The addiction Stroop task: Examining the fast and slow effects of smoking and marijuana-related cues

Journal of Psychopharmacology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 510-519

  Cane, J E ^a   Sharma, D ^a   Albery, I P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Bias; Emotion; Marijuana; Smoking; Stroop

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CANNABIS SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SMOKING CESSATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROOP TASK; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARIJUANA ABUSE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67449119703     PISSN: 02698811     EISSN: 14617285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269881108091253     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Albery I., Sharma D., Niazi A., Moss AC., (2006) Theoretical perspectives and approaches. In: M Munafo., I Albery., (eds). Cognition & Addiction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-29.
2. Amos A., Wiltshire S., Bostock Y., Haw S., McNeill A., (2004) You can't go without a fag ■. you need it for your hash' a qualitative exploration of smoking, cannabis and young people. Addiction 99: 77-81. (Pubitemid 38142225)
3. Baayen RH., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L., (1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [Distributor].
4. Baker TB., Piper ME., McCarthy DE., Majeskie MR., Fiore MC., (2004) Addiction motivation reformulated: an affected processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychol Rev 111: 33-51. (Pubitemid 38157073)
5. Baron RM., Kenny DA., (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51: 1173-1182.
6. Boyer M., Dickerson M., (2003) Attentional bias and addictive behaviour: automaticity in a gambling-specific modified stroop task. Addiction 98: 61-70. (Pubitemid 36044337)
7. Cox WM., Fadardi JS., Pothos EM., (2006) The addiction-stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bull 132: 443-476. E-Prime version 1.1 (Psychology Software Tools, Inc.; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). (Pubitemid 43848891)
8. Field M., (2005) Cannabis dependence and attentional bias for cannabis-related words. Behav Pharmacol 16: 473-476. (Pubitemid 41404820)
9. Gross J., Stitzer ML., (1989) Nicotine replacement: ten-week effects on tobacco withdrawal symptoms. Psychopharmacology 98: 334-341. (Pubitemid 19162421)
10. Heatherton TF., Kozlowski LT., Frecker RC., Fagerstrom KO., (1991) The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict 86: 1119-1127.
11. Hughes J., Hatsukami D., Pickens R., Krahn D., Malin S., Luknic A., (1984) Effect of nicotine on the tobacco withdrawal syndrome. Psychopharmacology 83: 82-87. (Pubitemid 14141493)
12. Johnsen BH., Thayer JF., Laberg JC., Asbjornsen AE., (1997) Attentional bias in active smokers, abstinent smokers, and nonsmokers. Addict Behav 22: 813-817. (Pubitemid 27512002)
13. Klein AA., (2007) Suppression-induced hyperaccessibility of thoughts in abstinent alcoholics: a preliminary investigation. Behav Res Ther 45: 169-177. (Pubitemid 44647991)
14. Ku?era H., Francis WN., (1967) Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
15. MacKinnon DP., Warsi G., Dwyer JH., (1995) A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behav Res 30: 41 - 62.
16. McKenna FP., Sharma D., (2004) Reversing the emotional stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20: 382-392. (Pubitemid 38317882)
17. Munafo M., Mogg K., Roberts S., Bradley BP., Murphy M., (2003) Selective processing of smoking-related cues in current smokers, ex-smokers, and never-smokers on the modified Stroop paradigm. J Psychopharmacol 17: 311-317.
18. Parrot AC., (1994) Individual differences in stress and arousal during cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology 115: 389-396.
19. Phaf RH., Kan KJ., (2007) The automaticity of the emotional stroop: a meta-analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 38: 184 - 199. (Pubitemid 46466720)
20. Sharma D., Albery IP., Cook C., (2001) Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers. Addiction 96: 285-295. (Pubitemid 32154490)
21. Speilberger CD., Gorsuch RL., Lushene R., Vagg P., Jacobs GA., (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.
22. http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2000/rp00-074.pdf
23. Waters AJ., Sayette MA., Franken IHA., Schwartz JE., (2005) Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional stroop task. Behav Res Ther 43: 715-732. (Pubitemid 40693697)
24. Waters AJ., Sayette MA., Wertz J., (2003) Carry-over effects can modulate emotional stroop effects. Cogn Emot 17: 501 - 509. (Pubitemid 36519230)
25. Waters AJ., Shiffman S., Sayette MA., Paty JA., Gwaltney CJ., Balabanis MH., (2003) Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychol 22: 378-387. (Pubitemid 36944576)
26. Wyble B., Sharma D., Bowman H., (in press) Strategic Regulation of Cognitive Control by Emotional Salience, A Neural Network Model. Cognition & Emotion.