Combination of vibroacoustic stimulation and acute variables of mFBP as a simple assessment method of low-risk fetuses

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 152-156

  Petrovic, Oleg ^a   Finderle, Aleks ^a   Prodan, Mirko ^a   Skunca, Elvira ^b   Prpic, Igor ^a   Zaputovic, Sanja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RIJEKA   (Croatia)

^b Primary Health Care Center of Rijeka ^*  (Croatia)

Author keywords

Antenatal assessment; Fetal biophysical activities; Real time ultrasound; Vibroacoustic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE; FETUS; FETUS BREATHING; FETUS MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; VIBRATION SENSE; VIBROACOUSTIC STIMULATION; BREATHING MECHANICS; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; VIBRATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; FETAL MOVEMENT; FETUS; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; VIBRATION;

EID: 67449107080     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767050802616960     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hueston WJ. Techniques for antepartum fetal surveillance. Am Fam Phys 1991;44:893-904.
2. Kontopoulos EV, Vintzileos AM. Condition-specific antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1546-1551.
3. Vintzileos AM. Antenatal assessment for the detection of fetal asphyxia: an evidence-based approach using indicationspecific testing. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;900:137-150.
4. Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:787-795.
5. Manning FA, Bondaji N, Harman CR, Casiro O, Menticoglou S, Morrison I, Berk DJ. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring. VIII. The incidence of cerebral palsy in tested and untested perinates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:696-703.
6. Petrović O, Frković A, Rukavina B. Efficacy of the fetal biophysical profile and its individual components in predicting poor perinatal outcome. Acta Fac Med Fluminensis 1993;18:99-102.
7. Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Ingardia CJ, Nochimson DJ. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:271-278.
8. Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile: a critical appraisal. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002;45:975-985.
9. Vintzileos AM, CampbellWA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ. The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:527-533.
10. Habek D, Jugović D, Hodek B, Herman R, Matičević A, Habek JČ , Pisl Z, Salihagić A. Fetal biophysical profile and cerebro-umbilical ratio in assessment of brain damage in growth restricted fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;114:29-34.
11. Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, Harman CR, Chamberlain PF. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:709-712.
12. Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1672-1676.
13. Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK, Dorchester W. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:231-234.
14. Ott WJ,Mora G, Arias F, Sunderji S, Sheldon G. Comparison of the modified fetal biophysical profile to a "new" biophysical profile incorporating the middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery velocity flow systolic/diastolic ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:1346-1353.
15. Ou XD, Liu XX, Liang RX. The application of modified fetal biophysical profile scoring for prenatal monitoring. Chung Hua Fu Chan Ko Tsa Chih 1994;29:213-216.
16. Petrović O. Modified fetal biophysical profile. Gynaecol Perinatol 1993;3:161-164.
17. Olesen AG, Svare JA. Decreased fetal movements: background, assessment, and clinical management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:818-826.
18. Pillai M, James D. The importance of the behavioural state in biophysical assessment of the term human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:1130-1134.
19. Petrović O, Frković A, Matejcić N. Fetal biophysical profile and vibratory acoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1995;50:11-15.
20. Petrović O, Š kunca E, Matejčić N. A simplified fetal biophysical profile. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1998;61:9-14.
21. DiPietro JA. Neurobehavioral assessment before birth. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005;11:4-13.
22. Gingras JL, O'Donnell KJ. State control in the substanceexposed fetus. I. The fetal neurobehavioral profile: an assessment of fetal state, arousal, and regulation competency. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;846:262-276.
23. Groome LJ, Watson JE. Fetal behavioural states. J Maternal Fetal Invest 1992;2:183-194.
24. Mulder EJH, Boersma M, Meeuse M, van der Wal M, van de Weerd E, Visser GHA. Patterns of breathing movements in the near-term human fetus: relationship to behavioural states. Early Hum Dev 1994;36:127-135.
25. Almli CR, Ball RH, Wheeler ME. Human fetal and neonatal movement patterns: gender differences and fetal-to-neonatal continuity. Dev Psychobiol 2001;38:252-273.
26. Devoe LD, Youssef AA, Castillo RA, Croom CS. Fetal biophysical activities in third-trimester pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:298-305.
27. DiPietro JA, Hodgson DM, Costigan KA, Hilton SC, Johnson TR. Fetal neurobehavioral development. Child Dev 1996;67:2553-2567.
28. Mulder EJH, Morssink LP, Van der Schee T, Visser GHA. Acute maternal alcohol consumption disrupts behavioral state organization in the near-term fetus. Pediatr Res 1998;44:774-779.
29. Rotmensch S, Celentano C, Liberati M, Sadan O, Glezerman M. The effect of antenatal steroid administration on the fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:847-851.
30. Gagnon R, Hunse C, Carmichael L, Fellows F, Patrick J. Effects of vibratory acoustic stimulation on human fetal breathing and gross fetal body movements near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:1227-1230.
31. Inglis SR, Druzin ML, Wagner WE, Kogut E. The use of vibroacoustic stimulation during the abnormal or equivocal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:371-374.
32. Prodan M, Petrović O, Frković A, Rukavina B. Effect of external vibratory acoustic stimulation on fetal heart activity and movements. Gynaecol Perinatol 1992;1:33-35.
33. van Heteren CF, Boekkooi PF, Jongsma HW, Nijhuis JG. Responses to vibroacoustic stimulation in a fetus with an encephalocele compared to responses of normal fetuses. J Perinat Med 2000;28:306-308.
34. SarinogluC,Dell J,MercerBM, SibaiBM. Fetal startle response observed under ultrasonography: a good predictor of a reassuring biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:599-602.
35. Kurjak A, Azumendi G, Veček N, Kupešić S, Solak M, Varga D, Chervenak F. Fetal hand movements and facial expression in normal pregnancy studied by four-dimensional ultrasonograpy. J Perinat Med 2003;31:496-508.
36. Kurjak A, Stanojević M, Andonotopo W, Salihagić- Kadić A, Carrera JM, Azumendi G. Behavioral pattern continuity from prenatal to postnatal life - a study by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonograpy. J Perinat Med 2004;32:346-353.
37. Kurjak A, Stanojević M, Azumendi G, Carrera JM. The potential of four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonograpy in the assessment of fetal awareness. J Perinat Med 2005;33:46-53.