Species as ranked taxa

Systematic Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 74-86

  Baum, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; FOSSIL; HUMAN; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; FOSSILS; GENETIC SPECIATION; HUMANS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 67449149017     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp011     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ané C., Larget B., Baum D.A., Smith S.D., Rokas A. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 412-426.
2. Ané C., Sanderson M.J. 2005. Missing the forest for the trees: phyiogenetic compression and its implications for inferring complex evolutionary histories. Syst. Biol. 54:146-157.
3. Avise J.C., Mitchell D. 2007. Time to standardize taxonomies. Syst. Biol. 56:130-133.
4. Baum D.A. 1.998. Individuality and the existence of species through time. Syst. Biol. 47:641-653.
5. Baum.D.A.2007.Concordancetrees,concordancefactors,andtheexploration, ofreticulategenealogy.Taxon.56:417-426.(Pubitemid47025837)
6. Baum D.A., Shaw K.L. 1995. Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In: Hoch P.C., Stephenson A.G., editors. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. p. 289-303.
7. BrummittR.K.2002.How-chopupatree.Taxon.51:31-41.(Pubitemid34475834)
8. Cantino P.D., Bryant H.N., de Queiroz K., Donoghue M.J., Eriksson T., Hillis D.M., Lee M.S.Y. 1999. Species names in phyiogenetic nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 48:790-807.
9. Cracraft J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. In: Johnston R., editor. Current ornithology. New York: Plenum Press. p. 159-187.
10. Cronquist A. 1978. Once again, what is a. species? In: Ramberger J.A., editor. Biosystematics in agriculture. Monclair (NJ): Allanheld & Osmun. p. 3-20.
11. Davis J.I., Nixon K.C. 1992. Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phyiogenetic species. Syst. Biol. 41:421-435.
12. Dayrat B. 2005. Advantages of naming species under the PhyloCode: an example of how a new species of Discodorididae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euthyneura, Nudibranchia, Doridina) may be named. Marine Biol. Res. 1:216-232.
13. Dayrat B., Cantino P.D., Clarke J. A., de Queiroz K. 2008. Species names in the PhyloCode: the approach adopted by the International Society for Phyiogenetic Nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 57:507-514.
14. Dayrat B., Gosliner T.M. 2005. Species names and metaphyly: a case study in Discodorididae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euthyneura, Nudibranchia, Doridina). Zool. Scr. 34:199-224. (Pubitemid 40335835)
15. de Queiroz K. 1997. The Linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on. the problem of nomenclature. Aliso. 15:125-144.
16. de Queiroz K. 1998. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: a conceptual, unification and terminological recommendations. In: Howard. D.J., Berlocher S.H., editors. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 57-75.
17. de Queiroz K. 2005. Different species problems and their resolution. Bioessays. 27:1263-1269. (Pubitemid 43076169)
18. de Queiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 56:879-886.
19. de Queiroz K., Donoghue M.J. 1988. Phyiogenetic systematic and the species problem. Ciadistics. 4:317-338.
20. de Queiroz K., Gauthier J. 1990. Phytogeny as a central principle in taxonomy-phyiogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39:307-322.
21. de Queiroz K., Gauthier J. 1992. Phyiogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:449-480.
22. Ereshefsky M. 1992. Eliminative pluralism. Philos. Sci. 59:671-690.
23. Ereshefsky M. 2009. Darwin's solution to the species problem. Synthese, doi: 10.1007/S11229-009-9538-9544
24. Farris J. 1982. The logical basis of phyiogenetic analysis. In: Platnick N., Funk V., editors. Advances in ciadistics: proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 7-36.
25. Fisher K.M., Wall D.P., Yip K.L., Mishler B.D. 2007. Phytogeny of the Calymperaceae with a rank-free systematic treatment. Bryologist. 110:46-73. (Pubitemid 46493539)
26. Hennig W. 1966. Phyiogenetic systematies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
27. Hey J. 2006. On the failure of modern species concepts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:447-450.
28. Lee M., Wolsan M. 2002. Integration, individuality and species concepts. Biol. Philos. 17:651-660.
29. Lee M.S. 2003. Species concepts and species reality: salvaging a Linnaean rank. J. Evol. Biol. 16:179-188.
30. Mallet J. 2008. Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 363:2971-2986.
31. Mayr E. 1.969. Principles of systematic zoology. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
32. Mishler B.D. 1999. Getting rid of species? In: Wilson R., editor. Species: new interdisciplinary essays. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p. 307-315.
33. Mishler B.D., Brandon R.N. 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phyiogenetic species concept. Biol. Philos. 2:397-414.
34. Mishler B.D., Donoghue M.J. 1982. Species concepts: a. case for pluralism. Syst. Zool. 31:491-503.
35. Nixon K.C., Wheeler Q.D. 1990. An amplification of the phyiogenetic species concept. Ciadistics. 6:211-223.
36. Penev L., Erwin T., Thompson, Christian F., Sues H.-D., Engel M.S., Agosti D., Pyle R., Ivie M., Assmann T., Henry T., Miller J., Ananjeva N.B., Casale A., Lourenço W., Golovatch S., Fagerholm H.-R, Taiti S., Alonso-Zarazaga M., van Nieukerken E. 2008. ZooKeys, unlocking Earth's incredible biodiversity and building a sustainable bridge into the public domain: From, "print-based" to "web-based" taxonomy, systematic and natural, history. ZooKeys. 1:1-7.
37. Pigliucci M. 2003. Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-) solution of the species problem? Bioessays. 25:596-602.
38. Pleijel F., Rouse G.W. 2000. Least-inclusive taxonomie unit: a new taxonomie concept for biology. Proc. Roy. Soc. London. B. 267: 627-630.
39. Ridley M. 1989. The cladistic solution to the species problem. Biol. Philos. 4:1-16.
40. Simpson G.G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. New York: Columbia. University Press.
41. Sneath P.H.A. 1976. Phenetic taxonomy at the species level and above. Taxon. 25:437-450.
42. Temp'leton A.R. 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Otte D., Endler J., editors. Speciation and its consequences. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. p. 3-27.
43. Van Valen L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon. 25:233-239.
44. Wiley E. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27:17-26.
45. Wolsan M. 2007. Naming species in phyiogenetic nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 56:1011-1021.