Users' experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 172-182

  Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth Mary ^a   Sguin, Christiane ^b   Schramm, David ^a   Chnier, Jose ^b   Armstrong, Shelly ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adults; Bimodal hearing; Binaural hearing; Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; User's perspectives

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSIC; NOISE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT DURATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENT; HEARING; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SCINTISCANNING; SOUND DETECTION; STATISTICS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COHORT STUDIES; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOUND LOCALIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67449100567     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020802572619     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Armstrong, M., Pegg, P., James, C. Blamey, P. 1997. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol, 18(Suppl.), S140-141.
2. Balfour, P.B. Hawkins, D.B. 1992. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli. Ear Hear, 13, 331-339
3. Blamey, P., Dooley, G.J. Parisi, E.S. 2000. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing. Ear Hear, 21, 6-17.
4. Ching, T.Y., Hill, M., Brew, J., Incerti, P., Priolo, S., et al. 2005. The effect of auditory experience on speech perception, localization, and functional performance of children who use a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol, 44, 677-690
5. Ching, T.Y., Incerti, P. Hill, M. 2004. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear, 25, 9-21.
6. Ching, T.Y., Incerti, P., Hill, M. vanWanrooy, E. 2006. An overview of binaural advantages for children and adults who use binaural/ bimodal hearing devices. Audiol Neurotol, 11, 6-11.
7. Cornelisse, R.E., Seewald, R.C. Jamieson, D.G. 1995. The input/ output (i/o)formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 1854-1864
8. Cowan R. Chin-Lenn J. 2004. Pattern and prevalence of hearing aid use post-implantation in adult cochlear implant users. Aust N Z J Audiol, (Suppl.), 48.
9. Dillon, H. 1999. NAL-NL1: A new prescriptive fitting procedure for non-linear hearing aids. Hear J, 52, 10-16.
10. Gomaa, N.A., Rubinstein, J.T., Lowder, M.W., Tyler, R.S. Gantz, B.J. 2003. Residual speech perception and cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults. Ear Hear, 24, 539-544
11. Hardie, N.A. Shepherd, R.K. 1999. Sensorineural hearing loss during development: Morphological and physiological response of the cochlear and auditory brainstem. Hear Res, 128, 147-165.
12. Holt, R.F., Kirk, K.I., Eisenberg, L.S., Martinez, A.S. Campbell, W. 2005. Spoken word recognition development in children with residual hearing using cochlear implants and hearing aids in opposite ears. Ear Hea, 26, 82S-91S.
13. Kobler, S. Rosenhall, U. 2002. Horizontal localization and speech intelligibility with bilateral and unilateral hearing aid amplification. Int J Audiol, 41, 395-400.
14. Mencher, G.T. Davis, A. 2006. Bilateral or unilateral amplification: Is there a difference? A brief tutorial. Int J Audiol, 45, 3-11.
15. Mok, M., Grayden, D., Dowell, R.C. Lawrence, D. 2006. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 49, 338-351
16. Naidoo, S.V. Hawkins, D.B. 1997. Monaural/binaural p: Effect of hearing aid circuit on speech intelligibility and sound quality. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 188-202.
17. NIH Consensus Development Program. 1995. Cochlear implants in adults and children. NIH Consensus Statement Online. Retrieved February 28, 2007 from: http//www:consensus.nih.gov/1995/1995CochlearImplants100html.htm.
18. Noble, W. 2006. Bilateral hearing aids: A review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting. Int J Audiol, 45, 63-71.
19. Parkinson, A.J., Arcaroli, J., Staller, S.J., Arndt, P.L., Cosgriff, A., et al. 2002. The Nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: Adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear, 23(Suppl.), 41S-48S.
20. Perreau, A.E., Tyler, R.S., Witt, S. Dunn, C. 2007. Selection strategies for binaural and monaural cochlear implantation. Am J Audiol, 16, 85-93.
21. Rubinstein, J.T., Parkinson, W.S., Tyler, R.S. Gantz, B.J. 1999. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: Effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol, 20, 445-452
22. Shepherd, R.K. Hardie, N.A. 2001. Deafness-induced changes in the auditory pathway: Implications for cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol, 6, 305-318.
23. Syms, C.A. Wickesberg, J. 2002. Concurrent use of cochlear implants and hearing aids. In T. Kubo, Y. Takahashi T. Iwaki (eds.) Cochlear Implants: An Update. The Hague: Kubler Publications, pp. 535-539
24. Tyler, R.S., Parkinson, A.J., Wilson, B.S., Witt, S., Preece, J.P., et al. 2002. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization. Ear Hear, 23, 98-105.