Research on quality performance conceptual design based on SPEA2+

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

Volumn 57, Issue 11-12, 2009, Pages 1943-1948

  Wei, Zhe ^a   Feng, Yixiong ^a   Tan, Jianrong ^a   Wu, Junhao ^b   Yang, Dandan ^c   Wang, Jinlong ^d  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b China Telecom   (China)

^c General Office   (China)

^d QINGDAO TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Conceptual design; Injection molding machine; Multi objective optimal; Product performance; SPEA2+

Indexed keywords

CONTROL POWER; DECISION MAKERS; INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE; INJECTION QUANTITIES; MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMAL; NSGA-II; OPTIMAL PROBLEMS; OPTIMUM SOLUTIONS; PARETO FRONTS; PARETO-OPTIMAL SETS; PERFORMANCE DESIGNS; PRODUCT PERFORMANCE; QUALITY PERFORMANCE; SPEA2+;

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; EXTRACTION; FUZZY SETS; MACHINE DESIGN; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PLASTIC MOLDS; WOOD PRODUCTS;

INJECTION MOLDING;

EID: 67349230600     PISSN: 08981221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Xie Y.B. Research of modern design theory and method. Mechanical Engineering Journal 40 (2004) 1-9
2. Branke J., Kauler T., and Schmeck H. Guidance in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Advances in Engineering Software 32 (2001) 499-507
3. Oliveira L.S., Sabourin R., Bortolozzi F., and Suen C.Y. Feature selection using multi-objective genetic algorithms for handwritten digit recognition. Pattern Recognition 1 (2002) 568-571
4. Xia W.J., and Wu Z.M. An effective hybrid optimization approach for multi-objective flexible job-shop scheduling problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering 48 (2005) 409-425
5. Cochran J.K., Horng S.M., and Fowler J.W. A multi-population genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective scheduling problems for parallel machines. Computers & Operations Research 30 (2003) 1087-1102
6. Tan K.C., Lee T.H., and Khor E.F. Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization: Performance assessments and comparisons. Artificial Intelligence Review 17 (2002) 1573-7462
7. Balke W.T., and Gvntzer U. Multi-objective query processing for database systems. Very Large Data Bases 30 (2004) 936-947
8. Scherer C.W. An efficient solution to multi-objective control problems with LMI objectives. Systems and Control Letters 40 (2000) 43-57
9. Erickson M., Mayer A., and Horn J. Multi-objective optimal design of groundwater remediation systems: Application of the niched Pareto genetic algorithm (NPGA). Advances in Water Resources 25 (2002) 51-65
10. Srinivas N., and Deb K. Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Evolutionary Computations 3 (1995) 221-248
11. Deb K., Pratap A., and Agarwal S. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6 (2002) 182-197
12. Sarkar D., and Modak J.M. Pareto-optimal solutions for multi-objective optimization of fed-batch bioreactors using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Science 60 (2005) 481-492
13. Mitra K., and Gopinath R. Multi-objective optimization of an industrial grinding operation using elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Science 59 (2004) 385-396
14. Milosevic B. Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for optimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 18 (2003) 69-75