Comparison of Body Composition by Bioelectrical Impedance and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Overweight/Obese Postmenopausal Women

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 238-244

  Fakhrawi, Dina H ^a   Beeson, Lawrence ^b   Libanati, Cesar ^c   Feleke, Daniel ^b   Kim, Hannah ^b   Quansah, Alfred ^b   Darnell, Allan ^b   Lammi Keefe, Carol J ^d   Cordero MacIntyre, Zaida ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA); body composition; dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY FAT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; OBESITY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; BODY COMPOSITION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; OVERWEIGHT; POSTMENOPAUSE;

EID: 67349242997     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Fulcher G.R., Farrer M., Walker M., et al. A comparison of measurements of lean body mass derived by bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thickness and total body potassium. A study in obese and non-obese normal subjects. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 51 (1991) 245-253
2. Gray D.S., Bray G.A., Gemayel N., and Kaplan K. Effect of obesity on bioelectrical impedance. Am J Clin Nutr 50 (1989) 255-260
3. Baumgartner R.N., Heymsfield S.B., Lichtman S., et al. Body composition in elderly population: effect of criterion estimates on predictive equations. Am J Clin Nutr 53 (1991) 1345-1353
4. Houtkooper L.B., Lohman T.G., Going S.B., and Howell W.H. Why bioelectrical impedance analysis should be used for estimating adiposity. Am J Clin Nutr 64 (1996) 436s-438s
5. Roubenoff R., Kehayias J.J., Dawson-Hughes B., and Heymsfield S.B. Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in body-composition studies: not yet a "gold standard". Am J Clin Nutr 58 (1993) 589-591
6. Bolanowski M., and Nilsson B.E. Assessment of human body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Med Sci Monit 7 (2001) 1029-1033
7. Salamone L.M., Fuerst T., Visser M., et al. Measurement of fat mass using DEXA: a validation study in elderly adults. J Appl Physiol 89 (2000) 345-352
8. Sun G., French C., Martin G., et al. Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population. Am J Clin Nutr 81 (2005) 74-78
9. Neovius M., Hemmingsson E., Freyschuss B., and Udden J. Bioelectrical impedance underestimates total and truncal fatness in abdominally obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14 (2006) 1731-1738
10. Newton R.J., Alfonso A., York-Crowe E., et al. Comparison of body composition methods in obese African-American women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14 (2006) 415-422
11. Hosking J., Metcalf B., Jeffery A.N., et al. Validation of foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of body composition in young children: the EarlyBird cohort. Br J Nutr 96 (2006) 1163-1168
12. Andreoli A., Melchiorri G., De Lorenzo A., et al. Bioelectrical impedance measures in different position and vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). J Sports Med Phys Fitness 42 (2002) 186-189
13. Eisenkolbl J., Kartasurya M., and Widhalm K. Underestimation of percentage fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method in obese children. Eur J Clin Nutr 55 (2001) 423-429
14. Ravaglia G., Forti P., Maioli F., et al. Measurement of body fat in healthy elderly men: a comparison of methods. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 54 (1999) M70-M76
15. Brummer R., Lonn L., Bengtsson B.A., et al. Comparison of different body composition models in acromegaly. Growth Regul 6 (1996) 191-200
16. Kitano T., Kitano N., Inomoto T., and Futatsuka M. Evaluation of body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, skinfold thickness and bioelectrical impedance analysis in Japanese female college students. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 47 (2001) 122-125
17. Erselcan T., Candan F., Saruhan S., and Ayca T. Comparison of body composition analysis methods in clinical routine. Ann Nutr Metab 44 (2000) 243-248
18. Wattanapenpaiboon N., Lukito W., Strauss B.J., et al. Agreement of skinfold measurement and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in estimating total body fat in Anglo-Celtic Australians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22 (1998) 854-860
19. Stewart S.P., Bramley P.N., Heighton R., et al. Estimation of body composition from bioelectrical impedance of body segments: comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Nutr 69 (1993) 645-655
20. Jebb S., Siervo M., Murgatroyd P.R., et al. Validity of the leg-to-leg bioimpedance to estimate changes in body fat during weight loss and regain in overweight women: a comparison with multi-compartment models. Int J Obes (Lond) 5 (2007) 756-762
21. Pietrobelli A., Rubiano F., St-Onge M.P., and Heymsfield S.B. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 58 (2004) 1479-1484
22. Lazzer S., Boirie Y., Meyer M., and Vermorel M. Which alternative method to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in overweight and obese adolescents?. Arch Pediatr 12 (2005) 1094-1101
23. Lukaski H.C. Assessing regional muscle mass with segmental measurements of bioelectrical impedance in obese women during weight loss. Ann N Y Acad Sci 904 (2000) 154-158
24. Cordero-MacIntyre Z.R., Peters W., Libanati C.R., et al. Reproducibility of DXA in obese women. J Clin Densitom 5 (2002) 35-44
25. Lintsi M., Kaarma H., and Kull I. Comparison of hand-to-hand bioimpedance and anthropometry equations versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat percentage in 17-18-year-old conscripts. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 24 (2004) 80-85
26. Lohman T.G., Roche A.F., and Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual (1991), Human Kinectics, Champaign, IL
27. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinocal measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
28. Lohman T.G. Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry. In: Roche A.R., Heymsfield S.B., and Lohman T.G. (Eds). Human Body Composition (1996), Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL
29. Wellens R., Chumlea W.C., Guo S., et al. Body composition in white adults by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, densitometry and total body water. Am J Clin Nutr 59 (1994) 547-555
30. Johansson A., Forslund A., Sjodin A., et al. Determination of body composition-a comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and hydrodensitometry. Am J Clin Nutr 57 (1993) 323-326
31. Aloia J., Vaswani A., Ma R., and Flaster E. Comparative study of body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Nucl Med 36 (1995) 1392-1397
32. Haarbo J., Gotfredsen A., Hassager C., and Christiansen C. Validation of body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clin Physiol 11 (1991) 331-341
33. Pateyjohns I.R., Brinkworth G.D., Buckley J.D., et al. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14 (2006) 2064-2070