Context modeling and measuring for proactive resource recommendation in business collaboration

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-36

  Gong, Ruinan ^a,b   Ning, Ke ^b   Li, Qing ^a   O'Sullivan, David ^b   Chen, Yuliu ^a   Decker, Stefan ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Business collaboration; Context modeling; Context reasoning; Resource recommendation system

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS COLLABORATION; COLLABORATION SYSTEMS; CONTEXT MODELING; CONTEXT MODELS; CONTEXT REASONING; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; EXPERT KNOWLEDGE; EXTENDED ENTERPRISE; HUMAN RESOURCES; KNOWLEDGE RESOURCE; KNOWLEDGE WORKERS; RESOURCE RECOMMENDATION; RESOURCE RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM; WORKING EFFICIENCY;

ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 67349236704     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2008.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Akman V., and Surav M. Steps toward formalizing context. AI Magazine 17 (1996) 55-72
2. Beyer H., and Holtzblatt K. Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems (1998), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
3. Brézillon, P. (2002). Modeling and using context: Past, present and future. Paris: University Paris 6.
4. Brezillon, P. (2003). Using context for supporting users efficiently. In The 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
5. Brezillon P., and Abu-Hakima S. Using Knowledge in its context: Report on the IJCAI-93 workshop. AI magazine 16 1 (1995) 87-91
6. Dey A.K. Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications. College of computing (2000), Georgia Institute of Technology
7. Dey, A. K., & Abowd, G. D. (2000). Toward a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In CHI 2000 workshop on the what, who, where, when, why and how of context-awareness, 2000, Hague, Netherlands.
8. D'Souza M.E., and Greenstein J.S. Listening to users in a manufacturing organization: a context-based approach to the development of a computer-supported collaborative work system. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 32 4 (2003) 251-264
9. Forstadius, J., Lassila, O., & Seppänen, T. (2005). RDF-based model for context-aware reasoning in rich service environment. In The 3rd IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops, 2005, Hawaii.
10. Geyer W., Muller M.J., Moore M.T., Wilcox E., Cheng L.-T., Brownholtz B., et al. Activity explorer: Activity-centric collaboration from research to product. IBM Systems Journal 45 4 (2006) 713-738
11. Gould J.D., Boies S.J., and Lewis C. Making usable, useful productivity-enhancing computer applications. Communications of the ACM 34 1 (1991) 74-85
12. Gruber T.R. A translation approach to portable ontologies specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5 2 (1993) 199-220
13. Gu T., Pung H.K., and Zhang D.Q. A service-oriented middleware for building context-aware services. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 28 (2005) 1-18
14. Halaschek, C. (2004). A flexible approach for analyzing and ranking complex relationships on the Semantic Web. Computer Science Department, University of Georgia.
15. Horridge, M., Knublauch, H., Rector, A., Stevens, R., & Wroe, C. (2004). A practical guide to building OWL ontologies using the protege-OWL plugin and CO-ODE tools. The University Of Manchester.
16. Hughes J.A., Somerville I., Bentley R., and Randall D. Designing with ethnography: Making work visible. Interacting with Computers 5 2 (1993) 239-253
17. Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-1, 4-11.
18. Luther, M., Mrohs, B., Wagner, M., Steglich, S., & Kellerer, W. (2005). Situational reasoning - A practical OWL use case. In The 7th International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS 2005), Chengdu.
19. McCarthy, J. (1993). Notes on formalizing context. In The 13th international joint conference on artificial intelligence.
20. OWL. (2006). Available from http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL.
21. Protégé. (2007). Available from http://protege.stanford.edu.
22. RDF/XML Syntax Specification. (2004). Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar.
23. Rodriguez M.A., and Egenhofer M.J. Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15 2 (2003) 442-456
24. Salovaara, A., & Oulasvirta, A. (2004). Six modes of proactive resource management: A user-centric typology for proactive behaviors. In The third Nordic conference on human-computer interaction, 2004, Tampere, Finland.
25. Tennenhouse D. Proactive computing. Communications of the ACM 43 5 (2000) 43-50
26. Wang, X. H., Zhang, D. Q., Gu, T., & Pung, H. K. (2004). Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. In The second IEEE annual conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOMW' 04) 2004, Orlando, USA.