Camelis: A logical information system to organise and browse a collection of documents

International Journal of General Systems

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 379-403

  Ferré, Sébastien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

Annotation; Browsing; Document collection; Formal concept analysis; Information retrieval; Logical information systems

Indexed keywords

AUDIO FILES; AUTOMATIC ANNOTATION; BROWSING; COLLECTION OF DOCUMENTS; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; DOCUMENT COLLECTION; EXISTING SYSTEMS; FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS; LOGICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NAVIGATION STRUCTURES;

CAMERAS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FORMAL LOGIC; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NAVIGATION; RIGID STRUCTURES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 67349256675     PISSN: 03081079     EISSN: 15635104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081070902857886     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Allard, P. and Ferré, S., 2008. Dynamic taxonomies for the semantic Web. In: G. Sacco, ed. International workshop on dynamic taxonomies and faceted search (FIND). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 382-386.
2. Amato, G. and Meghini, C., 2008. Faceted content-based image retrieval. In: G. Sacco, ed. DEXA workshop on dynamic taxonomies and faceted search (FIND). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 402-406.
3. Bedel, O., et al., 2008. GEOLIS: a logical information system for geographical data. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 17 (3-4), 371-390.
4. Carpineto, C. and Romano, G., 1996. A lattice conceptual clustering system and its application to browsing retrieval. Machine learning, 24 (2), 95-122.
5. Cole, R., Eklund, P. and Stumme, G., 2003. Document retrieval for email search and discovery using formal concept analysis. Journal of applied artificial intelligence, 17 (3), 257-280.
6. Datta, R., Li, J. and Wang, J.Z., 2005. Content-based image retrieval: approaches and trends of the new age. In: H. Zhang, J. Smith and Q. Tian, eds. International workshop on multimedia information retrieval. New York: ACM, 253-262.
7. Donini, F.M., et al., 1997. The complexity of concept languages. Information and computation, 134 (1), 1-58.
8. Ducrou, J. and Eklund, P., 2008. An intelligent user interface for browsing and search MPEG-7 images using concept lattices. International journal of foundations of computer science, World Scientific 19 (2), 359-381.
9. Ducrou, J., Vormbrock, B. and Eklund, P.W., 2006. FCA-based browsing and searching of a collection of images. In: H. Schärfe, P. Hitzler and P. Øhrstrøm, eds. International conference on conceptual structures. LNCS 4068. Berlin: Springer, 203-214.
10. Ferré, S. and Ridoux, O., 2000. A logical generalization of formal concept analysis. In: G. Mineau and B. Ganter, eds. International conference on conceptual structures. LNCS 1867. Berlin: Springer, 371-384.
11. Ferré, S. and Ridoux, O., 2002. A framework for developing embeddable customized logics. In: A. Pettorossi, ed. International workshop on logic-based program synthesis and transformation. LNCS 2372. Berlin: Springer, 191-215.
12. Ferré, S. and Ridoux, O., 2004. An introduction to logical information systems. Information processing and management, 40 (3), 383-419.
13. Ferré, S. and Ridoux, O., 2006. Logic functors: a toolbox of components for building customized and embeddable logics, Research Report RR-5871, INRIA, 103.
14. Ganter, B. and Wille, R., 1999. Formal concept analysis - mathematical foundations. Berlin: Springer, 252-260.
15. Gifford, D.K., et al., 1991. Semantic file systems. ACM SIGOPS, 16-25.
16. Godin, R., Missaoui, R. and April, A., 1993. Experimental comparison of navigation in a Galois lattice with conventional information retrieval methods. International journal of man-machine studies, 38 (5), 747-767.
17. Hyvönen, E., Styrman, A. and Saarela, S., 2002. Ontology-based image retrieval. In: E. Hyvönen and M. Klemettinen, eds. Towards the semantic web and web services. Helsinki: XML Finland Association, 15-27.
18. Kuznetsov, S. and Objedkov, S., 2001. Comparing performance of algorithms for generating concept lattice. In: E. Mephu Nguifo, ed. ICCS-2001 International workshop on concept lattices-based theory, methods and tools for knowledge discovery in databases CRIL - IUT de Lens. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
19. Lambek, J., 2006. Pregroups and natural language processing. The mathematical intelligencer, 28 (2), 41-48.
20. Lindig, C., 1995. Concept-based component retrieval. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 257-263.
21. Martinez, J. and Loisant, E., 2002. Browsing image databases with Galois' lattices. New York: ACM, 791-795.
22. Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J. and Kerr, B., 2006. Dogear: social bookmarking in the enterprise. In: R.E. Grinter, et al., ed. Conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI). New York: ACM, 111-120.
23. Padioleau, Y. and Ridoux, O., 2003. A logic file system. USENIX, 99-112.
24. Stumme, G., et al., 2002. Computing iceberg concept lattices with Titanic. Data knowledge engineering, 42 (2), 189-222.
25. Tobies, S., 2000. The complexity of reasoning with cardinality restrictions and nominals in expressive description logics. Journal of artificial intelligence research (JAIR), 12, 199-217.
26. Zhou, D.X., et al., 2008. Conversation pivots and double pivots. New York: ACM, 959-968.