The response of rice straw varieties to urea treatment

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 151, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 291-298

  Vadiveloo, J ^a   Fadel, J G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Leaf blade; Leaf sheath; Stem; Urea treatment; Whole rice straw

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349245518     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abou-El-Enin O.H., Fadel J.G., and Mackill D.J. Differences in chemical composition and fibre digestion of straw with and without anhydrous ammonia from 53 rice varieties. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 79 (1999) 129-136
2. Agbagla-Dohnani A., Noziere P., Clement G., and Doreau M. In sacco degradability, chemical and morphological composition of 15 varieties of European rice straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 94 (2001) 15-27
3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis. 14th edition (1984), AOAC, Washington, DC
4. Bae H.D., McAllister T.A., Kokko E.G., Leggett F.L., Yanke L.J., Jakober K.D., Ha J.K., Shin H.T., and Cheng K.J. Effect of silica on the colonisatioon of rice straw by ruminal bacteria. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 65 (1997) 165-181
5. Balgees A., Elmnan A., Fadel Elseed A.M.A., and Salih A.M. Effect of ammonia and urea treatments on the chemical composition and rumen degradability of bagasse. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 3 (2007) 1359-1362
6. Bainton S.J., Plumb V.E., Juliano B.O., Perez C.M., Roxas D.B., Khush G.S., de Jesus J.C., and Gomez K.A. Variation in the nutritional value of rice straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 34 (1991) 261-277
7. Bughrara S.S., and Sleper D.A. Digestion of several temperate forage species by a prepared cellulase solution. Agron J. 78 (1986) 94-98
8. Chaudhry A.S. Chemical and biological procedures to upgrade cereal straws for ruminants. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 68 (1998) 319-331
9. Colucci P.E., Falk D., Macleod G.K., and Grieve D.G. In situ organic matter degradability of untreated and urea-treated varieties of spring barley and oat straws, and of untrreated varieties of winter wheat straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 37 (1992) 73-84
10. Juliano B.O. Rice hulls and rice straw. In: Juliano B.O. (Ed). Rice Chemistry and Technology (1985), American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc., MN, USA 689-755
11. Mgheni D.M., Kimambo A.E., Sundstøl F., and Madsen J. Influence of urea treatment or supplementation on degradation, intake and growth performance of goats fed rice straw diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 44 (1993) 209-220
12. Nakashima Y., and Ørskov E.R. Rumen degradation of straw 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanical fractions. Anim. Prod. 50 (1990) 309-317
13. Phang O.C., and Vadiveloo J. Effects of varieties, botanical fractions and supplements of palm oil byproducts on the feeding value of rice straw in goats. Small Rumin. Res. 6 (1992) 295-301
14. Prasad R.D.D., Reddy M.R., and Reddy G.V.N. Effect of feeding baled and stacked urea-treated rice straw on the performance of crossbred cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 73 (1998) 347-352
15. Rafiq M., Dixon R.M., Hosking B.J., and Egan A.R. Leaf content of straw diets influences supplementation responses by sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 100 (2002) 93-106
16. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide. Statistics, Version 6 (1987), SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC
17. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide. Statistics, Version 8.2 (1999), SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC
18. Shen H.Sh., Ni D.B., and Sundstøl F. Studies on untreated and urea-treated rice straw from three cultivation seasons. 1. Physical and chemical measurements in straw and straw fractions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 73 (1998) 243-261
19. Shen H.Sh., Sundstøl F., and Ni D.B. Studies on untreated and urea-treated rice straw from three cultivation seasons. 2. Evaluation of straw quality through in vitro gas production and in sacco degradation measurements. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 74 (1998) 193-212
20. Shen H.Sh., Sundstøl F., Eng E.R., and Eik L.O. Studies on untreated and urea-treated rice straw from three cultivation seasons. 3. Histological investigations by light and scanning electron microscopy. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 80 (1999) 151-159
21. Tuen A.A., Dahan M.M., Young B.A., and Vijchulata P. Intake and digestion of urea-treated, urea-supplemented and untreated rice straw by goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 32 (1991) 333-340
22. Vadiveloo J. Factors contributing to varietal differences in the nutritive value of rice straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 54 (1995) 45-53
23. Vadiveloo J. Nutritional properties of the leaf and stem of rice straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 83 (2000) 57-65
24. Vadiveloo J. The effect of agronomic improvement and urea treatment on the nutritional value of Malaysian rice straw varieties. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 108 (2003) 133-146
25. Vadiveloo J. The degradability of straw from single and double-crop varieties. Trop. Sci. 43 (2003) 184-191
26. Vadiveloo J., and Phang O.C. Differences in the nutritive value of two rice straw varieties as influenced by season and location. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 61 (1996) 247-258
27. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., and Lewis B.A. Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74 (1991) 3583-3597
28. Williams B.A., Chuzaemi S., Soebarinoto, van Bruchem J., Boer H., and Tamminga S. A comparison of ten rice straw varieties grown at two different altitudes during a wet and a dry season, using the in vitro cumulative gas production technique. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57 (1996) 183-194