Self-diagnosis of smart structures based on dynamical properties

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1830-1845

  Fritzen, C P ^a   Kraemer, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Damage diagnosis; Dynamic testing; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE VIBRATION DAMPING; AMBIENT VIBRATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL CAPABILITIES; DAMAGE DIAGNOSIS; DIRECT USE; DYNAMIC BEHAVIORS; DYNAMIC TESTING; DYNAMICAL PROPERTIES; EARLY WARNINGS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FREQUENCY DOMAINS; OFF-SHORE WIND ENERGIES; REMAINING LIVES; SELF-DIAGNOSIS; SMART STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL CHANGES;

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; CONCRETE BRIDGES; DAMAGE DETECTION; DC MOTORS; HEALTH; INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES; INVERSE PROBLEMS; SENSOR NETWORKS; TESTING; WIND POWER;

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EID: 67349241636     PISSN: 08883270     EISSN: 10961216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Schmidt H.J., Telgkamp J., and Schmidt-Brandecker B. Application of structural health monitoring to improve efficiency of aircraft structure. Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2004 (2004), DEStech Publications, Lancaster, PA, USA 11-18
2. A. Rytter, Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures, Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark, 1993.
3. H. Sohn, C.F. Farrar, F.M. Hemez, D.D. Shunk, D.W. Stinemates, B.R. Nadler, J.J. Czarnecki, A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001, Report LA-13976-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2004.
4. Worden K., and Dulieu-Barton J.M. An overview of intelligent fault detection in systems and structures. Structural Health Monitoring 3 1 (2004) 85-98
5. Inman D.J., Farrar C.R., Lopes Jr. V., and Steffen Jr. V. Damage Prognosis (2005), Wiley, Chichester, UK
6. C.R. Farrar, H. Sohn, F.M. Hemez, M.C. Anderson, M.T. Bement, P.J. Corwell, S.W. Doebling, J.F. Schultze, N. Lieven, A.N. Robertson, Damage prognosis: current status and future needs, Report LA-14051-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2003.
7. In: Balageas D., Fritzen C.-P., and Güemes A. (Eds). Structural Health Monitoring (2005), Hermes Science Publishing, London, UK
8. Adams D.E. Health Monitoring of Structural Materials and Components (2005), Wiley, Chichester, UK
9. S.W. Doebling, C.R. Farrar, M.B. Prime, D.W. Shevitz, Damage identification and health monitoring of structural systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review, Report LA-12767-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, USA, 1996.
10. Chang F.-K. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (2003), DEStech Publishers, Lancaster, PA, USA
11. Boller C., and Staszewski W.J. Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (2004), DEStech Publishers, Lancaster, PA, USA
12. In: Staszewski W., Boller C., and Tomlinson G. (Eds). Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures-Smart Sensor Technologies and Signal Processing (2004), Wiley, Chichester
13. Natke H.G., and Cempel C. Model-Aided Diagnosis of Mechanical Systems (1997), Springer, Germany
14. Worden K., Farrar C.R., Manson G., and Park G. Fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Fourth International Workshop Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (2005), DEStech Publishers, Lancaster, PA, USA 26-41
15. Farrar C.R., and Worden K. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 365 (2007) 303-315
16. I. Müller, Schwingungsbasierte Schadensdiagnose delaminierter Verbundstrukturen, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Karlsruhe, 2005.
17. Seibold S., Fritzen C.-P., and Wagner D. Employing identification procedures for the detection of cracks in rotors. Modal Analysis 11 3,4 (1996) 204-215
18. Farrar C.R., and Lieven N. Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 365 (2007) 623-632
19. Vachtsevanos G., Lewis F.L., Roemer M., Hess A., and Wu B. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems (2006), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
20. Ostachowicz W., and Krawczuk M. On modelling of structural stiffness loss due to damage. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures: DAMAS2001, Key Engineering Materials vols. 204-205 (2001), Transtech Publishers, Switzerland 185-200
21. Natke H.G. Einführung in Theorie und Praxis der Zeitreihen- und Modalanalyse. third ed. (1992), Vieweg, Germany
22. Friswell M.I., and Mottershead J.E. Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
23. Sohn H., Farrar C.R., Hunter N.F., and Worden K. Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. Journal Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME 123 (2001) 706-711
24. Bishop C.M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
25. C.-P. Fritzen, G. Mengelkamp, A. Güemes, Elimination of temperature effects on damage detection within a smart structure concept, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, USA, 15-17 September 2003, pp. 1530-1538.
26. P. Kraemer, C.-P. Fritzen, Concept for structural damage identification of offshore wind energy plants, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, USA, 11-13 September 2007, pp. 1881-1888.
27. Sohn H., Worden K., and Farrar C.R. Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 13 (2002) 561-574
28. J. Kullaa, Damage detection under a varying environment using the missing data concept, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on SHM, Stanford University, USA, 12-14 September 2005, pp. 565-573.
29. J. Kullaa, Elimination of environmental influences from damage-sensitive features in a structural health monitoring system, in: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on SHM, Paris, 2002, pp. 742-749.
30. V. Lämsä, J. Kullaa, Nonlinear factor analysis in structural health monitoring to remove environmental effects, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, USA, 11-13 September, 2007, pp. 1092-1099.
31. Yan A.-M., Kerschen G., De Boe P., and Golinval J.-C. Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions-Part 2: local PCA for non-linear cases. Mechanical Systems and Processing 19 (2005) 865-880
32. Sohn H. Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 365 (2007) 539-560
33. Papadimitriou C., Beck J.L., and Au S.-K. Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating. Journal of Vibration and Control 6 (2000) 781-800
34. R.T. Schulte, K. Bohle, C.-P. Fritzen, G. Schuhmacher, Optimal sensor placement for damage identification-an efficient forward-backward selection algorithm, in: Proceedings of the Third EWSHM, Granada, Spain, 2006, pp. 1151-1159.
35. K. Bohle, Sensitivitätsbasierte Methoden zur modellgestützten Schadendiagnose mit Modaldaten, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Siegen, 2005.
36. I. Trendafilova, W. Heylen, Measurement point selection in damage detection using the average mutual information, in: European COST F3 Conference on System Identification & SHM, Madrid, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 147-156.
37. Dunia R., Qin S.J., Edgar T.F., and McAvoy T.J. Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis. AIChE Journal 42 10 (1996) 2797-2812
38. Kerschen G., De Boe P., Golinval J.-C., and Worden K. Sensor validation for on-line vibration monitoring. In: Boller C., and Staszewski W.J. (Eds). Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2004 (2004), DEStech Publications, Munich, Germany 819-827
39. D.L. Mattern, L.C. Jaw, T.-H. Guo, R. Graham, W. McCoy, Using neural network for sensor validation, in: 34th Joint Propulsion Conference Cosponsored by AIAA, ASME, SAE and ASEE, Cleveland, OH, USA (July 12-15, 1998).
40. K. Worden, Sensor validation and correction using auto-associative neural networks and principal component analysis, in: Proceedings of the IMAC XXI, Orlando, USA, 2003.
41. J. Kullaa, Sensor fault identification and correction in structural health monitoring, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, USA, 2007, pp. 606-613.
42. Kraemer P., and Fritzen C.-P. Sensor fault identification using autoregressive models and the mutual information concept, DAMAS 2007, Torino, Italy. Key Engineering Materials 347 (2007) 387-392
43. Park G., Farrar C.R., Lanza di Scalea F., and Coccia S. Performance assessment and validation of piezoelectric active-sensors in structural health monitoring. Smart Materials and Structures 15 (2006) 1673-1683
44. B. Weber, P. Paultre, J. Proulx, Damage detection of aluminium truss using Tikhonov regularization, in: Proceedings of the XXIV, IMAC, January 30-February 2, 2006, St. Louis, MO, USA, on CD Rom, ISBN 0-912053-94-1.
45. Link M., Stöhr S., and Weiland M. Identification of structural property degradations by computational model updating. Key Engineering Materials 347 (2007) 19-34
46. Fritzen C.-P., Jennewein D., and Kiefer T. Damage detection based on model-updating methods. Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing 12 1 (1998) 163-186
47. Fritzen C.-P., and Bohle K. Parameter Selection Strategies in Model-Based Damage Detection, Structural Health Monitoring 2000 (1999), Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, PA, USA pp. 901-911
48. Ewins D.J. Modal Testing: Theory and Practice (2000), Research Study Press, UK
49. Heylen W., Lammens S., and Sas P. Modal Analysis Theory and Testing (1998), Kath. Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
50. Peeters B., and De Roeck G. Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 13 6 (1999) 855-878
51. Peeters B., and De Roeck G. Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 123 (2001) 659-667
52. Cawley P., and Adams R.D. The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies. Journal of Strain Analysis 14 (1979) 49-57
53. Zimmerman D.C., and Kaouk M. Structural damage detection using a minimum rank update theory. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 116 2 (1994) 222-231
54. D.C. Zimmerman, in: M.D. Gilchrist, J.M. Dulieu-Barton, K. Worden (Eds.), Looking into the Crystal Ball: The Continued Need for Multiple Viewpoints in Damage Detection, Damage Assessment of Structures, Trans Tech Publications, 1999, pp. 76-90.
55. N. Stubbs, J.-T. Kim, C.R. Farrar, Field verification of a nondestructive damage localization and severity estimation algorithm, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, 1995, pp. 210-218.
56. J. Maeck, Damage assessment of civil engineering structures by vibration monitoring, Ph.D. Dissertation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2003.
57. P. Ladeveze, M. Reynier, A localization method of stiffness errors for the adjustment of FE models, in: Proceedings of 12th ASME Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Montreal, Canada (ASME), 1989, pp. 355-361.
58. Fritzen C.-P., and Bohle K. Damage identification using a modal kinetic energy criterion and output-only modal data-application to the Z-24 bridge. Proceedings of the Second European Workshop Structural Health Monitoring, Munich, Germany (2004), DEStech Publishers, Lancaster, PA, USA 185-194
59. Oeljeklaus M. Projection methods within model updating. Inverse Problems in Engineering 8 (2000) 119-141
60. D. Otte, H. van der Auweraer, J. Leuridan, The use of multivariate correlation techniques for vibro-acoustic experimental data analysis, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Seminar on Modal Analysis, Course on Advanced Techniques in Applied Acoustics, KU Leuven, Belgium, 1992.
61. Johnson T.J., and Adams D.E. Transmissibility as a differential indicator of structural damage. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 124 (2002) 634-641
62. R.P.C. Sampaio, N.M.M. Maia, J.M.M. Silva, A.M.R. Ribeiro, On the use of transmissibility for damage detection and localization, in: Proceedings of the European Cost F3 Conference System Identification & Structure Health Monitoring, vol. 1, University of Madrid, Spain, 2000, pp. 363-376.
63. Hilson G., Worden K., and Manson G. Feature selection for a neural damage locator using a genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Paris, France (2004), DEStech Publishers, Lancaster, PA, USA 624-632
64. Park G., Sohn H., Farrar C.F., and Inman D.J. Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward. The Shock and Vibration Digest 35 6 (2003) 451-463
65. Giurgiutiu V., and Lyshewski S.E. Micromechatronics (2004), CRC Press, Boca Raton
66. Giurgiutiu V. Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors (2008), Elsevier, Amsterdam
67. Gertler J.J. Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems (1998), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, Basel, Hong Kong
68. Fassois S.D., and Sakellariou J.S. Time series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 365 (2007) 411-448
69. Basseville M., Abdelghani M., and Benveniste A. Subspace-based fault detection algorithms for vibration monitoring. Automatica 36 (2000) 101-109
70. Basseville M., Benveniste A., Goursat M., Hermans L., Mevel L., and van der Auweraer H. Output-only modal subspace-based structural identification: from theory to industrial testing practice. Journal of the Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 123 (2001) 668-676
71. C.-P. Fritzen, G. Mengelkamp, A. Güemes, A CFRP plate with piezo-electric actuators and sensors as self-diagnostic intelligent structure, in: Proceedings of the ISMA 2002, KU Leuven, Belgium, 2002, pp. 185-191.
72. C.-P. Fritzen, G. Mengelkamp, A. Güemes, Detection of small delaminations in a CFRP plate by vibration-based structural health monitoring, in: Proceedings of the 14th. International Conference on Composite Materials, San Diego, 2003, pp. 110-121.
73. Y. Aimin, J.-C. Golinval, F. Marin, Fault detection algorithm based on null-space analysis for on-line structural health monitoring, in: Proceedings of the 23th IMAC, January 31-February 2, Orlando, FL, Society for Experimental Mechanics, 2005 (published on CD-ROM).
74. Mehra R.K., and Peschon J. An innovations approach to fault detection and diagnosis in dynamic systems. Automatica 7 (1971) 637-640
75. Fritzen C.-P., Mengelkamp G., and Kalman A. Filter approach to the detection of structural damage. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (2003), DEStech Publishers, Lancaster, PA, USA 1275-1284
76. Maeck J., and De Roeck G. Description of Z24-benchmark. Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing 17 1 (2003) 127-132
77. Maeck J., Peeters B., and De Roeck G. Damage identification on the Z24-bridge using vibration monitoring analysis. Smart materials and structures. Smart Materials and Structures 10 3 (2001) 512-517
78. Maeck J., and De Roeck G. Damage assessment using vibration analysis on the Z24-bridge. Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing 17 1 (2003) 133-142
79. C.-P. Fritzen, P. Kraemer, K.J. Xing, Damage detection and localization using time domain residuals, in: World Forum on Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology, Chongqing & Nanjing, PR China, May 22-27, 2007 (published on CD-ROM).
80. R. Rohrmann, W. Ruecker, IMO-wind: an integrated monitoring system for offshore wind energy turbines, in: Proceedings of the Eurodyn 2005, September 2005, Paris, France.
81. Gasch R., and Twele J. Wind Power Plants, Solarpraxis Berlin (2002), James & James, London
82. C.-P. Fritzen, P. Kraemer, M. Klinkov, Structural health monitoring of offshore wind energy plants, in: Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Krakow, Poland, 2008, pp. 19-37.
83. P. Kraemer, C.-P. Fritzen, Damage identification of structural components of offshore wind energy plants, in: Proceedings of the DEWEK 2008, Bremen, Germany (published on CD-ROM).
84. M. Klinkov, C.-P. Fritzen, Online force reconstruction using robust observers, in: EWSHM'06 Proceeding, Spain, 5-7 July 2006, paper no. 76 on CD-ROM.
85. C.-P. Fritzen, M. Klinkov, Online wind load estimation for offshore wind energy plants, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, USA, 11-13 September, 2007, pp. 1905-1912.
86. M. Klinkov, C.-P. Fritzen, Online wind load estimation for offshore wind energy plants, in: Proceedings of the DEWEK 2008, Bremen, Germany (published on CD-ROM).