Views on technology among people in need of health care at home

International Journal of Circumpolar Health

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 158-169

  Wälivaara, Britt Marie ^a   Andersson, Staffan ^a   Axelsson, Karin ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Experiences; Homecare; Nursing; Qualitative research; Technology; Views on technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 67449104740     PISSN: 12399744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3402/ijch.v68i2.18326     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Demiris G. The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2006;62(2):178-188.
2. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8 Suppl 1:1-30.
3. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature. CMAJ 2001;165(6):765-771.
4. Magnusson L, Hanson E. Supporting frail older people and their family carers at home using information and communication technology: cost analysis. J Adv Nurs 2005;51(6):645-657.
5. Magnusson L, Hansson E, Borg M. A literature review study of information and communication technology as a support for frail older people living at home and their family carers. Technol Disabil 2004; 16 (4):223-235.
6. Koch S. Home telehealth-current state and future trends. Int J Med Inform 2006;75(8):565-576.
7. Shepperd S, Iliffe S. Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care. The Cochrane Database Syst Rev Issue 3 Art No: CD000356 DOI: 101002/14651858CD 000356pub2. 2005. 1-80
8. Roback K, Herzog A. Home informatics in health-care: assessment guidelines to keep up quality of care and avoid adverse effects. Technol Health Care 2003;11(3):195-206.
9. Parker Oliver DR, Demiris G. An assessment of the readiness of hospice organizations to accept technological innovation. J Telemed Telecare 2004;10(3): 170-174.
10. Nilsson C, Öhman M, Söderberg S. Information and communication technology in supporting people with serious chronic illness living at home-an intervention study. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12(4):198-202.
11. Levy S, Jack N, Bradley D, Morison M, Swanston M. Perspectives on telecare: the client view. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9(3):156-160.
12. Collins K, Nicolson P, Bowns I. Patient satisfaction in telemedicine. Health Informatics J 2000;6(2):81-85.
13. Magnusson L, Hanson EJ. Ethical issues arising from a research, technology and development project to support frail older people and their family carers at home. Health Soc Care Community 2003;11(5):431-439.
14. Sävenstedt S, Sandman PO, Zingmark K. The duality in using information and communication technology in elder care. J Adv Nurs 2006;56(1):17-25.
15. Berg BL. Qualitative research methodes for the social science. 6th Ed. Boston: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon; 2006. 384 pp.
16. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000;23(4):334-340.
17. Williams TL, May CR, Esmail A. Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. Telemed J E Health 2001;7(4):293-316.
18. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320 (7248):1517-1520.
19. Barnard A, Sandelowski M. Technology and humane nursing care: (ir)reconcilable or invented difference? J Adv Nurs 2001;34(3):367-375.
20. Barnard A. A critical review of the belief that technology is a neutral object and nurses are its master. J Adv Nurs 1997;26(1):126-131.
21. Collste G. The internet doctor and medical ethics. Ethical implications of the introduction of the Internet into medical encounters. Med Health Care Philos 2002;5(2):121-125.
22. Bauer K A. Home-based telemedicine: a survey of ethical issues. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2001;10:137-146.