Voting technology, political institutions, legal institutions and civil society: A study of the hypothesis of cultural lag in reverse

History and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 165-183

  Evan, William M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

2000 Presidential Election; Butterfly Ballots; Ogburn s Theory of Cultural Lag; Pregnant Chads; Reverse Theory of Cultural Lag; Voting Technology Systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349287904     PISSN: 07341512     EISSN: 14772620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0734151042000240809     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bannet, J, Price, DW, Rudys, A, Singer, J, and Wallach, DS. (2004). ‘Hack-a-Vote: Security Issues with Electronic Voting Systems.’. IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine, 2 (no. 1): 32–37.
2. Brown, RD, Jackson, RA, and Wright, GC. (September 1999). ‘Registration, Turnout, and State Party Systems.’. Political Research Quarterly, 52 (no. 3): 463–79.
3. Carter Graydon, ‘Rob the Vote!’ Vanity Fair (April 2004) 82
4. Erikson, R, McIver, J, and Wright, G. (September 1989). ‘Political Parties, Public opinion, and State Policy in the United States.’. American Political Science Review, 83 (no. 3): 729–50.
5. Etzioni, Amitai. (1972). ‘Minerva: An Electronic Town Hall.’. Policy Sciences, 3: 457–74.
6. Evan William M, ‘Time for a High-Tech Democracy.’ The Philadelphia Inquirer 30 June 1987 13-A
7. Goth, Greg. (2004). ‘E-Voting Security: The Electoral Dialectic Gets Hot.’. IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine, 2 (no. 1): 14–17.
8. st Century Renton, WA: Talion Publishing 2004
9. Hill, K, and Leighley, J. (August 1996). ‘Political Parties and Class Mobilization in Contemporary United States Elections.’. American Journal of Political Science, 40 (no. 3): 787–804.
10. Jackman, Robert. (June 1987). ‘Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.’. American Political Science Review, 81 (no. 2): 405–24.
11. Jonietz Erika, ‘Valid Voting?’ Technology Review (February 2004) 74 76
12. Kahn Melvin A, Francis JMajors, The Winning Ticket: Daley, the Chicago Machine, and Illinois Politics New York: Praeger 1984
13. Tony, Kinder. (2002). ‘Vote Early, Vote Often? Tele-Democracy in European Cities.’. Public Administration, 80 (no. 3): 557–82.
14. Kohno T, Rubin AD, Stubblefield A, Wallach DS, ‘Analysis of an Electronic Voting System.’ IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2004 23 July 2003
15. Lichter, Rothman. (June 1987). ‘Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy.’. American Political Science Review, 81 (no. 2): 383–404.
16. Mercuri, Rebecca. (Oct. 2002). ‘A Better Ballot Box?–New electronic voting systems pose risk as well as solutions.’. Spectrum, IEEE, 39 (no.10): 46–50.
17. Merton Robert K, Social Theory and Social Structure New York The Free Press, 1959
18. Morell, M. (June 1999). ‘Citizens’ Evaluations of Participatory Democratic Procedures: Normative Theory Meets Empirical Science.’. Political Research Quarterly, 52 (no. 2): 293–322.
19. Ogburn Social Change New York: B. W. Huebsch Inc., 1922
20. Pye, Lucian W., and Sidney Verba, eds Political Culture and Political Development Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1965
21. Rakove Milton, Don’t Make No Waves, Don’t Back No Losers: An Insiders analysis of the Daley Machine Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 1975
22. Sclove Richard E, Democracy and Technology New York: The Guilford Press 1995
23. Shnayerson Michael, ‘Hack the Votes.’ Vanity Fair (2004) 158 80
24. Snider, James H. (Sep/Oct. 1994). ‘Democracy On-Line: Tomorrow’s Electronic Electorate.’. The Futurist, 28 (no. 5): 15–19.
25. Steffens Lincoln, The Autobiography of Lincoln Steffens New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company 1931
26. Tsagarousianou Roza, Damian Tambini, Cathy Bryan, Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities, and Civic Networks London: Routledge 1998
27. US Commission on Civil Rights, Office of Civil Rights Evaluation ‘Is America Ready to Vote?’ Election Readiness Briefing Paper (April 2004) 8 10