Carotid Stenting Using Tapered and Nontapered Stents: Associated Neurological Complications and Restenosis Rates

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 439-445

  Brown, Katherine E ^a   Usman, Asad ^a   Kibbe, Melina R ^a   Morasch, Mark D ^a   Matsumura, Jon S ^a   Pearce, William H ^a   Amaranto, Daniel J ^a   Eskandari, Mark K ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN EMBOLISM; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; OCCLUSIVE CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RESTENOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STROKE; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALLOYS; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; CAROTID STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISCHEMIC ATTACK, TRANSIENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67349254113     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bosiers M., de Donato G., Deloose K., et al. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33 (2007) 135-142
2. Hart J.P., Peeters P., Verbist J., Deloose K., and Bosiers M. Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting?. J Vasc Surg 44 (2006) 725-730
3. Ischinger T.A. Carotid stenting: which stent for which lesion?. J Interv Cardiol 14 (2001) 617-623
4. Lal B.K., Hobson II R.W., Goldstein J., et al. In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance. J Vasc Surg 38 (2003) 1162-1169
5. Skelly C.L., Gallagher K., Fairman R.M., et al. Risk factors for restenosis after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 44 (2006) 1010-1015
6. Eskandari M.K., Longo G.M., Matsumura J.S., et al. Carotid stenting done exclusively by vascular surgeons: first 175 cases. Ann Surg 242 (2005) 431-438
7. Peterson B.G., Longo G.M., Kibbe M.R., et al. Duplex ultrasound remains a reliable test even after carotid stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 19 (2005) 793-797
8. Barnett H.J., Taylor D.W., Eliasziw M., et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339 (1998) 1415-1425
9. Eskandari M.K., Brown K.E., Kibbe M.R., Morasch M.D., Matsumura J.S., and Pearce W.H. Restenosis after carotid stent placement in patients with prior neck irradiation or endarterectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18 (2007) 1368-1374
10. Adel J.G., Morasch M.D., and Eskandari M.K. An uncommon cause for carotid artery stenosis after carotid stenting. Ann Vasc Surg (2008) 13 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.017
11. Groschel K., Riecker A., Schulz J.B., Ernemann U., and Kastrup A. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 36 (2005) 367-373
12. Setacci C., Pula G., Baldi I., et al. Determinants of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty: a case-control study. J Endovasc Ther 10 (2003) 1031-1038
13. Zhou W., Lin P.H., Bush R.L., et al. Management of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 43 (2006) 305-312
14. Lal B.K., Kaperonis E.A., Cuadra S., Kapadia I., and Hobson II R.W. Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: classification and implications for long-term outcome. J Vasc Surg 46 (2007) 833-840
15. Schwartz R.S., Huber K.C., Murphy J.G., et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (1992) 267-274
16. Hoffmann R., Mintz G.S., Mehran R., et al. Tissue proliferation within and surrounding Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on the aggressiveness of stent implantation technique. Am J Cardiol 83 (1999) 1170-1174
17. Sullivan T.M., Ainsworth S.D., Langan E.M., et al. Effect of endovascular stent strut geometry on vascular injury, myointimal hyperplasia, and restenosis. J Vasc Surg 36 (2002) 143-149
18. Ballyk P.D. Intramural stress increases exponentially with stent diameter: a stress threshold for neointimal hyperplasia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 (2006) 1139-1145
19. Kirsch E.C., Khangure M.S., Morling P., York T.J., and McAuliffe W. Oversizing of self-expanding stents: influence on the development of neointimal hyperplasia of the carotid artery in a canine model. A.J.N.R. Am J Neuroradiol 23 (2002) 121-127
20. Piamsomboon C., Roubin G.S., Liu M.W., et al. Relationship between oversizing of self-expanding stents and late loss index in carotid stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 45 (1998) 139-143
21. Clark D.J., Lessio S., O'Donoghue M., Tsalamandris C., Schainfeld R., and Rosenfield K. Mechanisms and predictors of carotid artery stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 2390-2396
22. Willfort-Ehringer A., Ahmadi R., Gruber D., et al. Arterial remodeling and hemodynamics in carotid stents: a prospective duplex ultrasound study over 2 years. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 728-734
23. Puato M., Piergentili C., Zanardo M., et al. Vascular remodeling after carotid artery stenting. Angiology 58 (2007) 565-571
24. Liu M.W., Roubin G.S., and King III S.B. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Potential biologic determinants and role of intimal hyperplasia. Circulation 79 (1989) 1374-1387