (S. D. 2008).
    • Langdeau v. Langdeau, 751 N. W.2d 722 (S. D. 2008).
  • 15
    • 67549144062 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See In re Alice M., 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 863 (Ct. App. 2008) ; In re T. A., 883 N. E.2d 639 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
    • See In re Alice M., 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 863 (Ct. App. 2008) ; In re T. A., 883 N. E.2d 639 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
  • 16
    • 67549098334 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Cheyanne F., 79 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189 (Ct. App. 2008) (reviewing errors and omissions in ICWA notice under harmless error standard). See also In re M. B., 176 P.3d 977 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008) (even though failure to comply with ICWA, evidence was sufficient to terminate father's parental rights).
    • In re Cheyanne F., 79 Cal. Rptr. 3d 189 (Ct. App. 2008) (reviewing errors and omissions in ICWA notice under harmless error standard). See also In re M. B., 176 P.3d 977 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008) (even though failure to comply with ICWA, evidence was sufficient to terminate father's parental rights).
  • 17
    • 67549113891 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re J. S., 177 P.3d 590 (Okla. Civ. App. 2008). See also In re Interest of Walter W., 744 N. W. 2d 55 (Neb. 2008) ; In re A. A., 176 P.3d 237 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008) (rejecting an ICWA-based constitutional equal-protection challenge to parental-rights-termination law).
    • In re J. S., 177 P.3d 590 (Okla. Civ. App. 2008). See also In re Interest of Walter W., 744 N. W. 2d 55 (Neb. 2008) ; In re A. A., 176 P.3d 237 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008) (rejecting an ICWA-based constitutional equal-protection challenge to parental-rights-termination law).
  • 18
    • 67549089765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re N. N. E., 752 N. E.2d 1 (Iowa 2008).
    • In re N. N. E., 752 N. E.2d 1 (Iowa 2008).
  • 19
    • 67549127327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Steven H. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 190 P.3d 180 (Ariz. 2008).
    • Steven H. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 190 P.3d 180 (Ariz. 2008).
  • 20
    • 67549146635 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Viteri v. Pflucker, 550 F. Supp. 2d 829 (N. D. Ill. 2008).
    • Viteri v. Pflucker, 550 F. Supp. 2d 829 (N. D. Ill. 2008).
  • 22
    • 67549144897 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir. 2007). See also Van de Sande v. Van de Sande, 2008 WL 239150 (N. D. Ill. Jan. 29, 2008) (unpublished) (finding that the children's habitual residence did not shift from the United States to Belgium, even though they lived there for three years, because the father had promised the family would move back to the United States after he finished his schooling) ; In re Mikovic v. Mikovic, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (M. D. Fla. 2007) (finding no shared intent to move to Wales when father was deported for overstaying work visa; court should look at how the child's presence in the foreign country fits within the larger picture of the history of this couple and the child).
    • Robert v. Tesson, 507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir. 2007). See also Van de Sande v. Van de Sande, 2008 WL 239150 (N. D. Ill. Jan. 29, 2008) (unpublished) (finding that the children's habitual residence did not shift from the United States to Belgium, even though they lived there for three years, because the father had promised the family would move back to the United States after he finished his schooling) ; In re Mikovic v. Mikovic, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (M. D. Fla. 2007) (finding no shared intent to move to Wales when father was deported for overstaying work visa; court should look at how the child's presence in the foreign country fits within the larger picture of the history of this couple and the child).
  • 23
    • 67549137534 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sorenson v. Sorenson, 563 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Minn. 2008).
    • Sorenson v. Sorenson, 563 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Minn. 2008).
  • 24
    • 67549109351 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clarke v. Clarke, 2008 WL 2217608 (E. D. Pa. May 27, 2008) (unpublished) (children ordered returned to Australia).
    • Clarke v. Clarke, 2008 WL 2217608 (E. D. Pa. May 27, 2008) (unpublished) (children ordered returned to Australia).
  • 25
    • 67549124919 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re B. del C. S. B., 525 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (CD. Cal. 2007).
    • In re B. del C. S. B., 525 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (CD. Cal. 2007).
  • 26
    • 67549127328 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • McClary v. McClary, 2007 WL 3023563 (M. D. Tenn. Oct. 12, 2007) (unpublished).
    • McClary v. McClary, 2007 WL 3023563 (M. D. Tenn. Oct. 12, 2007) (unpublished).
  • 27
    • 67549098333 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Witherspoon, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 586 (Ct. App. 2008) (when children had been removed by civil authorities from their mother in Germany, court erred in awarding her temporary custody pending children's return to Germany).
    • In re Marriage of Witherspoon, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 586 (Ct. App. 2008) (when children had been removed by civil authorities from their mother in Germany, court erred in awarding her temporary custody pending children's return to Germany).
  • 28
    • 67549102185 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lieberman v. Tabachnik, 2008 WL 1744353 (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2008) (unpublished).
    • Lieberman v. Tabachnik, 2008 WL 1744353 (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2008) (unpublished).
  • 30
    • 67549116996 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Altamiranda Vale v. Avila, 538 F.3d 518 (7th Cir. 2008) (noting mother failed to show how the bizarre anti-American ruminations of the President of Venezuela are relevant).
    • Altamiranda Vale v. Avila, 538 F.3d 518 (7th Cir. 2008) (noting mother failed to show how the "bizarre anti-American ruminations of the President of Venezuela are relevant").
  • 31
    • 67549102184 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Leites v. Mendiburu, 2008 WL 114954 (M. D. Ha. Jan. 9, 2008) (unpublished).
    • Leites v. Mendiburu, 2008 WL 114954 (M. D. Ha. Jan. 9, 2008) (unpublished).
  • 33
    • 67549115083 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Simcox v. Simcox, 2008 WL 2924094 (N. D. Ohio July 24, 2008). See also De Giuseppe v. De Giuseppe, 2008 WL 1743079 (E. D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2008) (unpublished) (denying return to Canada because the court was certain the mother would abuse her children before a court in Canada could address the issue). For a case finding undertakings to be sufficient to alleviate concerns, see Kufner v. Kufner, 519 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2008).
    • Simcox v. Simcox, 2008 WL 2924094 (N. D. Ohio July 24, 2008). See also De Giuseppe v. De Giuseppe, 2008 WL 1743079 (E. D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2008) (unpublished) (denying return to Canada because the court was certain the mother would abuse her children before a court in Canada could address the issue). For a case finding undertakings to be sufficient to alleviate concerns, see Kufner v. Kufner, 519 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 2008).
  • 35
    • 67549098331 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re A. V. P. G., 251 S. W.3d 117 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re A. V. P. G., 251 S. W.3d 117 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 36
    • 67549109350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Muhlenkamp v. Blizzard, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1140 (E. D. Wash. 2007) (finding that child was two to three levels above grade and well-liked by peers at day care and had strong support group; the German order was not entitled to full faith and credit because the mother was not notified of the proceeding).
    • Muhlenkamp v. Blizzard, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1140 (E. D. Wash. 2007) (finding that child was two to three levels above grade and well-liked by peers at day care and had strong support group; the German order was not entitled to full faith and credit because the mother was not notified of the proceeding).
  • 38
    • 67549087976 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lopez v. Alcala, 547 F. Supp. 2d 1255 (M. D. Fla. 2008).
    • Lopez v. Alcala, 547 F. Supp. 2d 1255 (M. D. Fla. 2008).
  • 39
    • 67549102183 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Diallo v. Bekemeyer, 2007 WL 4593502 (E. D. Mo. Dec. 28, 2007) (unpublished).
    • Diallo v. Bekemeyer, 2007 WL 4593502 (E. D. Mo. Dec. 28, 2007) (unpublished).
  • 41
    • 67549137529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maxwell v. Maxwell, 2008 WL 4129509 (W. D. N. C. Sept. 2, 2008).
    • Maxwell v. Maxwell, 2008 WL 4129509 (W. D. N. C. Sept. 2, 2008).
  • 43
    • 67549094835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re J. J. L. P., 256 S. W.3d 363 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re J. J. L. P., 256 S. W.3d 363 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 44
    • 67549150638 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • McCann v. Doe, 660 S. E.2d 500 (S. C. 2008).
    • McCann v. Doe, 660 S. E.2d 500 (S. C. 2008).
  • 45
    • 67549112174 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of N. J. G., 891 N. E.2d 60 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Adoption of N. J. G., 891 N. E.2d 60 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 46
    • 67549146557 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Helen G. V. Mark J. H., 175 P.3d 914 (N. M. 2007) (allowing adoption over biological father's objection).
    • Helen G. V. Mark J. H., 175 P.3d 914 (N. M. 2007) (allowing adoption over biological father's objection).
  • 47
    • 67549144818 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Pedro Jason William M., 847 N. Y. S.2d 17 (App. Div. 2007).
    • In re Pedro Jason William M., 847 N. Y. S.2d 17 (App. Div. 2007).
  • 48
    • 67549102102 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of K. C. J., 184 P.3d 1239 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Adoption of K. C. J., 184 P.3d 1239 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
  • 49
    • 67549093129 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Vanessa Ann G. L., 856 N. Y. S. 2d 657 (App. Div. 2008).
    • In re Vanessa Ann G. L., 856 N. Y. S. 2d 657 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 50
    • 67549132166 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of G. L. V., 190 P.3d 245 (Kan. 2008). See also In re Adoption of D. D. H., 184 P.3d 987 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Adoption of G. L. V., 190 P.3d 245 (Kan. 2008). See also In re Adoption of D. D. H., 184 P.3d 987 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 51
    • 67549101085 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of M. A., 930 A.2d 1088 (Me. 2007).
    • In re Adoption of M. A., 930 A.2d 1088 (Me. 2007).
  • 52
    • 67549113890 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Finstuen v. Crutcher, 496 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2007). See also Schott v. Schott, 744 N. W.2d 85 (Iowa 2008) (finding trial court erred in sua sponte setting aside the adoption of same-sex partner's children born during the couple's relationship since they were final and not subject to collateral attack).
    • Finstuen v. Crutcher, 496 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2007). See also Schott v. Schott, 744 N. W.2d 85 (Iowa 2008) (finding trial court erred in sua sponte setting aside the adoption of same-sex partner's children born during the couple's relationship since they were final and not subject to collateral attack).
  • 53
    • 67549130359 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of L. M. R., 884 N. E.2d 931 (Ind. App. 2008). See also Antonio P. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 187 P.3d 1115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008) (placing child with aunt and uncle with whom child had extended relationship over grandparents).
    • In re Adoption of L. M. R., 884 N. E.2d 931 (Ind. App. 2008). See also Antonio P. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 187 P.3d 1115 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008) (placing child with aunt and uncle with whom child had extended relationship over grandparents).
  • 54
    • 67549089687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • G. S. v. T. B., 985 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 2008).
    • G. S. v. T. B., 985 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 2008).
  • 55
    • 67549093128 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Web, 980 So. 2d 123 (La. Ct. App. 2008) (noting adoption would be appropriate if there were no natural parent, the natural parent was indifferent to child's well-being or visits sporadic). See also C. R. H. v. B. F., 169 P.3d 1286 (Or. Ct. App. 2007) (denying stepfather's petition to adopt because although father was incarcerated, he had not abandoned children).
    • In re Web, 980 So. 2d 123 (La. Ct. App. 2008) (noting adoption would be appropriate if there were no natural parent, the natural parent was indifferent to child's well-being or visits sporadic). See also C. R. H. v. B. F., 169 P.3d 1286 (Or. Ct. App. 2007) (denying stepfather's petition to adopt because although father was incarcerated, he had not abandoned children).
  • 56
    • 67549130361 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Accounting by Fleet Bank, 884 N. E.2d 1040 (N. Y. 2008).
    • In re Accounting by Fleet Bank, 884 N. E.2d 1040 (N. Y. 2008).
  • 57
    • 67549143981 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of D. C., 887 N. E.2d 950 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Adoption of D. C., 887 N. E.2d 950 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 58
    • 67549098266 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Adoption of R. S., 231 S. W.3d 826 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Adoption of R. S., 231 S. W.3d 826 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 59
    • 67549105065 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Edwards v. Edwards, 744 N. W.2d 243 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008) (upholding agreement where a wife had partial legal representation, had time to consider the agreement, and was not coerced).
    • Edwards v. Edwards, 744 N. W.2d 243 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008) (upholding agreement where a wife had partial legal representation, had time to consider the agreement, and was not coerced).
  • 60
    • 67549087977 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Francavilla v. Francavilla, 969 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Francavilla v. Francavilla, 969 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 61
    • 67549096575 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Blige v. Blige, 656 S. E.2d 822 (Ga. 2008).
    • Blige v. Blige, 656 S. E.2d 822 (Ga. 2008).
  • 62
    • 67549099263 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Estate of Martin, 938 A.2d 812 (Me. 2008) (noting that the fact a spouse did not perform all of his contractual obligations to change beneficiary of an insurance policy prior to death does not require that the agreement be set aside).
    • In re Estate of Martin, 938 A.2d 812 (Me. 2008) (noting that the fact a spouse did not perform all of his contractual obligations to change beneficiary of an insurance policy prior to death does not require that the agreement be set aside).
  • 63
    • 67549150639 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Williams v. Williams, 246 S. W.3d 207 (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Williams v. Williams, 246 S. W.3d 207 (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 64
    • 67549113833 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Rosenbaum-Golden v. Golden, 884 N. E.2d 1272 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
    • In re Marriage of Rosenbaum-Golden v. Golden, 884 N. E.2d 1272 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
  • 65
    • 67549150636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Eyster v. Pechenik, 887 N. E.2d 272 (Mass. App. Ct. 2008). See also McIntyre v. McIntyre, 654 S. E.2d 798 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008) (finding a prenuptial agreement which provided that the parties could buy and sell property without the other's consent is not to be interpreted as a waiver of equitable distribution of property upon divorce).
    • Eyster v. Pechenik, 887 N. E.2d 272 (Mass. App. Ct. 2008). See also McIntyre v. McIntyre, 654 S. E.2d 798 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008) (finding a prenuptial agreement which provided that the parties could buy and sell property without the other's consent is not to be interpreted as a waiver of equitable distribution of property upon divorce).
  • 66
    • 67549142271 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Homra v. Nelson, 2008 WL 684542 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2008).
    • Homra v. Nelson, 2008 WL 684542 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2008).
  • 67
    • 67549137445 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ahmed v. Ahmed, 261 S. W.3d 190 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008). See also Zawahiri v. Alwattar, 2008 WL 2698679 (Ohio Ct. App. Jul. 10, 2008) (unpublished) (finding that presenting a mahr on the day of the wedding made it unenforceable).
    • Ahmed v. Ahmed, 261 S. W.3d 190 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008). See also Zawahiri v. Alwattar, 2008 WL 2698679 (Ohio Ct. App. Jul. 10, 2008) (unpublished) (finding that presenting a mahr on the day of the wedding made it unenforceable).
  • 68
    • 67549106825 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stawski v., 843 N. Y. S.2d 544 (App. Div. 2007).
    • Stawski v., 843 N. Y. S.2d 544 (App. Div. 2007).
  • 69
    • 67549096576 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Tabassum and Younis, 881 N. E.2d 396 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
    • In re Marriage of Tabassum and Younis, 881 N. E.2d 396 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
  • 70
    • 67549134395 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bruker v. Marcovitz, [2007] S. C. R. 54 (Can.).
    • Bruker v. Marcovitz, [2007] S. C. R. 54 (Can.).
  • 71
    • 67549115014 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Takusagawa, 166 P.3d 440 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Marriage of Takusagawa, 166 P.3d 440 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 72
    • 67549124848 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Elwell v. Elwell, 947 A.2d 1136 (D. C. 2008).
    • Elwell v. Elwell, 947 A.2d 1136 (D. C. 2008).
  • 73
    • 67549113835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • LoCasto v. LoCasto, 518 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (N. D. Ill. 2007).
    • LoCasto v. LoCasto, 518 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (N. D. Ill. 2007).
  • 74
    • 67549130362 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • P. B. v. L. B., 855 N. Y. S.2d 836 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
    • P. B. v. L. B., 855 N. Y. S.2d 836 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
  • 75
    • 67549109281 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Loscher v. Hudson, 182 P.3d 25 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Loscher v. Hudson, 182 P.3d 25 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 76
    • 67549120973 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Green, 169 P.3d 202 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Marriage of Green, 169 P.3d 202 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 77
    • 67549132168 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pizzo v. Goor, 857 N. Y. S.2d 526 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Pizzo v. Goor, 857 N. Y. S.2d 526 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 78
    • 67549135666 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ashby v. Ashby, 191 P.3d 35 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
    • Ashby v. Ashby, 191 P.3d 35 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
  • 79
    • 67549086295 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Devaney v. L'Esperance, 949 A.2d 743 (N. J. 2008).
    • Devaney v. L'Esperance, 949 A.2d 743 (N. J. 2008).
  • 80
    • 67549084645 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Connell v. Diehl, 938 A.2d 143 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
    • Connell v. Diehl, 938 A.2d 143 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
  • 81
    • 67549119367 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Estate of Quarg, 938 A.2d 193 (N. J. Super. App. Div. 2008).
    • In re Estate of Quarg, 938 A.2d 193 (N. J. Super. App. Div. 2008).
  • 82
    • 67549105066 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Radcliffe v. Radcliffe, 951 A.2d 575 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). But see Spivey v. Topper, 876 N. E.2d 781 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (finding trial court erred in awarding the incapacitated wife alimony for only six months when there was no evidence that she could be employed after that time).
    • Radcliffe v. Radcliffe, 951 A.2d 575 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). But see Spivey v. Topper, 876 N. E.2d 781 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (finding trial court erred in awarding the incapacitated wife alimony for only six months when there was no evidence that she could be employed after that time).
  • 83
    • 67549099351 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Wold v. Wold, 744 N. W.2d 541 (N. D. 2008) ; Lawson v. Lawson, 940 A.2d 444 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
    • Wold v. Wold, 744 N. W.2d 541 (N. D. 2008) ; Lawson v. Lawson, 940 A.2d 444 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
  • 84
    • 67549140078 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Bratcher, 890 N. E.2d 1232 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
    • In re Marriage of Bratcher, 890 N. E.2d 1232 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
  • 85
    • 67549134458 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Brown v. Brown, 665 S. E.2d 174 (S. C. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Brown v. Brown, 665 S. E.2d 174 (S. C. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 86
    • 67549112108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ulliman v. Ulliman, 2008 WL 2942213 (Ohio Ct. App. Aug. 1, 2008).
    • Ulliman v. Ulliman, 2008 WL 2942213 (Ohio Ct. App. Aug. 1, 2008).
  • 87
    • 67549096655 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Kenick, 934
    • In re Kenick, 934 A.2d 573 (N. H. 2007).
    • (2007) A.2d , vol.573 , Issue.H
  • 88
    • 67549120976 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Waldren v. Waldren, 171 P.3d 1214 (Ariz. 2007). See also In re Holscher, 180 P.3d 199 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008) (parties can agree that alimony will not be modified).
    • Waldren v. Waldren, 171 P.3d 1214 (Ariz. 2007). See also In re Holscher, 180 P.3d 199 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008) (parties can agree that alimony will not be modified).
  • 89
    • 67549094842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Eckert v. Eckert, 941 A.2d 301 (Conn. 2008).
    • Eckert v. Eckert, 941 A.2d 301 (Conn. 2008).
  • 90
    • 67549098268 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Grachek v. Grachek. 750 N. W.2d 328 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Grachek v. Grachek. 750 N. W.2d 328 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 91
    • 67549130364 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jensen v. Jensen, 173 P.3d 223 (Utah Ct. App. 2007).
    • Jensen v. Jensen, 173 P.3d 223 (Utah Ct. App. 2007).
  • 92
    • 67549118628 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Nassar, 843
    • In re Nassar, 843 A.2d 740 (N. H. 2008).
    • (2008) A.2d , vol.740 , Issue.H
  • 93
    • 67549144822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Palmer v. Palmer, 170 P.3d 676 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007) ; Cortese v. Cortese, 176 P.3d 1064 (Mont. 2008).
    • Palmer v. Palmer, 170 P.3d 676 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007) ; Cortese v. Cortese, 176 P.3d 1064 (Mont. 2008).
  • 94
    • 67549094840 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Janes v. Janes, 242 S. W.3d 744 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Janes v. Janes, 242 S. W.3d 744 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 95
    • 67549119276 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Graev v. Graev, 848 N. Y. S.2d 627 (App. Div. 2007).
    • Graev v. Graev, 848 N. Y. S.2d 627 (App. Div. 2007).
  • 96
    • 54049100020 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See American Bar Association Model Act Governing Assisted Reproductive Technology, 42 Fam. L. Q. 171 (2008).
    • See American Bar Association Model Act Governing Assisted Reproductive Technology, 42 Fam. L. Q. 171 (2008).
  • 97
    • 67549105070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ferguson v. McKiernan, 940 A.2d 1236 (Pa. 2007).
    • Ferguson v. McKiernan, 940 A.2d 1236 (Pa. 2007).
  • 98
    • 67549132702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re K. M. H., 169 P.3d 1025 (Kan. 2007).
    • In re K. M. H., 169 P.3d 1025 (Kan. 2007).
  • 99
    • 67549148579 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ewing v. Ewing, 2007 WL 4563458 (Ohio App. Dec. 20, 2007).
    • Ewing v. Ewing, 2007 WL 4563458 (Ohio App. Dec. 20, 2007).
  • 100
    • 67549115016 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Finley v. Astrue, 270 S. W.3d 849 (Ark. 2007).
    • Finley v. Astrue, 270 S. W.3d 849 (Ark. 2007).
  • 101
    • 67549140081 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • J. F. v. D. B., 879 N. E. 2d 740 (Ohio 2007).
    • J. F. v. D. B., 879 N. E. 2d 740 (Ohio 2007).
  • 102
    • 67549113840 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maxwell, Schuman and Co. v. Edwards, 663 S. E.2d 329 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Maxwell, Schuman and Co. v. Edwards, 663 S. E.2d 329 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 103
    • 67549112109 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sheresky, Aronson and Mayefesky v. Whitmore, 34 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1031 (N. Y. Sup. Ct. 2007).
    • Sheresky, Aronson and Mayefesky v. Whitmore, 34 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1031 (N. Y. Sup. Ct. 2007).
  • 104
    • 67549113841 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chames v. DeMayo, 972 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2008).
    • Chames v. DeMayo, 972 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2008).
  • 105
    • 67549103873 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Iriarte v. Iriarte, 856 N. Y. S.2d 839 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
    • Iriarte v. Iriarte, 856 N. Y. S.2d 839 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
  • 106
    • 67549137455 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Iannuzzelli v. Lovett. 981 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Iannuzzelli v. Lovett. 981 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 107
    • 67549101000 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ABA Standing Comm. on Ethics and Prof'l Responsibility, Formal Op. 07-447, 33 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1538 (2007).
    • ABA Standing Comm. on Ethics and Prof'l Responsibility, Formal Op. 07-447, 33 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1538 (2007).
  • 108
    • 67549109348 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Hoffmeyer, 656 S. E.2d 376 (S. C. 2008).
    • In re Hoffmeyer, 656 S. E.2d 376 (S. C. 2008).
  • 109
    • 67549121041 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Butler v. Romanova, 953 A.2d 748 (Me. 2008).
    • Butler v. Romanova, 953 A.2d 748 (Me. 2008).
  • 110
    • 67549094903 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Florida Bar Prof'l Ethics Comm., Op. 07-1, 34 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1058 (2007).
    • Florida Bar Prof'l Ethics Comm., Op. 07-1, 34 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1058 (2007).
  • 111
    • 67549102182 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Johnson, 877 N. E.2d 249 (Mass. 2007).
    • In re Johnson, 877 N. E.2d 249 (Mass. 2007).
  • 112
    • 67549086373 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Heinze v. Bauer, 178 P.3d 597 (Idaho 2008).
    • Heinze v. Bauer, 178 P.3d 597 (Idaho 2008).
  • 114
    • 84868980625 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hageman v. Sw. Gen. Health CtrŽ 893 N. E.2d 153 (Ohio 2008).
    • Hageman v. Sw. Gen. Health CtrŽ 893 N. E.2d 153 (Ohio 2008).
  • 115
    • 67549129068 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Texas Dep't of Fam. and Protective Servs
    • 255 S, Tex
    • In re Texas Dep't of Fam. and Protective Servs., 255 S. W.3d 613 (Tex. 2008).
    • (2008) W.3d 613
  • 117
    • 67549086369 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re C. A. O., 192 P.3d 508 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re C. A. O., 192 P.3d 508 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 118
    • 67549150683 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re A. T, 744 N. W.2d 657 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re A. T, 744 N. W.2d 657 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
  • 119
    • 67549101084 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Timothy T. v. Shireen T., 741 N. W.2d 452 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Timothy T. v. Shireen T., 741 N. W.2d 452 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 120
    • 67549114544 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • D. O. v. S. M., 981 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007) reh'g denied.
    • D. O. v. S. M., 981 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007) reh'g denied.
  • 121
    • 67549096654 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re A. P., 752 N. W.2d 34 (Iowa App. 2008) ; In re Walter W., 744 N. W.2d 55 (Neb. 2008) (mother suffered from depression, had intermittent explosive disorder and narcissistic traits, and would not be able to provide permanency).
    • In re A. P., 752 N. W.2d 34 (Iowa App. 2008) ; In re Walter W., 744 N. W.2d 55 (Neb. 2008) (mother suffered from depression, had intermittent explosive disorder and narcissistic traits, and would not be able to provide permanency).
  • 123
    • 67549116993 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re B. and J., 756 N. W.2d 234 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re B. and J., 756 N. W.2d 234 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 124
    • 67549129069 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re K. R. G., 248 S. W.3d 651 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re K. R. G., 248 S. W.3d 651 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 125
    • 67549128998 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re E. F. B. D., 245 S. W.3d 316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re E. F. B. D., 245 S. W.3d 316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 126
    • 67549091446 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rosen v. Celebrezze, 883 N. E.2d 420 (Ohio 2008).
    • Rosen v. Celebrezze, 883 N. E.2d 420 (Ohio 2008).
  • 127
    • 67549134392 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rosen v. Rosen, 664 S. E.2d 743 (W. Va. 2008). See also Landeau v. Landeau, 751 N. W.2d 722 (S. D. 2008) (South Dakota has no jurisdiction to decide custody when the child's home state is the Native-American reservation where she had lived for six months prior to the commencement of the divorce; however, the state trial court did have jurisdiction to grant the divorce) ; Stewart v. Vulliet, 888 N. E.2d 761 (Ind. 2008) (Indiana does not have jurisdiction to decide custody when, after the case was filed in Indiana, the child was born in Washington and continued to reside there).
    • Rosen v. Rosen, 664 S. E.2d 743 (W. Va. 2008). See also Landeau v. Landeau, 751 N. W.2d 722 (S. D. 2008) (South Dakota has no jurisdiction to decide custody when the child's home state is the Native-American reservation where she had lived for six months prior to the commencement of the divorce; however, the state trial court did have jurisdiction to grant the divorce) ; Stewart v. Vulliet, 888 N. E.2d 761 (Ind. 2008) (Indiana does not have jurisdiction to decide custody when, after the case was filed in Indiana, the child was born in Washington and continued to reside there).
  • 128
    • 67549101001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Michael McC. v. Manuela A., 848 N. Y. S.2d 147 (App. Div. 2007).
    • Michael McC. v. Manuela A., 848 N. Y. S.2d 147 (App. Div. 2007).
  • 129
    • 67549105073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stewart v. Vulliett, 888 N. E.2d 761 (Ind. 2008).
    • Stewart v. Vulliett, 888 N. E.2d 761 (Ind. 2008).
  • 130
    • 67549102107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Malissa C. v. Matthew Wayne H., 193 P.3d 569 (N. M. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Malissa C. v. Matthew Wayne H., 193 P.3d 569 (N. M. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 131
    • 67549127324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Garcia v. Gutierrez, 192 P.3d. 275 (N. M. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Garcia v. Gutierrez, 192 P.3d. 275 (N. M. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 132
    • 67549135741 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Greely, 943
    • Greely v. Greely, 943 A.2d 841 (N. J. 2008).
    • (2008) A.2d , vol.841 , Issue.J
    • Greely, V.1
  • 133
    • 67549102108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hart v. Kozik, 242 S. W.3d. 102 (Tex. App. 2007).
    • Hart v. Kozik, 242 S. W.3d. 102 (Tex. App. 2007).
  • 134
    • 67549132703 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State ex rel. J. W., 975 So. 2d 841 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
    • State ex rel. J. W., 975 So. 2d 841 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 135
    • 67549106914 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lighty v. Lighty, 879 N. E.2d 637 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Lighty v. Lighty, 879 N. E.2d 637 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 136
    • 67549143983 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Schultz v. Schultz, 187 P.3d 1234 (Idaho 2008).
    • Schultz v. Schultz, 187 P.3d 1234 (Idaho 2008).
  • 137
    • 67549099268 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Adoption of Yvette, 881 N. E.2d 1159 (Mass. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Adoption of Yvette, 881 N. E.2d 1159 (Mass. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 138
    • 67549137444 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See Prickett v. Prickett, 167 P.3d 661 (Wyo. 2007) (finding that court did not need to enforce the consented to modification of visitation by a Nebraska court) ; Kelso v. Decker, 262 S. W.3d 307 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008) (finding that because father still lived in Ohio, it retained continuing jurisdiction, not the new home state) ; White v. Harrison-White, 760 N. W.2d 691 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008) (even though mother and child moved to Canada, father remained in the state and child retains a significant connection).
    • See Prickett v. Prickett, 167 P.3d 661 (Wyo. 2007) (finding that court did not need to enforce the consented to modification of visitation by a Nebraska court) ; Kelso v. Decker, 262 S. W.3d 307 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008) (finding that because father still lived in Ohio, it retained continuing jurisdiction, not the new home state) ; White v. Harrison-White, 760 N. W.2d 691 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008) (even though mother and child moved to Canada, father remained in the state and child retains a significant connection).
  • 139
    • 67549137525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Billhime v. Billhime, 952 A.2d 1174 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
    • Billhime v. Billhime, 952 A.2d 1174 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
  • 140
    • 67549132232 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Z. T. S., 2008 WL 371184 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2008) (unpublished). See also In re B. P., 184 P.3d 334 (Mont. 2008) (finding that Montana lost jurisdiction when the children were with their father in California and the mother was in Minnesota).
    • In re Z. T. S., 2008 WL 371184 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 12, 2008) (unpublished). See also In re B. P., 184 P.3d 334 (Mont. 2008) (finding that Montana lost jurisdiction when the children were with their father in California and the mother was in Minnesota).
  • 141
    • 67549084643 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re J. H., 2008 WL 3867850 (Tex. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2008) (unpublished).
    • In re J. H., 2008 WL 3867850 (Tex. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2008) (unpublished).
  • 142
    • 67549115082 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Miller v. Miller, 2008 WL 3877145 (Vt. Aug. 22, 2008).
    • Miller v. Miller, 2008 WL 3877145 (Vt. Aug. 22, 2008).
  • 143
    • 67549134457 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Sophia G. L., 890 N. E.2d 470 (Ill. 2008).
    • In re Sophia G. L., 890 N. E.2d 470 (Ill. 2008).
  • 144
    • 67549150643 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re S. K. B., 2008 WL 2553388 (Tex. Ct. App. June 26, 2008) (unpublished).
    • In re S. K. B., 2008 WL 2553388 (Tex. Ct. App. June 26, 2008) (unpublished).
  • 145
    • 67549148576 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A. K. v. N. B., 2008 WL 2154098 (Ala. Civ. App. May 23, 2008).
    • A. K. v. N. B., 2008 WL 2154098 (Ala. Civ. App. May 23, 2008).
  • 146
    • 84890082000 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should Courts Make Child-rearing Decisions? Married Parents as a Paradigm for Parents Who Live Apart, 43
    • See
    • See Robert E. Emery and Kimberly C. Emery, Should Courts Make Child-rearing Decisions? Married Parents as a Paradigm for Parents Who Live Apart, 43 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 365 (2008).
    • (2008) WAKE FOREST L. REV , vol.365
    • Emery, R.E.1    Emery, K.C.2
  • 147
    • 84868987645 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See FLA. STAT. § 61.13 (Oct. 2008).
    • See FLA. STAT. § 61.13 (Oct. 2008).
  • 148
    • 67549127323 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See Snowden v. Snowden, 985 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008) (finding that a trial court was not required to enforce a couple's agreement that custody of their children would shift to the father from the mother if she drank in their presence) ; Eickbush v. Eickbush, 171 P.3d 509 (Wyo. 2007) (noting that trial court had to weigh the best interests of the child against enforcing the parents' agreement).
    • See Snowden v. Snowden, 985 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008) (finding that a trial court was not required to enforce a couple's agreement that custody of their children would shift to the father from the mother if she drank in their presence) ; Eickbush v. Eickbush, 171 P.3d 509 (Wyo. 2007) (noting that trial court had to weigh the best interests of the child against enforcing the parents' agreement).
  • 149
    • 67549089760 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fawzy v. Fawzy, 948 A.2d 709 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
    • Fawzy v. Fawzy, 948 A.2d 709 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
  • 150
    • 67549132786 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Weeks v. Weeks, 989 So. 2d 408 (Miss. App. 2008).
    • Weeks v. Weeks, 989 So. 2d 408 (Miss. App. 2008).
  • 151
    • 67549102180 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Volodarsky v. Tarachanskaya, 916 A.2d 991 (Md. 2007) ; Puddicombe v. Dreka, 167 P.3d 73 (Alaska 2007) ; Wessman v. Wessman, 747 N. W.2d 85 (N. D. 2008).
    • Volodarsky v. Tarachanskaya, 916 A.2d 991 (Md. 2007) ; Puddicombe v. Dreka, 167 P.3d 73 (Alaska 2007) ; Wessman v. Wessman, 747 N. W.2d 85 (N. D. 2008).
  • 152
    • 67549114476 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Alexander v. Alexander, 985 So. 2d 490 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007) (noting that even though the father had better lodging (house v. trailer), there was no abuse of discretion in awarding mother residential custody) ; Sumrall v. Sumrall, 970 So. 2d 254 (Miss. App. 2007) (noting mother was more stable, had been primary custodian, had a job, and child had close relationship with half sibling).
    • Alexander v. Alexander, 985 So. 2d 490 (Ala. Civ. App. 2007) (noting that even though the father had better lodging (house v. trailer), there was no abuse of discretion in awarding mother residential custody) ; Sumrall v. Sumrall, 970 So. 2d 254 (Miss. App. 2007) (noting mother was more stable, had been primary custodian, had a job, and child had close relationship with half sibling).
  • 153
    • 67549132231 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A. O. V. v. J. R. V., 2007 WL 581871 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2007) (restrictions limited children's exposure to father's homosexual lifestyle).
    • A. O. V. v. J. R. V., 2007 WL 581871 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2007) (restrictions limited children's exposure to father's homosexual lifestyle).
  • 154
    • 67549132172 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Magnuson, 170 P.3d 65 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Marriage of Magnuson, 170 P.3d 65 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 155
    • 67549089692 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Melikishvili v. Grigolava, 857 N. Y. S. 2d 621 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Melikishvili v. Grigolava, 857 N. Y. S. 2d 621 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 156
    • 67549134401 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Georgakilas, 956
    • In re Georgakilas, 956 A.2d 320 (N. H. 2008).
    • (2008) A.2d , vol.320 , Issue.H
  • 157
    • 67549132704 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kelley v. Kelley, 175 P.3d 400 (Okla. 2007).
    • Kelley v. Kelley, 175 P.3d 400 (Okla. 2007).
  • 158
    • 67549106831 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maska v. Maska. 742 N. W.2d 492 (Neb. 2007).
    • Maska v. Maska. 742 N. W.2d 492 (Neb. 2007).
  • 159
    • 67549120982 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Barile v. Barile, 179 P.3d 944 (Alaska 2008). See also Cook v. Cook, 970 So. 2d 960 (La. 2007) (finding a mother's relationship with a same-sex partner constituted a change of circumstances).
    • Barile v. Barile, 179 P.3d 944 (Alaska 2008). See also Cook v. Cook, 970 So. 2d 960 (La. 2007) (finding a mother's relationship with a same-sex partner constituted a change of circumstances).
  • 160
    • 67549146560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • McLane v. Paul, 189 P.3d 1039 (Alaska 2008).
    • McLane v. Paul, 189 P.3d 1039 (Alaska 2008).
  • 161
    • 67549127269 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ex Parte Cleghorn, 993 So. 2d 462 (Ala. 2008).
    • Ex Parte Cleghorn, 993 So. 2d 462 (Ala. 2008).
  • 162
    • 67549109287 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Harrison v. Harrison, 2008 WL 943915 (Ark. App. Apr. 9, 2008).
    • Harrison v. Harrison, 2008 WL 943915 (Ark. App. Apr. 9, 2008).
  • 163
    • 67549088040 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • C. J. M. v. C. L., 987 So. 2d 317 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
    • C. J. M. v. C. L., 987 So. 2d 317 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 164
    • 67549086368 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Richardson v. Richardson, 974 So. 2d 761 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Richardson v. Richardson, 974 So. 2d 761 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 165
    • 67549098330 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Baxendale v. Raich, 878 N. E.2d 1252 (Ind. 2008).
    • Baxendale v. Raich, 878 N. E.2d 1252 (Ind. 2008).
  • 166
    • 67549103875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Arthur v. Arthur, 987 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Arthur v. Arthur, 987 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 167
    • 67549089693 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Thompson v. Thompson, 176 P.3d 722 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008) ; Bowers v. Vanderneulen- Bowers, 750 N. W.2d 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008) (finding radial, not road miles, should be used to measure distance).
    • Thompson v. Thompson, 176 P.3d 722 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008) ; Bowers v. Vanderneulen- Bowers, 750 N. W.2d 597 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008) (finding radial, not road miles, should be used to measure distance).
  • 168
    • 67549134400 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hogrelius v. Martin, 950 A.2d 345 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
    • Hogrelius v. Martin, 950 A.2d 345 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
  • 169
    • 67549144831 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Waliagha v. Kaiser, 989 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Waliagha v. Kaiser, 989 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 170
    • 67549105074 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Saheb v. Khazal, 880 N. E.2d 537 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
    • In re Marriage of Saheb v. Khazal, 880 N. E.2d 537 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
  • 171
    • 67549124854 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Froland, 936
    • State v. Froland, 936 A.2d 947 (N. J. 2007).
    • (2007) A.2d , vol.947 , Issue.J
    • State, V.1
  • 172
    • 67549130371 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State v. Young, 174 P.3d 460 (Mont. 2007).
    • State v. Young, 174 P.3d 460 (Mont. 2007).
  • 173
    • 84868975338 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Khalifa v. Shannon, 945 A.2d 1244 (Md. 2007) (award of $900, 000 against grandmother and $1, 100, 000 in punitives against mother not excessive).
    • Khalifa v. Shannon, 945 A.2d 1244 (Md. 2007) (award of $900, 000 against grandmother and $1, 100, 000 in punitives against mother not excessive).
  • 174
    • 67549118634 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • N. J. Div. of Youth and Fam. Servs. v. T. M., 945 A.2d 39 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
    • N. J. Div. of Youth and Fam. Servs. v. T. M., 945 A.2d 39 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
  • 175
    • 67549142326 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teresa J. v. Tanya H, 857 N. Y. S.2d 844 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Teresa J. v. Tanya H, 857 N. Y. S.2d 844 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 176
    • 67549140082 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Schaffer v. Schaffer, 884 N. E.2d 423 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). See also Hoeing v. Williams, 880 N. E.2d 1217 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (reversing visitation granted to grandmother who objected to mother's decision to raise child as Jehovah's Witness).
    • Schaffer v. Schaffer, 884 N. E.2d 423 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). See also Hoeing v. Williams, 880 N. E.2d 1217 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (reversing visitation granted to grandmother who objected to mother's decision to raise child as Jehovah's Witness).
  • 177
    • 67549098273 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Compare In re Guardianship of Estelle, 875 N. E.2d 515 (Mass. Ct. App. 2007) (unless unfit, father was entitled to custody, not co-guardianship) with Langston v. Langston, 266 S. W.3d 716 (Ark. 2007) (denying parent's petition to terminate grandparents' guardianship).
    • Compare In re Guardianship of Estelle, 875 N. E.2d 515 (Mass. Ct. App. 2007) (unless unfit, father was entitled to custody, not co-guardianship) with Langston v. Langston, 266 S. W.3d 716 (Ark. 2007) (denying parent's petition to terminate grandparents' guardianship).
  • 178
    • 67549089696 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Doe v. Doe, 172 P.3d 1067 (Haw. 2007).
    • Doe v. Doe, 172 P.3d 1067 (Haw. 2007).
  • 179
    • 67549116930 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • J. L. W. v. E. O. J., 992 So. 2d 727 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).
    • J. L. W. v. E. O. J., 992 So. 2d 727 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).
  • 180
    • 67549115020 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Flynn v. Henkel, 880 N. E.2d 166 (Ill. 2007) (holding that paternal grandmother failed to meet her burden of proof in overcoming statutory presumption that mother's decision denying visitation was not harmful to child's interest).
    • Flynn v. Henkel, 880 N. E.2d 166 (Ill. 2007) (holding that paternal grandmother failed to meet her burden of proof in overcoming statutory presumption that mother's decision denying visitation was not harmful to child's interest).
  • 181
    • 67549099350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sheehan v. Flower, 170 P.3d 288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Sheehan v. Flower, 170 P.3d 288 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 182
    • 67549118636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Huss, 888 N. E.2d 1238 (Ind. 2008).
    • In re Marriage of Huss, 888 N. E.2d 1238 (Ind. 2008).
  • 183
    • 67549086299 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Parentage of M. F., 170 P.3d 601 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Parentage of M. F., 170 P.3d 601 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 184
    • 67549119365 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Parentage of J. A. B., 191 P.3d 71 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Parentage of J. A. B., 191 P.3d 71 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 185
    • 67549129067 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mason v. Dwinnell, 660 S. E.2d 58 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Mason v. Dwinnell, 660 S. E.2d 58 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 186
    • 67549118632 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Heatzig v. MacLean, 664 S. E.2d 347 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008). See also Estroff v. Chatterjee, 660 S. E.2d 73 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008) ; In re Senturi, 652 S. E.2d 490 (W. Va. 2008) (while psychological parents may seek custody or visitation, these intervenors did not qualify where they did not reside with the child or interact on daily basis).
    • Heatzig v. MacLean, 664 S. E.2d 347 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008). See also Estroff v. Chatterjee, 660 S. E.2d 73 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008) ; In re Senturi, 652 S. E.2d 490 (W. Va. 2008) (while psychological parents may seek custody or visitation, these intervenors did not qualify where they did not reside with the child or interact on daily basis).
  • 187
    • 67549096583 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Janice M. v. Margaret K., 948 A.2d 73 (Md. 2008) ; see also Jones v. Barlow, 154 P.3d 808 (Utah 2007).
    • Janice M. v. Margaret K., 948 A.2d 73 (Md. 2008) ; see also Jones v. Barlow, 154 P.3d 808 (Utah 2007).
  • 188
    • 67549144896 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stadter v. Siperko, 661 S. E.2d 494 (Va. Ct. App. 2008) (rinding former lesbian cohabitant failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that denial of visitation would harm child, who was born during parties' relationship as a result of mother's artificial insemination).
    • Stadter v. Siperko, 661 S. E.2d 494 (Va. Ct. App. 2008) (rinding former lesbian cohabitant failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that denial of visitation would harm child, who was born during parties' relationship as a result of mother's artificial insemination).
  • 189
    • 67549120984 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pickelsimer v. Mullins, 2008 WL 820947 (Ky. Ct. App. Mar. 28, 2008) (unpublished), rev. granted.
    • Pickelsimer v. Mullins, 2008 WL 820947 (Ky. Ct. App. Mar. 28, 2008) (unpublished), rev. granted.
  • 190
    • 67549146628 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Smith, 262 S. W.3d 463 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Smith, 262 S. W.3d 463 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 191
    • 67549144832 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Frisch v. Henrichs, 736 N. W.2d 85 (Wis. 2008).
    • Frisch v. Henrichs, 736 N. W.2d 85 (Wis. 2008).
  • 192
    • 67549093135 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mintz v. Zoerning, 198 P.3d 861 (N. M. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Mintz v. Zoerning, 198 P.3d 861 (N. M. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 193
    • 67549087983 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jensen v. Jensen, 750 N. W.2d 335 (Neb. 2008).
    • Jensen v. Jensen, 750 N. W.2d 335 (Neb. 2008).
  • 194
    • 67549119284 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Rife, 878 N. E.2d 775 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
    • In re Rife, 878 N. E.2d 775 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
  • 195
    • 67549115081 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Vandervoort, 185 P.3d 289 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). See also Laffin v. Laffin, 2008 WL 3983880 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2008) (nixing an offset agreement).
    • In re Vandervoort, 185 P.3d 289 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). See also Laffin v. Laffin, 2008 WL 3983880 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2008) (nixing an offset agreement).
  • 197
    • 67549140140 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • L. M. v. R. L. R., 888 N. E.2d 934 (Mass. 2008).
    • L. M. v. R. L. R., 888 N. E.2d 934 (Mass. 2008).
  • 198
    • 67549086366 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Campbell v. Davison, 2008 WL 3582689 (Ala. Civ. App. Aug. 15, 2008).
    • Campbell v. Davison, 2008 WL 3582689 (Ala. Civ. App. Aug. 15, 2008).
  • 199
    • 67549084642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State ex rel. SRS v. Bohrer, 189 P.3d 1157 (Kan. 2008).
    • State ex rel. SRS v. Bohrer, 189 P.3d 1157 (Kan. 2008).
  • 200
    • 67549084641 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • D. H. R. ex rel. Duckworth v. Kamp, 949 A.2d 43 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2008).
    • D. H. R. ex rel. Duckworth v. Kamp, 949 A.2d 43 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2008).
  • 201
    • 67549093205 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hubbard Cty. Health and Human Servs. v. Zacher, 742 N. W.2d 223 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). See also In re Marriage of Leoni, 180 P.3d 1060 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Hubbard Cty. Health and Human Servs. v. Zacher, 742 N. W.2d 223 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). See also In re Marriage of Leoni, 180 P.3d 1060 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 202
    • 67549106913 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Springer v. Damrich, 993 So. 2d 481 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008). See also In re Marriage of Matthews, 193 P.3d 466 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Springer v. Damrich, 993 So. 2d 481 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008). See also In re Marriage of Matthews, 193 P.3d 466 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 203
    • 67549089759 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bulgarelli v. Bulgarelli, 934 A.2d 107 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
    • Bulgarelli v. Bulgarelli, 934 A.2d 107 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
  • 204
    • 67549109347 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Santana v. Santana, 859 N. Y. S. 2d 219 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Santana v. Santana, 859 N. Y. S. 2d 219 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 205
    • 67549142324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strahan v. Strahan, 953 A.2d 1219 (N. J. Super Ct. App. Div. 2008).
    • Strahan v. Strahan, 953 A.2d 1219 (N. J. Super Ct. App. Div. 2008).
  • 206
    • 67549096652 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Harris v. Carter, 189 P. 3d 484 (Idaho Ct. App. 2008) ; Keck v. Jordan, 180 P.3d 889 (Wyo. 2008) (allowing a father to redact his new wife's income from their joint tax return to determine his income for child support).
    • Harris v. Carter, 189 P. 3d 484 (Idaho Ct. App. 2008) ; Keck v. Jordan, 180 P.3d 889 (Wyo. 2008) (allowing a father to redact his new wife's income from their joint tax return to determine his income for child support).
  • 207
    • 67549143984 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kestner v. Clark, 182 P.3d 1117 (Alaska 2008).
    • Kestner v. Clark, 182 P.3d 1117 (Alaska 2008).
  • 208
    • 67549105077 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nace v. Nace, 754 N. W.2d 820 (S. D. 2008).
    • Nace v. Nace, 754 N. W.2d 820 (S. D. 2008).
  • 209
    • 67549114477 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mariana D. v. Frank D., 858 N. Y. S.2d 864 (Fam. Ct. 2008) (education loans and grants parent received did not constitute income).
    • Mariana D. v. Frank D., 858 N. Y. S.2d 864 (Fam. Ct. 2008) (education loans and grants parent received did not constitute income).
  • 210
    • 67549129000 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gentile v. Carneiro, 946 A.2d 871 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008).
    • Gentile v. Carneiro, 946 A.2d 871 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008).
  • 211
    • 67549146562 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Ormiston, 188 P.3d 32 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Ormiston, 188 P.3d 32 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 212
    • 67549096584 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bellinger v. Bellinger, 847 N. Y. S.2d 783 (App. Div. 2007) ; see also Ola v. Ola, 985 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Bellinger v. Bellinger, 847 N. Y. S.2d 783 (App. Div. 2007) ; see also Ola v. Ola, 985 So. 2d 786 (La. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 213
    • 67549137459 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Blevins v. Blevins, 249 S. W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Blevins v. Blevins, 249 S. W.3d 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 214
    • 67549091449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bator v. Osborne, 983 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Bator v. Osborne, 983 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 215
    • 67549099272 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sawicki v. Haxby, 186 P.3d 546 (Alaska 2008).
    • Sawicki v. Haxby, 186 P.3d 546 (Alaska 2008).
  • 216
    • 67549118704 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kestner v. Clark, 182 P.3d 1117 (Alaska 2008).
    • Kestner v. Clark, 182 P.3d 1117 (Alaska 2008).
  • 218
    • 67549113843 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ibrahim v. Aziz, 953 A.2d 508 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
    • Ibrahim v. Aziz, 953 A.2d 508 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008).
  • 219
    • 67549086300 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kauth v. Bartlett, 746 N. W.2d 747 (S. D. 2007).
    • Kauth v. Bartlett, 746 N. W.2d 747 (S. D. 2007).
  • 220
    • 67549087986 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Seay, 746 N. W.2d 833 (Iowa 2008).
    • In re Seay, 746 N. W.2d 833 (Iowa 2008).
  • 221
    • 67549096585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Silver v. Pinksey, 200 WL 902715 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 4, 2008).
    • Silver v. Pinksey, 200 WL 902715 (Pa. Super. Ct. Apr. 4, 2008).
  • 222
    • 67549114479 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Young v. Young, 891 N. E.2d 1045 (Ind. 2008).
    • Young v. Young, 891 N. E.2d 1045 (Ind. 2008).
  • 223
    • 67549113888 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Smoske v. Sicher, 2007 WL 3052208 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2007).
    • Smoske v. Sicher, 2007 WL 3052208 (Ohio Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2007).
  • 224
    • 67549084640 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Devaney v. Miller, 662 S. E.2d 672 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Devaney v. Miller, 662 S. E.2d 672 (N. C. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 225
    • 67549109288 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Richardson v. Kohlin, 175 P.3d 43 (Alaska 2008).
    • Richardson v. Kohlin, 175 P.3d 43 (Alaska 2008).
  • 226
    • 67549094902 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Billingsley-Travis v. Travis, 2008 WL 2220681 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 28, 2008).
    • Billingsley-Travis v. Travis, 2008 WL 2220681 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 28, 2008).
  • 227
    • 67549134403 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Adkins v. Adkins, 656 S. E.2d 47 (W. Va. 2007).
    • Adkins v. Adkins, 656 S. E.2d 47 (W. Va. 2007).
  • 228
    • 67549086367 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clark v. Clark, 887 N. E.2d 1021 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Clark v. Clark, 887 N. E.2d 1021 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 229
    • 67549091450 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Edwards v. Edwards, 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 458 (Ct. App. 2008).
    • Edwards v. Edwards, 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 458 (Ct. App. 2008).
  • 230
    • 67549114480 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Carson v. Carson, 875 N. E.2d 484 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Carson v. Carson, 875 N. E.2d 484 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 231
    • 67549132175 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Waddington v. Cox. 247 S. W.3d 567 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Waddington v. Cox. 247 S. W.3d 567 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 232
    • 67549129001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sutherland v. Sutherland, 944 A.2d 395 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008).
    • Sutherland v. Sutherland, 944 A.2d 395 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008).
  • 233
    • 67549132708 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cubel v. Cubel, 876 N. E.2d 1117 (Ind. 2007).
    • Cubel v. Cubel, 876 N. E.2d 1117 (Ind. 2007).
  • 234
    • 67549101003 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State ex rel. DES v. Lee, 275 P.3d 85 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
    • State ex rel. DES v. Lee, 275 P.3d 85 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 235
    • 67549137460 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Draper v. Burke, 881 N. E.2d 122 (Mass. 2008), cert denied.
    • Draper v. Burke, 881 N. E.2d 122 (Mass. 2008), cert denied.
  • 236
    • 67549084578 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Basileh v. Alghusain, 890 N. E.2d 779 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (FFCCSOA allows tranfer of jurisdiction over support when all parties leave the state).
    • Basileh v. Alghusain, 890 N. E.2d 779 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (FFCCSOA allows tranfer of jurisdiction over support when all parties leave the state).
  • 237
    • 67549137463 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • DeGroot v. DeGroot, 939 A.2d 664 (D. C. 2008).
    • DeGroot v. DeGroot, 939 A.2d 664 (D. C. 2008).
  • 238
    • 67549119364 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trissler v. Trissler, 987 So. 2d 209 (Fla. Dist Ct. App. 2008).
    • Trissler v. Trissler, 987 So. 2d 209 (Fla. Dist Ct. App. 2008).
  • 239
    • 67549106835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Wills v. Wills, 745 N. W.2d 924 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). See also Spencer v. Spencer, 882 N. E.2d 886 (N. Y. 2008) (New York court had no authority to order a Connecticut resident to pay support to his college student son after his Connecticut support obligation expired).
    • Wills v. Wills, 745 N. W.2d 924 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). See also Spencer v. Spencer, 882 N. E.2d 886 (N. Y. 2008) (New York court had no authority to order a Connecticut resident to pay support to his college student son after his Connecticut support obligation expired).
  • 240
    • 67549132785 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mazza v. Hollis, 947 A.2d 1177 (D. C. 2008).
    • Mazza v. Hollis, 947 A.2d 1177 (D. C. 2008).
  • 241
    • 67549114540 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Arlington v. Dep't of Human. Res., 935 A.2d (Md. 2007).
    • Arlington v. Dep't of Human. Res., 935 A.2d (Md. 2007).
  • 242
    • 67549150645 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dep't of Rev. v. Nesbitt, 975 So. 2d 549 (Fla. Dist Ct. App. 2008).
    • Dep't of Rev. v. Nesbitt, 975 So. 2d 549 (Fla. Dist Ct. App. 2008).
  • 243
    • 67549101077 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Keith v. Purvis, 982 So. 2d 1033 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008). See also In re Parentage of Fairbanks, 176 P.3d 611 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Keith v. Purvis, 982 So. 2d 1033 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008). See also In re Parentage of Fairbanks, 176 P.3d 611 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 244
    • 67549120986 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Wilhelms v. Sexton, 2008 WL 725561 (Ark. Ct. App. Mar. 19, 2008).
    • Wilhelms v. Sexton, 2008 WL 725561 (Ark. Ct. App. Mar. 19, 2008).
  • 245
    • 67549146627 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Cole, 939
    • In re Cole, 939 A.2d 750 (N. H. 2007).
    • (2007) A.2d , vol.750 , Issue.H
  • 246
    • 67549134454 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Billings v. Odle, 891 N. E.2d 106 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Billings v. Odle, 891 N. E.2d 106 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 247
    • 67549146564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Vilander and Ormsbee, 186 P.3d 806 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). See also Abies v. Gladden, 664 S. E.2d 442 (S. C. 2008).
    • In re Marriage of Vilander and Ormsbee, 186 P.3d 806 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). See also Abies v. Gladden, 664 S. E.2d 442 (S. C. 2008).
  • 250
    • 67549137462 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States v. Fields, 500 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2007).
    • United States v. Fields, 500 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2007).
  • 251
    • 67549109289 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States v. Edelkind, 525 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2008).
    • United States v. Edelkind, 525 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2008).
  • 252
    • 67549135739 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State v. Stamm, 664 S. E.2d 161 (W. Va. Ct. App. 2008).
    • State v. Stamm, 664 S. E.2d 161 (W. Va. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 255
    • 67549121040 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marshall v. Marshall, 988 So. 2d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Marshall v. Marshall, 988 So. 2d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 256
    • 67549106912 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Davis v. Davis, 948 A.2d 1203 (D. C. 2008).
    • Davis v. Davis, 948 A.2d 1203 (D. C. 2008).
  • 257
    • 67549135741 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Greely, 943
    • Greely v. Greely, 943 A.2d 841 (N. J. 2008).
    • (2008) A.2d , vol.841 , Issue.J
    • Greely, V.1
  • 258
    • 67549109293 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chambers v. Ormiston, 935 A.2d 956 (R. I. 2007).
    • Chambers v. Ormiston, 935 A.2d 956 (R. I. 2007).
  • 259
    • 67549134407 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Wolff v. Wolff, 966 So. 2d 1202 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Wolff v. Wolff, 966 So. 2d 1202 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 260
    • 67549103885 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lister v. Lister, 981 So. 2d 340 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Lister v. Lister, 981 So. 2d 340 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 261
    • 67549144839 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Aleem v. Aleem, 947 A.2d 489 (Md. 2008).
    • Aleem v. Aleem, 947 A.2d 489 (Md. 2008).
  • 262
    • 67549094847 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MacKenzie v. Barthol, 173 P.3d 980 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
    • MacKenzie v. Barthol, 173 P.3d 980 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 263
    • 67549098279 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • R. M. v. Dr. R., 855 N. Y. S.2d 865 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
    • R. M. v. Dr. R., 855 N. Y. S.2d 865 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
  • 264
    • 67549094848 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Stapleford, 931
    • In re Stapleford, 931 A.2d 1199 (N. H. 2007).
    • (2007) A.2d , vol.1199 , Issue.H
  • 265
    • 67549101008 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hughes v. Hughes, 247 S. W.3d 59 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Hughes v. Hughes, 247 S. W.3d 59 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 266
    • 67549134455 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Taper v. Taper, 939 A.2d 969 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
    • Taper v. Taper, 939 A.2d 969 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
  • 267
    • 67549142278 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Schwartz ex rel. Estate of Schwartz v. Schwartz, 183 P.3d 552 (Colo. 2008).
    • Schwartz ex rel. Estate of Schwartz v. Schwartz, 183 P.3d 552 (Colo. 2008).
  • 268
    • 67549130380 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Wechsler v. Wechsler, 847 N. Y. S.2d 26 (App. Div. 2007).
    • Wechsler v. Wechsler, 847 N. Y. S.2d 26 (App. Div. 2007).
  • 269
    • 67549129006 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Burke v. Burke, 662 S. E.2d 622 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Burke v. Burke, 662 S. E.2d 622 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 270
    • 67549132710 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Copeland v. Copeland, 966 So. 2d 1040 (La. 2007).
    • Copeland v. Copeland, 966 So. 2d 1040 (La. 2007).
  • 271
    • 67549098275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Johanson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court ex rel. County of Clark, 173 P.3d 718 (Nev. 2007).
    • Johanson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court ex rel. County of Clark, 173 P.3d 718 (Nev. 2007).
  • 272
    • 67549119289 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Caplan v. Donovan, 879 N. E.2d 117 (Mass. 2008).
    • Caplan v. Donovan, 879 N. E.2d 117 (Mass. 2008).
  • 273
    • 67549148516 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • C. V. v. T. B., 853 N. Y. S.2d 510 (N. Y. Fam. Ct. 2008).
    • C. V. v. T. B., 853 N. Y. S.2d 510 (N. Y. Fam. Ct. 2008).
  • 274
    • 67549084582 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Custer v. Cochran, 933 A.2d 1050 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
    • Custer v. Cochran, 933 A.2d 1050 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007).
  • 275
    • 67549114488 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benjamin v. McKinnon, 887 N. E.2d 14 (Ill App. Ct. 2008).
    • Benjamin v. McKinnon, 887 N. E.2d 14 (Ill App. Ct. 2008).
  • 276
    • 67549094854 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Corwell v. Corwell, 179 P.3d 821 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
    • Corwell v. Corwell, 179 P.3d 821 (Utah Ct. App. 2008).
  • 277
    • 67549084639 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • L'Heureux v. Michaud, 938 A.2d 801 (Me.2007).
    • L'Heureux v. Michaud, 938 A.2d 801 (Me.2007).
  • 278
    • 67549106911 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 279
    • 67549098326 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Crop v. Crop, 188 P.3d 364 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Crop v. Crop, 188 P.3d 364 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 280
    • 67549099349 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sparks v. Deveny, 189 P.3d 1268 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Sparks v. Deveny, 189 P.3d 1268 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 281
    • 67549086307 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Weissenburger v. Iowa District Court, 740 N. W.2d 431 (Iowa 2007).
    • Weissenburger v. Iowa District Court, 740 N. W.2d 431 (Iowa 2007).
  • 282
    • 67549129064 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Moore v. Moore, 657 S. E.2d 743 (S. C. 2008).
    • Moore v. Moore, 657 S. E.2d 743 (S. C. 2008).
  • 283
    • 67549088038 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Id
    • Id.
  • 284
    • 67549116990 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State v. Deal, 740 N. W.2d 755 (Minn. 2007,).
    • State v. Deal, 740 N. W.2d 755 (Minn. 2007,).
  • 285
    • 67549089758 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re E. F. G., 942 A.2d 166 (N. J. Super. Ct. A. D. App. Div. 2008) (a trial court erred in denying a name change to a domestic violence victim who was unwilling to comply with notice publication rule).
    • In re E. F. G., 942 A.2d 166 (N. J. Super. Ct. A. D. App. Div. 2008) (a trial court erred in denying a name change to a domestic violence victim who was unwilling to comply with notice publication rule).
  • 286
    • 67549148574 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State v. Price, 886 N. E.2d 852 (Ohio 2008).
    • State v. Price, 886 N. E.2d 852 (Ohio 2008).
  • 287
    • 67549146626 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • P, Cal
    • In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. 2008).
    • (2008) In re Marriage Cases , vol.183
  • 288
    • 67549103941 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conaway v. Deane, 932 A.2d 571 (Md. 2007).
    • Conaway v. Deane, 932 A.2d 571 (Md. 2007).
  • 289
    • 67549093202 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Chambers v. Ormiston, 935 A.2d 956 (R. I. 2007).
    • Chambers v. Ormiston, 935 A.2d 956 (R. I. 2007).
  • 290
    • 67549091508 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • O'Darling v. O'Darling, 188 P.3d 137 (Okla. 2008).
    • O'Darling v. O'Darling, 188 P.3d 137 (Okla. 2008).
  • 291
    • 67549096651 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Martinez v. County of Monroe, 850 N. Y. S.2d 740 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Martinez v. County of Monroe, 850 N. Y. S.2d 740 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 292
    • 67549086365 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Beth R. v. Donna M., 853 N. Y. S.2d 501 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
    • Beth R. v. Donna M., 853 N. Y. S.2d 501 (Sup. Ct. 2008).
  • 293
    • 67549116991 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State Bd. of Equalization, 66 Cal. Rptr
    • Strong v. State Bd. of Equalization, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 657 (Ct. App. 2007).
    • (2007) 3d 657 (Ct. App
    • Strong, V.1
  • 295
    • 67549101076 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nat'l Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N. W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).
    • Nat'l Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N. W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).
  • 298
    • 67549115080 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re J. M. N., 2008 WL 2415490 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 13, 2008).
    • In re J. M. N., 2008 WL 2415490 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 13, 2008).
  • 299
    • 67549144058 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • McPeek v. McCardle, 888 N. E.2d 171 (Ind. 2008).
    • McPeek v. McCardle, 888 N. E.2d 171 (Ind. 2008).
  • 300
    • 67549105143 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re A. C. S., 171 P.3d 1148 (Alaska 2007).
    • In re A. C. S., 171 P.3d 1148 (Alaska 2007).
  • 301
    • 67549129065 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jenkins v. Austin, 255 S. W.3d 24 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Jenkins v. Austin, 255 S. W.3d 24 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 302
    • 67549093146 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hunter v. Haunert, 270 S. W.3d 339 (Ark. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Hunter v. Haunert, 270 S. W.3d 339 (Ark. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 303
    • 67549124863 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re M. J. T., 189 P.3d 745 (Okla. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re M. J. T., 189 P.3d 745 (Okla. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 304
    • 67549144845 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re H. M. C., 876 N. E.2d 805 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re H. M. C., 876 N. E.2d 805 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 305
    • 67549121039 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • WL 4099505 Ohio Ct. App. Nov. 19
    • In re M. W. R., 2007 WL 4099505 (Ohio Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2007).
    • (2007)
    • In re, M.W.R.1
  • 307
    • 67549093201 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Swatek-Briggs, 746 N. W.2d 279 (Iowa Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Swatek-Briggs, 746 N. W.2d 279 (Iowa Ct. App. 2008).
  • 308
    • 67549106839 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Paternity of T. J. D. C., 750 N. W.2d 957 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Paternity of T. J. D. C., 750 N. W.2d 957 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 309
    • 67549146567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pearson v. Pearson, 182 P.3d 353 (Utah 2008).
    • Pearson v. Pearson, 182 P.3d 353 (Utah 2008).
  • 310
    • 67549099281 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • J. N. R. v. O'Reilly, 264 S. W.3d 587 (Ky. 2008).
    • J. N. R. v. O'Reilly, 264 S. W.3d 587 (Ky. 2008).
  • 311
    • 67549103881 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fowler v. State Dep't of Rev., 168 P.3d 870 (Alaska 2007).
    • Fowler v. State Dep't of Rev., 168 P.3d 870 (Alaska 2007).
  • 312
    • 67549137465 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Payne v. France, 373 Ark. 175 (2008).
    • Payne v. France, 373 Ark. 175 (2008).
  • 313
    • 67549114483 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mr. T. v. Ms. T., 662 S. E.2d 413 (S. C. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Mr. T. v. Ms. T., 662 S. E.2d 413 (S. C. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 314
    • 67549101009 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Paternity of M. M., 889 N. E.2d 846 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Paternity of M. M., 889 N. E.2d 846 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 315
    • 67549132181 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gerhardt v. C. K., 751 N. W.2d 702 (N. D. 2008).
    • Gerhardt v. C. K., 751 N. W.2d 702 (N. D. 2008).
  • 316
    • 67549140137 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Burden v. Burden, 945 A.2d 656 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2008).
    • Burden v. Burden, 945 A.2d 656 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2008).
  • 317
    • 67549114487 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Gendron, 950 A.2d 151 (N. H. 2008) ; In re Paternity of H. H., 879 N. E.2d 1175 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). See also Hinshaw (Lenarz) v. Hinshaw, 237 S. W.3d 170 (Ky. 2007).
    • In re Gendron, 950 A.2d 151 (N. H. 2008) ; In re Paternity of H. H., 879 N. E.2d 1175 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). See also Hinshaw (Lenarz) v. Hinshaw, 237 S. W.3d 170 (Ky. 2007).
  • 318
    • 67549102121 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Estes v. Titus, 751 N. W.2d 493 (Mich. 2008).
    • Estes v. Titus, 751 N. W.2d 493 (Mich. 2008).
  • 319
    • 67549094851 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Parentage of G. E. M., 890 N. E.2d 944 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
    • In re Parentage of G. E. M., 890 N. E.2d 944 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
  • 320
    • 67549150646 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lebanon County Children's Youth Servs. v. Wagner, 948 A.2d 871 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
    • Lebanon County Children's Youth Servs. v. Wagner, 948 A.2d 871 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
  • 321
    • 67549094849 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dantzig v. Biron, 2008 WL 187532 (Ohio Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2008).
    • Dantzig v. Biron, 2008 WL 187532 (Ohio Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2008).
  • 322
    • 67549093142 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Baker v. Baker, 753 N. W.2d 644 (Minn. 2008).
    • Baker v. Baker, 753 N. W.2d 644 (Minn. 2008).
  • 323
    • 67549144840 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Blay v. Blay, 857 N. Y. S.2d 784 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Blay v. Blay, 857 N. Y. S.2d 784 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 324
    • 67549087992 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • O'Connell v. O'Connell, 889 N. E.2d 1 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • O'Connell v. O'Connell, 889 N. E.2d 1 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 325
    • 67549127277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shafer v. Shafer, 741 N. W.2d 173 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Shafer v. Shafer, 741 N. W.2d 173 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 326
    • 67549093145 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Finan v. Finan, 949 A.2d 468 (Conn. 2008). See also In re Marriage of Fennelly, 737 N. W.2d 97 (Iowa 2007) (finding dissipation where husband took unexplained cash advances on his credit cards at end of marriage).
    • Finan v. Finan, 949 A.2d 468 (Conn. 2008). See also In re Marriage of Fennelly, 737 N. W.2d 97 (Iowa 2007) (finding dissipation where husband took unexplained cash advances on his credit cards at end of marriage).
  • 327
    • 67549130384 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gershman v. Gershman, 943 A.2d 1091 (Conn. 2008).
    • Gershman v. Gershman, 943 A.2d 1091 (Conn. 2008).
  • 328
    • 67549129009 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judge v. Judge, 851 N. Y. S.2d 639 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Judge v. Judge, 851 N. Y. S.2d 639 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 329
    • 67549130382 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Higgins v. Higgins, 857 N. Y. S.2d 171 (App. Div. 2008).
    • Higgins v. Higgins, 857 N. Y. S.2d 171 (App. Div. 2008).
  • 330
    • 67549113847 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nornes v. Nornes, 884 N. E.2d 886 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Nornes v. Nornes, 884 N. E.2d 886 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 331
    • 67549130383 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ahern v. Ahern, 938 A.2d 35 (Me. 2008).
    • Ahern v. Ahern, 938 A.2d 35 (Me. 2008).
  • 332
    • 67549146568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Von Hohn v. Von Hohn, 260 S. W.3d 631 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Von Hohn v. Von Hohn, 260 S. W.3d 631 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 333
    • 67549144843 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Keyt v. Keyt, 244 S. W.3d 321 (Tenn. 2007).
    • Keyt v. Keyt, 244 S. W.3d 321 (Tenn. 2007).
  • 334
    • 67549146572 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hedges v. Pitcher, 942 A.2d 1217 (Me. 2008).
    • Hedges v. Pitcher, 942 A.2d 1217 (Me. 2008).
  • 335
    • 67549127272 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Schmedeman, 190 P.3d 788 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
    • In re Marriage of Schmedeman, 190 P.3d 788 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 336
    • 67549120994 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sternesky v. Salcie-Sternesky, 933 A.2d 956 (N. J. Super. Ct., A. D. 2007).
    • Sternesky v. Salcie-Sternesky, 933 A.2d 956 (N. J. Super. Ct., A. D. 2007).
  • 337
    • 67549137466 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dinges v. Dinges, 743 N. W.2d 662 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Dinges v. Dinges, 743 N. W.2d 662 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 338
    • 67549089704 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Janusz v. Gilliam, 947 A.2d 560 (Md. 2008).
    • Janusz v. Gilliam, 947 A.2d 560 (Md. 2008).
  • 339
    • 67549103888 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See also Hallingby v. Hallingby, 541 F. Supp. 2d 591 (S. D. N. Y. 2008). See also Kennedy v. DuPont Sav. and Inv. Plan, 2009 WL 160440 (U. S. 2009).
    • See also Hallingby v. Hallingby, 541 F. Supp. 2d 591 (S. D. N. Y. 2008). See also Kennedy v. DuPont Sav. and Inv. Plan, 2009 WL 160440 (U. S. 2009).
  • 340
    • 67549102116 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Flusty, 545 F. Supp. 2d 624 (E. D. Mich. 2008). See also Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Flusty, 43 Employee Benefits Cas. 1609 (E. D. Mich 2008) (stating that wife's waiver of any interest in her husband's ERISA-covered life insurance policy in a divorce decree means she cannot receive the proceeds following his death).
    • Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Flusty, 545 F. Supp. 2d 624 (E. D. Mich. 2008). See also Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Flusty, 43 Employee Benefits Cas. 1609 (E. D. Mich 2008) (stating that wife's waiver of any interest in her husband's ERISA-covered life insurance policy in a divorce decree means she cannot receive the proceeds following his death).
  • 341
    • 67549119291 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Sauers, 2008 WL 1991488 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008) (opinion withdrawn). The United States Supreme Court had already decided this issue in Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U. S. 141 (2001).
    • In re Sauers, 2008 WL 1991488 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008) (opinion withdrawn). The United States Supreme Court had already decided this issue in Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U. S. 141 (2001).
  • 342
    • 67549143990 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Brown ex rel. Estate of Sanger v. Wright, 511 F. Supp. 2d 850 (E. D. Mich 2007).
    • Brown ex rel. Estate of Sanger v. Wright, 511 F. Supp. 2d 850 (E. D. Mich 2007).
  • 343
    • 67549127275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Cline, 2007 WL 1549603 (E. D. Wash. May 24, 2007) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
    • Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Cline, 2007 WL 1549603 (E. D. Wash. May 24, 2007) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
  • 344
    • 67549105081 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Couch v. Reinhold, 43 Employee Benefits Cas. 2865 (W. D. Mich. 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
    • Couch v. Reinhold, 43 Employee Benefits Cas. 2865 (W. D. Mich. 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
  • 345
    • 67549143991 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Robinson v. New Orleans Employers ILA AFL-CIO Pension Welfare Vacation and Holiday Funds, 269 Fed. Appx. 516 (5th Cir. 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
    • Robinson v. New Orleans Employers ILA AFL-CIO Pension Welfare Vacation and Holiday Funds, 269 Fed. Appx. 516 (5th Cir. 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
  • 346
    • 67549105080 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Murr v. Case New Holland, Inc., 2008 WL 2626999 (D. Neb. June 26, 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
    • Murr v. Case New Holland, Inc., 2008 WL 2626999 (D. Neb. June 26, 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
  • 347
    • 67549132182 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Taliaferro v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 265 Fed. App'x 240 (5th Cir. 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
    • Taliaferro v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 265 Fed. App'x 240 (5th Cir. 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
  • 348
    • 67549102117 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Guy, 169 P.3d 1218 (Okla. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Marriage of Guy, 169 P.3d 1218 (Okla. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 349
    • 67549135681 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Allen v. Allen, 941 A.2d 510 (Md. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Allen v. Allen, 941 A.2d 510 (Md. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 351
    • 67549118640 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Forrester v. Forrester, 953 A.2d 175 (Del. 2008) (opinion superseded 196 F.3d 215).
    • Forrester v. Forrester, 953 A.2d 175 (Del. 2008) (opinion superseded 196 F.3d 215).
  • 352
    • 67549106842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Diaz v. Diaz, 970 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Diaz v. Diaz, 970 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 353
    • 67549124865 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patrick v. A. K. Steele Corp., 44 Employee Benefits Cas. 1076 (S. D. Ohio 2008).
    • Patrick v. A. K. Steele Corp., 44 Employee Benefits Cas. 1076 (S. D. Ohio 2008).
  • 354
    • 67549150649 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Blaine v. Blaine, 744 N. W.2d 444 (Neb. 2008).
    • Blaine v. Blaine, 744 N. W.2d 444 (Neb. 2008).
  • 355
    • 67549094852 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • McKeon v. Guardian Ins. and Annuity Co., 43 Employee Benefits Cas. 1233 (D. Conn. 2007).
    • McKeon v. Guardian Ins. and Annuity Co., 43 Employee Benefits Cas. 1233 (D. Conn. 2007).
  • 356
    • 67549124866 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mattingly v. Hoge, 42 Employee Benefits Cas. 2211 (6th Cir. 2008).
    • Mattingly v. Hoge, 42 Employee Benefits Cas. 2211 (6th Cir. 2008).
  • 358
    • 67549148520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Wade v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n-Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension Plan, 42 Employee Benefits Cas. 2787 (E. D. Va. 2007).
    • Wade v. Hampton Roads Shipping Ass'n-Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension Plan, 42 Employee Benefits Cas. 2787 (E. D. Va. 2007).
  • 359
    • 67549137468 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Partnership of Rhone and Butcher, 166 P.3d 1230 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Partnership of Rhone and Butcher, 166 P.3d 1230 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 360
    • 67549086306 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bancoskey v. Bancoskey, 167 P.3d 705 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
    • Bancoskey v. Bancoskey, 167 P.3d 705 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 361
    • 67549127278 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Crayk v. Glover, 176 P.3d 645 (Wyo. 2008).
    • Crayk v. Glover, 176 P.3d 645 (Wyo. 2008).
  • 363
    • 67549102119 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Costa, 937
    • In re Costa, 937 A.2d 288 (N. H. 2007).
    • (2007) A.2d , vol.288 , Issue.H
  • 364
    • 67549099279 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Rockwell, 2007 WL 2411694 (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 27, 2007) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
    • In re Rockwell, 2007 WL 2411694 (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 27, 2007) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
  • 365
    • 67549089702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mesholam v. Mesholam, 892 N. E.2d 846 (N. Y. 2008).
    • Mesholam v. Mesholam, 892 N. E.2d 846 (N. Y. 2008).
  • 366
    • 67549127273 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Heifer v. Heifer, 656 S. E.2d 70 (W. Va. 2007).
    • Heifer v. Heifer, 656 S. E.2d 70 (W. Va. 2007).
  • 367
    • 67549119296 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Franklin v. Franklin, 988 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Franklin v. Franklin, 988 So. 2d 125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 368
    • 67549130385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Mattel, 944
    • In re Mattel, 944 A.2d 575 (N. H. 2008).
    • (2008) A.2d , vol.575 , Issue.H
  • 369
    • 67549091452 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Finan v. Finan, 949 A.2d 468 (Conn. 2008).
    • Finan v. Finan, 949 A.2d 468 (Conn. 2008).
  • 370
    • 67549134409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gershman v. Gershman, 943 A.2d 1091 (Conn. 2008).
    • Gershman v. Gershman, 943 A.2d 1091 (Conn. 2008).
  • 371
    • 67549119294 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Estes v. Titus, 751 N. W.2d 493 (Mich. 2008).
    • Estes v. Titus, 751 N. W.2d 493 (Mich. 2008).
  • 372
    • 67549089700 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Charron v. Amaral, 889 N. E.2d 946 (Mass. 2008).
    • Charron v. Amaral, 889 N. E.2d 946 (Mass. 2008).
  • 373
    • 67549102118 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Marriage of Amich and Adiutori, 192 P.3d 422 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
    • In re Marriage of Amich and Adiutori, 192 P.3d 422 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
  • 375
    • 67549101011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Khalifa v. Shannon, 945 A.2d 1244 (Md. 2008).
    • Khalifa v. Shannon, 945 A.2d 1244 (Md. 2008).
  • 376
    • 67549118641 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bailey v. Bailey, 2008 WL 324156 (E. D. Mich. Feb. 6, 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
    • Bailey v. Bailey, 2008 WL 324156 (E. D. Mich. Feb. 6, 2008) (unpublished; text in Westlaw).
  • 377
    • 67549119295 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Russin v. Wesson, 949 A.2d 1019 (Vt. 2008).
    • Russin v. Wesson, 949 A.2d 1019 (Vt. 2008).
  • 378
    • 67549086303 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Harbert, 741 N. W.2d 228 (S. D. 2007).
    • State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Harbert, 741 N. W.2d 228 (S. D. 2007).
  • 379
    • 67549115026 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Angelo v. Angelo, 175 P.3d 1096 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Angelo v. Angelo, 175 P.3d 1096 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 380
    • 67549093143 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peterka v. Dennis, 744 N. W.2d 28 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008).
    • Peterka v. Dennis, 744 N. W.2d 28 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008).
  • 381
    • 67549142279 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 74 Cal. Rptr
    • Ortega v. Sacramento County Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 390 (Ct. App. 2008).
    • (2008) 3d 390 (Ct. App
    • Sacramento County, O.V.1
  • 382
    • 67549114485 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Zellmer v. Zellmer, 188 P.3d 497 (Wash. 2008).
    • Zellmer v. Zellmer, 188 P.3d 497 (Wash. 2008).


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.