Untangling the web of e-Research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 246-260

  Meyer, Eric T ^a   Schroeder, Ralph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cyberinfrastructure; e Research; e Science; Sociology of knowledge; Sociology of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349279808     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ackland R., Fry J., and Schroeder R. Scoping the online visibility of e-Research by means of e-Research tools. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on e-Social Science, Ann Arbor, MI, October 7-9 (2007)
2. Atkinson, M. (2006). e-Science: Foundations for the European citizen: A keynote talk at GRID2006, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://www.nesc.ac.uk/talks/mpa/Grid2006BarcelonaKeynote20060919MalcolmAtkinsonV2.pdf.
3. Barjak, F., Wiegand, G., Lane, J., Kertcher, Z., Procter, R., Poschen, M., et al. (2007). Accelerating Transition to Virtual Research Organisation in Social Science (AVROSS): Final Report. Brussels: Information Society and Media Directorate General, Commission of the European Communities.
4. Beaulieu A., Scharnhorst A., and Wouters P. Not another case study: A middle-range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of e-science. Science, Technology and Human Values 32 6 (2007) 672-692
5. Borgman C.L. Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet (2007), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
6. Catton C., Sparks S., and Shotton D. The ImageStore ontology and the BioImage database: Semantic web tools for biological research images. Paper presented at the BioImage Informatics Conference, UC Santa Barbara (2006)
7. Chen C., Chen Y., Horowitz M., Hou H., Liu Z., and Pellegrino D. Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery. Journal of Informetrics 3 3 (2009) 191-209
8. Collins R. The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change (1998), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
9. David, P., & Spence, M. (2003). Towards institutional infrastructures for e-Science: The scope of the challenge. Oxford Internet Institute, Research Report No. 2 (Electronic Version). Oxford Internet Institute Research Reports from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/resources/publications/RR2.pdf.
10. de la Flor G., and Meyer E.T. Framing e-Research: Understanding e-Research as a computerization movement. Paper presented at the Oxford e-Research 08 Conference, Oxford, UK (2008)
11. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy 11 3 (1982) 147-162
12. Dutton, W. H., & Jeffreys, P. (Eds.), (2010). World wide research: reshaping the sciences and humanities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
13. In: Elliott M.S., and Kraemer K.L. (Eds). Computerization movements and technology diffusion (2008), Information Today, Inc., Medford, NJ
14. Freeman C. The economics of innovation (1984), Penguin, London
15. Freeman C., and Soete L. The economics of industrial innovation. 3rd ed. (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
16. Frenken K., Hardeman S., and Hoekman J. Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics 3 3 (2009) 222-232
17. Frickel S., and Gross N. A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review 70 2 (2005) 204-232
18. Fry, J., & Schroeder, R. (2010). e-Research and the changing disciplinary landscape. In W. H. Dutton, & P. Jeffreys (Eds.), World wide research: reshaping the sciences and humanities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Fuchs S. Against essentialism: A theory of culture and society (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Gentzsch W. National grid initiatives: Lessons learned and recommendations (Keynote speech). Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 4-6 (2006)
21. Ginsparg, P. (1996). Winners and losers in the global research village (Invited contribution for Conference held at UNESCO HQ, Paris, February 19-23, 1996, during session "Scientist's view of electronic publishing and issues raised", February 21, 1996). Retrieved June 17, 2001, from http://arxiv.org/blurb/pg96unesco.html.
22. Griffiths, G. (2004). The value of structure in searching scientific literature (Scopus white paper series, number two). Retrieved February 17, 2009, from http://www.info.scopus.com/docs/wp2_structure_search.pdf.
23. Gunnarsdottir K. Scientific journal publications: On the role of electronic preprint exchange in the distribution of scientific literature. Social Studies of Science 35 4 (2005) 549-579
24. In: Hackett E.J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., and Wajcman J. (Eds). The handbook of science and technology studies. 3rd ed. (2008), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Hacking I. Representing and intervening (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. Hess D. Science studies: An advanced introduction (1997), New York University Press, New York
27. Hey T., and Trefethen A. The data deluge: An e-Science perspective. In: Berman F., Fox G., and Hey T. (Eds). Grid computing: Making the global infrastructure a reality (2003), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ 809-824
28. Hughes T.P. Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880-1930 (1983), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
29. Hughes T.P. Technological momentum. In: Marx L., and Smith M.R. (Eds). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 101-113
30. Jacso P. Google scholar revisited. Online Information Review 32 1 (2008) 102-114
31. Jankowski, N. (Ed.). (2009). e-Research: Transformations in scholarly practice. London: Routledge.
32. Kling R. The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 38 1 (2004) 591-631
33. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions (1962), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
34. Lambiotte R., and Panzarasa P. Communities, knowledge creation and information diffusion. Journal of Informetrics 3 3 (2009) 180-190
35. Lucio-Arias D., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of exchanges and references among scientific texts, and the autopoiesis of discursive knowledge. Journal of Informetrics 3 3 (2009) 261-271
36. Magee B. Popper (1973), William Collins Sons & Co., Ltd., Glasgow
37. Masterman M. The nature of a paradigm. In: Lakatos I., and Musgrave A. (Eds). Criticism and the growth of knowledge (1970), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 59-90
38. Meho L.I., and Rogers Y. Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology 59 11 (2008) 1711-1726
39. Meho L.I., and Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 13 (2007) 2105-2125
40. Meyer, E. T. (2009). Moving from small science to big science: Social and organizational impediments to large scale data sharing. In N. Jankowski (Ed.), e-Research: Transformation in scholarly practice. New York: Routledge.
41. Nentwich M. Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet (2003), Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna
42. In: Olson G.M., Zimmerman A., and Bos N.D. (Eds). Scientific collaboration on the Internet (2008), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
43. Schroeder R. Rethinking science, technology, and social change (2007), Stanford University Press, Stanford
44. Schroeder R. e-Sciences as research technologies: Reconfiguring disciplines, globalizing knowledge. Social Science Information 47 2 (2008) 131-157
45. Shiffrin, R. M., & Börner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl. 1), 5183-5185. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/content/101/suppl.1/5183.full.pdf.html.
46. Skupin A. Discrete and continuous conceptualizations of science: Implications for knowledge domain visualization. Journal of Informetrics 3 3 (2009) 233-245
47. Thelwall M. Bibliometrics to webmetrics. Journal of Information Science 34 4 (2007) 1-18
48. Whitley R. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. 2nd ed. (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
49. Wuchty S., Jones B.F., and Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316 (2007) 1036