Dilemmas when working with substance abusers with multiple and complex problems: The case manager's perspective

International Journal of Social Welfare

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 270-280

  Kolind, Torsten ^a,c   Vanderplasschen, Wouter ^b   De Maeyer, Jessica ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c Center for Rusmiddelforskning   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Belgium; Case management; Coordination; Denmark; Qualitative research; Substance abuse; Substance abuse treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 67549089699     PISSN: 13696866     EISSN: 14682397     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00608.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Asmussen V (2006). On whose terms? User participation in Danish methadone maintenance treatment. In: Anker J, Asmussen V, Kouvonen P, Tops D, eds. Drug users and spaces for legitimate action. NAD no. 49. Helsinki, NAD-Publications.
2. Asmussen V, Kolind T (2005). Udvidet psykosocial indsats i metadonbehandling. Resultater fra en kvalitativ evaluering af fire metadonforsøgsprojekter [Enhanced psychosocial support in methadone treatment. Results from a qualitative evaluation of four methadone pilot projects]. Aarhus, Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, University of Aarhus.
3. Bacchus L, Marsden J, Griffiths P, Gossop M, Farrell M, Clarke K, Strang J (1999). Client perceptions of inpatient treatment. A qualitative account with implications for service delivery. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 6: 87-97.
4. Boehm A, Staples LH (2002). The functions of the social worker in empowering: The voices of consumers and professionals. Social Work 47: 449-460.
5. Brindis CD, Theidon KS (1997). The role of case management in substance abuse treatment services for women and their children. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 29: 79-88.
6. Broekaert E, Soyez V, Vanderplasschen W, Vandevelde D, Bradt R, Morival M, Kaplan C (2001). The video addiction challenge test: A new instrument for qualitative substance abuse assessment, treatment planning and research in therapeutic communities. International Journal of Social Welfare 10: 134-141.
7. Brun C, Rapp R (2001). Strengths-based case management: Individuals' perspectives on strengths and the case manager relations. Social Work 46: 278-288.
8. Coviello DM, Zanis DA, Wesnoski SA, Alterman AI (2006). The effectiveness of outreach case management in re-enrolling discharged methadone patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 85: 56-65.
9. Cruikshank B (1999). The will to empower. Democratic citizens and other subjects. London, Cornell University Press.
10. Godley S, Godley M, Pratt A, Wallace J (1994). Case management services for adolescent substance abusers: A program description. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 11: 309-317.
11. Graham K, Birchmore-Timney C (1990). Case management in addictions treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 7: 181-188.
12. Hall JA, Carswell C, Walsh E, Huber DL, Jampoler JS (2002). Iowa case management: Innovative social casework. Social Work 47: 132-141.
13. Hesse M, Broekaert E, Fridell M, Rapp RC, Vanderplasschen W (2007). Case management for persons with substance use disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, article no. CD006265.
14. Hesse M, Pedersen MU (2008). Easy-access services in low-threshold opiate agonist maintenance. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 6: 316-324.
15. Holloway F, Carson J (2001). Case management: An update. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 47(3): 21-31.
16. Huber DL, Sarrazin MV, Vaughn T, Hall JA (2003). Evaluating the impact of case management dosage. Nursing Research 52: 276-288.
17. Hunt G, Rosenbaum M (1998). 'Hustling' within the clinic: Consumer perspectives on methadone maintenance treatment. In: Inciardi JA, Harrison LD, eds. Heroin in the age of crack-cocaine. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
18. Jerrell JM, Ridgely MS (1999). Impact of robustness of program implementation on outcomes of clients in dual diagnosis programs. Psychiatric Services 50: 109-112.
19. Kolind T (2007). Form or content. The application of user perspectives in treatment research. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 14: 261-275.
20. Kuhn S, Schu M, Vogt I, Schmid M, Simmedinger R, Schlanstedt G. et al. (2006). Das bundesdeutsche modellprojekt zur heroingestützen behandlung opiatabhängiger - eine multizentrische, randomisierte, kontrollierte therapiestudie: Spezialstudie der binnenevaluation der psychosozialen begleitung [The German heroin trial of opiate addicted persons: A multi-centred, randomized and controlled study: Specific evaluation of the psychosocial treatment]. Hamburg, Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Suchtförschung der Universität Hamburg.
21. Lambert MJ (2003). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In: Norcross JC, Goldfried MR, eds. Handbook of psychotherapy integration. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
22. Leonardsen D (2007). Empowerment in social work: An individual vs. a relational perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare 16: 3-11.
23. Lilly R, Quirk A, Rhodes T, Stimson G (2000). Sociality in methadone treatment: Understanding methadone treatment and service delivery as a social process. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 7: 163-178.
24. Mahs BM (2002). Jeg har planer, eller har jeg? - Sociale handleplaner og praksis [I have plans or do I? - Social activity plans and practice]. Copenhagen, Fokus.
25. McLellan AT, Hagan TA, Levine M, Meyers K, Gould F, Bencivengo M. et al. (1999). Does clinical case management improve outpatient addiction treatment? Drug and Alcohol Dependence 55: 91-103.
26. Morgenstern J, Blanchard KA, McCrady BS, McVeigh KH, Morgan TJ, Pandina RJ (2006). Effectiveness of intensive case management for substance-dependent women receiving temporary assistance for needy families. American Journal of Public Health 96: 2016-2023.
27. Morse GA, Calsyn RJ, Klinkenberg WD, Helminiak TW, Wollf N, Drake RE. et al. (2006). Treating homeless clients with severe mental illness and substance use disorders: Costs and outcomes. Community Mental Health Journal 42: 377-404.
28. Moxley DP (1989). The Practice of Case Management. London, Sage.
29. Neale J (1998). Drug users' views of drug service providers. Health and Social Care in the Community 6: 308-317.
30. Noel PE (2006). The impact of therapeutic case management on participation in adolescent substance abuse treatment. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 32: 311-327.
31. Ontwikkelcentrum Sociaal Verslavingsbeleid (2003). Handreiking voor casemanagers in de sociale verslavingszorg [Manual for case managers in social addiction care]. Utrecht, Resultaten Scoren.
32. Pedersen MU (2005). Heroin-afhængige i metadonbehandling. Den medicinske og psykosociale indsats [Heroin addicts and methadone treatment. Medical and psychosocial services]. Aarhus, Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, University of Aarhus.
33. Rapp RC (2006). Strengths-based case management: Enhancing treatment for persons with substance abuse problems. In: Saleebey D, ed. The strengths perspective in social work practice, 4th edn., pp. 128-147. Boston, Allyn & Bacon.
34. Rapp RC, Siegal HA, Li L, Saha P (1998). Predicting post-primary treatment services and drug use outcome: A multivariate analysis. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 24: 603-615.
35. Rapp RC, Otto AL, Lane DT, Redko C, McGatha S, Carlson RC (2008). Improving linkage with substance abuse treatment using brief case management and motivational interviewing. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 94: 172-182.
36. Ridgely MS (1996). Practical issues in the application of case management to substance abuse treatment. In: Siegal H, Rapp R, eds. Case management and substance abuse treatment: Practice and experience, pp. 1-20. New York, Springer Publishing Company.
37. Ridgely MS, Willenbring M (1992). Application of case management to drug abuse treatment: Overview of models and research issues. In: Ashery RS, ed. Progress and issues in case management (NIDA Research Monograph 127) pp. 12-33. Rockville, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
38. Roeg DP, Van de Goor IA, Garretsen HF (2005). Towards quality indicators for assertive outreach programmes for severely impaired substance abusers: Concept mapping with Dutch experts. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 17: 203-208.
39. Roeg DP, Van de Goor IA, Garretsen HF (2007). European approach to assertive Outreach for substance users: Assessment of program components. Substance Use & Misuse 42: 1705-1721.
40. Saleebey D (2006). Introduction: Power in the people. In: Saleebey D, ed. The strengths perspective in social work practice. Boston, Pearson Education.
41. Sargent P, Pickard S, Sheaff R, Boaden R (2007). Patient and carer perceptions of case management for long-term conditions. Health & Social Care in the Community 15: 511-519.
42. Schu M, Schmid M, Görgen W, Vogt I, Oliva H (2002). Case management mit integriertem Motivational Interviewing im bundesdeutschen Modellprojekt zur heroingestützten Behandlung Opiatabhängiger - eine multizentrische, randomisierte, kontrollierte Therapiestudie: Manual [Case management with integrated Motivational Interviewing in the German heroin trial of opiate addicted persons: A multi-centred, randomized and controlled study: Manual]. Köln, Heroinstudie.de.
43. Scott CK, Sherman RE, Foss MA, Godley M, Hristova L (2002). Impact of centralized intake on case management services. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 34: 51-57.
44. Siegal HA, Rapp RC, Kelliher CW, Fisher JH, Wagner JH, Cole PA (1995). The strengths perspective of case management: A promising inpatient substance abuse treatment enhancement. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 27: 67-72.
45. Sorensen JL, Dilley J, London J, Okin RL, Delucchi KL, Phibbs CS (2003). Case management for substance abusers with HIV/AIDS: A randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 29: 133-150.
46. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMHSA) (1998). Comprehensive case management for substance abuse treatment (TIP Series 27). Rockville, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
47. Van Ooijen-Houben M (1998). Het zorgplan: Leidraad bij het werken met zorgplannen in de ggz en verslavingszorg [The treatment plan: Guidelines for working with treatment plans in mental health and addiction care]. Utrecht, Trimbos-instituut.
48. Vanderplasschen W, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Oost P (2002). Coordination and Continuity of Care in Substance Abuse Treatment. European Addiction Research 8: 10-21.
49. Vanderplasschen W, Rapp RC, Wolf J, Broekaert E (2004). The development and implementation of case management for substance use disorders in North America and Europe. Psychiatric Services 55: 913-922.
50. Vanderplasschen W, De Maeyer J (2007). The practice of case management for substance abusers: What's in a name? Adiktologie 7: 460-469.
51. Vanderplasschen W, Mostien B, Franssen A, Lievens K, De Maeyer J, Broekaert E (2007a). Dealing with multiple and frequent service utilisation in substance abuse treatment: Experiences with coordination of care in residential substance agencies in the region of Ghent, Belgium. International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 28: 74-89.
52. Vanderplasschen W, Wolf J, Rapp RC, Broekaert E (2007b). Effectiveness of different models of case management for substance-abusing populations. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 39: 81-93.