CT and endoscopic ultrasound in comparison to endoluminal MRI-Preliminary results in staging gastric carcinoma

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 336-341

  Heye, Tobias ^a   Kuntz, Christian ^b   Düx, Markus ^c   Encke, Jens ^a   Palmowski, Moritz ^a   Autschbach, Frank ^d   Volke, Frank ^e   Kauffmann, Guenter Werner ^a   Grenacher, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Hospital Wetzlar Braunfels   (Germany)

^c Nordwest Hospital   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^e FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING   (Germany)

Author keywords

CT; Endoluminal MRI; EUS; Gastric cancer; Staging

Indexed keywords

CT; ENDOLUMINAL MRI; EUS; GASTRIC CANCER; STAGING;

TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASONICS;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOLUMINAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; STOMACH ADENOCARCINOMA; STOMACH CARCINOMA; STOMACH LYMPHOMA;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 67349257531     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.037     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hohenberger P., and Gretschel S. Gastric cancer. Lancet 362 9380 (2003) 305-315
2. Kwee R.M., and Kwee T.C. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 25 15 (2007) 2107-2116
3. Bosing N., Schumacher B., Frieling T., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in routine clinical practice for staging adenocarcinomas of the stomach and distal esophagus. Chirurg 74 3 (2003) 214-221 [discussion 222-213]
4. Bentrem D., Gerdes H., Tang L., Brennan M., and Coit D. Clinical correlation of endoscopic ultrasonography with pathologic stage and outcome in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14 6 (2007) 1853-1859
5. Habermann C.R., Weiss F., Riecken R., et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230 2 (2004) 465-471
6. Chen C.Y., Hsu J.S., Wu D.C., et al. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT-correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology 242 2 (2007) 472-482
7. Yanai H., Noguchi T., Mizumachi S., et al. A blind comparison of the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in staging early gastric cancer. Gut 44 3 (1999) 361-365
8. Kienle P., Buhl K., Kuntz C., et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopy, endosonography and computed tomography for staging of tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Digestion 66 4 (2002) 230-236
9. Wakelin S.J., Deans C., Crofts T.J., et al. A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 41 2 (2002) 161-167
10. Grenacher L., Heye T., Kuntz C., et al. Experimental testing of a new coil design for endoluminal MRI applied to the pig stomach. Rofo 177 7 (2005) 986-991
11. Heye T., Kuntz C., Dux M., et al. New coil concept for endoluminal MR imaging: initial results in staging of gastric carcinoma in correlation with histopathology. Eur Radiol 16 11 (2006) 2401-2409
12. Sobin L.H., and Wittekind C. In: International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (Ed). TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. (2002), John Wiley & Sons, New York
13. Kim A.Y., Han J.K., Seong C.K., Kim T.K., and Choi B.I. MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: is it useful compared with spiral CT?. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24 3 (2000) 389-394
14. Sohn K.M., Lee J.M., Lee S.Y., et al. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 6 (2000) 1551-1557
15. Siewert R.J., Feith M., Werner M., and Stein H.J. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 232 3 (2000) 353-361
16. Meining A., Dittler H.J., Wolf A., et al. You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging. Gut 50 5 (2002) 599-603
17. Minoli G. Endoscopic MRI: preliminary results of a new technique for visualization and staging of gastrointestinal tumours. Gastrointest Endosc 44 5 (1996) 639-640
18. Stoker J., and Rociu E. Endoluminal MR imaging of anorectal diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging 9 5 (1999) 631-634
19. Inui K., Nakazawa S., Yoshino J., et al. Endoscopic MRI: preliminary results of a new technique for visualization and staging of gastrointestinal tumors. Endoscopy 27 7 (1995) 480-485
20. Kulling D., Bohning D.E., Kay C.L., et al. Histological correlates to pig gastrointestinal wall layers imaged in vitro with the magnetic resonance endoscope. Gastroenterology 112 5 (1997) 1568-1574