Implementation fidelity: The experience of the Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention Study

Health Education Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 394-406

  Sloboda, Zili ^a   Stephens, Peggy ^a   Pyakuryal, Amod ^a   Teasdale, Brent ^a   Stephens, Richard C ^a   Hawthorne, Richard D ^a   Marquette, Jesse ^a   Williams, Joseph E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; MALE; MEDIATOR; PREVENTION STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADULT; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 67449152752     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyn035     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kaftarian SJ, Robertson E, Compton W et al. Blending prevention research and practice in schools: critical issues and suggestions. Prev Sci. 2004; 5: 1.
2. Pentz MA. Form follows function: designs for prevention effectiveness and diffusion research. Prev Sci. 2004; 5: 23.
3. Greenberg MT. Current and future challenges in school-based prevention: the researcher perspective. Prev Sci. 2004; 5: 5.
4. Botvin GJ. Advancing prevention science and practice: challenges, critical issues, and future directions. Prev Sci. 2004; 5:69.
5. Hallfors D, Godette D. Will the 'principles of effectiveness' improve prevention practice? Early findings from a diffusion study. Health Educ Res. 2002; 17: 461.
6. Ennett ST, Ringwalt CL, Thorne J et al. A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings. Prev Sci. 2003; 4: 1.
7. Rohrbach LA, Graham JW, Hansen WB. Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: predictors of program implementation. Prev Sci. 1993; 22: 237.
8. Pentz MA, Trebow E, Hansen WB et al. Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: the midwestern prevention project (MPP). Eval Rev. 1990; 14: 264.
9. Tobler NS, Stratton HH. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the research. J Prim Prev. 1997; 18: 71.
10. Pentz MA, Trebow E. Implementation Issues in Drug Abuse Prevention Research. Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 1991 No. NIDA Research Monograph 107.
11. Botvin GJ, Eli B, Dusenbury L et al. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in white middle-class population. J Am Med Assoc. 1995; 273: 1106.
12. Hansen WB, Graham JW, Wolkenstein BH et al. Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness: results for fifth-grade students in the adolescent alcohol prevention trial. J Stud Alcohol. 1991; 52: 568.
13. Hansen WB, McNeal Jr RB, Ralph B. Drug education practice: results of an observational study. Health Educ Res. 1999; 14: 85.
14. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M et al. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18: 237.
15. Resnicow K, Cross D, Wynder EL. The know your body program: a review of evaluation studies. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1993; 70: 188.
16. Abbott RD, O'Donnell J, Hawkins DJ et al. Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1998; 68: 542.
17. Basen-Engquist K, O'Hara-Tompkins N, Lovato CY et al. The effect of two types of teacher training on implementation of smart choices: a tobacco prevention curriculum. J Sch Health 1994; 64: 334.
18. Kam CM, Greenberg MT, Walls CT. Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Promoting alternative thinking skills curriculum. Prev Sci. 2003; 4: 55.
19. Spoth R, Redmond C, Shin C. Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: extending a public-health oriented research base. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998; 66: 385.
20. Perry CL, Murray DM, Griffin G. Evaluating the statewide dissemination of smoking prevention curricula: factors in teacher compliance. J Sch Health 1990; 60: 501.
21. Sobol DF, Dent CW, Gleason L et al. The integrity of smoking prevention curriculum delivery. Health Educ Res. 1989; 4:59.
22. Hahn EJ, Noland MP, Rayens MK et al. Efficacy of training and fidelity of implementation of the life skills training program. J Sch Health 2002; 72: 282.
23. Ennett SL, Tobler NS, Ringwalt CL et al. How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 1394-1401.
24. Merrill J, Dilascio T, Pinsky I. Law enforcement and drug prevention: a profile of the D.A.R.E. officer. Police Chief 2006; 69: 81.
25. Bryk A, Raudenbush S, Congdon R. HLM: hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International. 1996.