Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 279, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 881-890

  Noble, Meredith ^a   Bruening, Wendy ^a   Uhl, Stacey ^a   Schoelles, Karen ^a  

^a ECRI INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided detection (CAD); Incremental diagnoses; Mammography; Screening; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EMBASE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDLINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TUMOR BIOPSY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67349236223     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-008-0841-y     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. L Tabar B Vitak MF Yen HH Chen RA Smith SW Duffy 2004 Number needed to screen: lives saved over 20 years of follow-up in mammographic screening J Med Screen 11 3 126 129 10.1258/0969141041732175
2. D Laming R Warren 2000 Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms J Med Screen 7 1 24 30 10.1136/jms.7.1.24
3. J Dinnes S Moss J Melia R Blanks F Song J Kleijnen 2001 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review Breast 10 6 455 463 10.1054/brst.2001.0350
4. P Taylor HW Potts 2008 Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate Eur J Cancer 44 6 798 807 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016
5. NT Brewer T Salz SE Lillie 2007 Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms Ann Intern Med 146 7 502 510
6. P Whiting AW Rutjes JB Reitsma J Kleijnen 2003 The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 25 1 42
7. JP Higgins SG Thompson 2002 Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Stat Med 21 11 1539 1558 10.1002/sim.1186
8. JP Higgins SG Thompson JJ Deeks DG Altman 2003 Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 7414 557 560 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
9. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H (2005) Comprehensive meta-analysis. Version 2. Englewood (NJ): Biostat. Also available: http://www.meta-analysis.com/pages/about-us.html
10. J Zamora V Abraira A Muriel K Khan A Coomarasamy 2006 Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data BMC Med Res Methodol 6 31 10.1186/1471-2288-6-31
11. R DerSimonian N Laird 1986 Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 3 177 188 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
12. I Olkin 1999 Diagnostic statistical procedures in medical meta-analysis Stat Med 18 17-18 2331 2341 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/ 18<2331::AID-SIM259>3.0.CO;2-L
13. Taylor P (2008) (Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, Highgate Hill). Personal communication, 1 p, 29 September 2008
14. D Gur JH Sumkin HE Rockette M Ganott C Hakim L Hardesty WR Poller R Shah L Wallace 2004 Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system J Natl Cancer Inst 96 3 185 190
15. TE Cupples JE Cunningham JC Reynolds 2005 Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 4 944 950 10.2214/AJR.04.1300
16. JC Dean CC Ilvento 2006 Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 1 20 28 10.2214/AJR.05.0111
17. FJ Gilbert SM Astley MG Gillan OF Agbaje MG Wallis J James CR Boggis SW Duffy 2008 The CADET II group. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography N Engl J Med 359 16 1675 1684 10.1056/NEJMoa0803545
18. JJ Fenton SH Taplin PA Carney L Abraham EA Sickles C D'Orsi EA Berns G Cutter RE Hendrick WE Barlow JG Elmore 2007 Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography N Engl J Med 356 14 1399 1409 10.1056/NEJMoa066099
19. M Gromet 2008 Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231, 221 mammograms AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 4 854 859 10.2214/AJR.07.2812
20. D Georgian-Smith RH Moore E Halpern ED Yeh EA Rafferty HA D'Alessandro M Staffa DA Hall KA McCarthy DB Kopans 2007 Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 5 1135 1141 10.2214/AJR.07.2393
21. JM Ko MJ Nicholas JB Mendel PJ Slanetz 2006 Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 6 1483 1491 10.2214/AJR.05.1582
22. MJ Morton DH Whaley KR Brandt KK Amrami 2006 Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection-prospective evaluation Radiology 239 2 375 383 10.1148/radiol.2392042121
23. RL Birdwell P Bandodkar DM Ikeda 2005 Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting Radiology 236 2 451 457 10.1148/radiol.2362040864
24. TW Freer MJ Ulissey 2001 Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12, 860 patients in a community breast center Radiology 220 3 781 786 10.1148/radiol.2203001282
25. K Armstrong E Moye S Williams JA Berlin EE Reynolds 2007 Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med 146 7 516 526
26. MA Ganott JH Sumkin JL King AH Klym VJ Catullo CS Cohen D Gur 2006 Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer Radiology 238 3 793 800 10.1148/radiol.2383050852