A unified framework for analysis and comparison of randomized response surveys of binary characteristics

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 139, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2757-2766

  Nayak, Tapan K ^a   Adeshiyan, Samson A ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design unbiasedness; Fisher information; Respondents' protection; Sampling design; Variance estimator

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349221725     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson H. Estimation of a proportion through randomized response. Internat. Statist. Rev. 44 (1976) 213-217
2. Anderson H. Efficiency versus protection in a general randomized response model. Scand. J. Statist. 4 (1977) 11-19
3. Blackwell D. Comparison of experiments. Proceedings of Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (1951), University of California Press, Berkeley 93-102
4. Blackwell D. Equivalent comparison of experiments. Ann. Math. Statist. 24 (1953) 265-272
5. Chaudhuri A. Using randomized response from a complex survey to estimate a sensitive proportion in a dichotomous finite population. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 94 (2001) 37-42
6. Chaudhuri A. Christofides' randomized response technique in complex sample surveys. Metrika 60 (2004) 223-228
7. Chaudhuri A., and Mukerjee R. Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques (1988), Marcel Dekker, New York
8. Christofides T.C. A generalized randomized response technique. Metrika 57 (2003) 195-200
9. Christofides T.C. Randomized response in stratified sampling. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 128 (2005) 303-310
10. Chua T.C., and Tsui A.K. Procuring honest responses indirectly. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 90 (2000) 107-116
11. Fligner M.A., Policello G.E., and Singh J. A comparison of two randomized response survey methods with consideration for the level of respondent protection. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 6 (1977) 1511-1524
12. Franklin L.A. Randomized response sampling from dichotomous populations with continuous randomization. Surv. Methodology 15 (1989) 225-235
13. Greenberg B.G., Abul-Ela A.-L.A., Simmons W.R., and Horvitz D.G. The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64 (1969) 520-539
14. Gouweleeuw J.M., Kooiman P., Willenborg L.C.R.J., and De Wolf P.P. Post randomisation for statistical disclosure control: theory and implementation. J. Official Statist. 14 (1998) 463-478
15. Kim J.-M., and Warde W.D. A stratified Warner's randomized response model. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 120 (2004) 55-165
16. Kuk A.Y.C. Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika 77 (1990) 436-438
17. Lanke J. On the degree of protection in randomized interviews. Internat. Statist. Rev. 44 (1976) 197-203
18. Leysieffer R.W., and Warner S.L. Respondent jeopardy and optimal designs in randomized response models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71 (1976) 649-656
19. Mangat N.S. An improved randomized response strategy. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 56 (1994) 93-95
20. Mangat N.S., and Singh R. An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77 (1990) 439-442
21. Nayak T.K. On randomized response surveys for estimating a proportion. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 23 (1994) 3303-3321
22. Padmawar V.R., and Vijayan K. Randomized response revisited. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 90 (2000) 293-304
23. Van den Hout A., and Van der Heijden P.G.M. Randomized response, statistical disclosure control and misclassification: a review. Internat. Statist. Rev. 70 (2002) 269-288
24. Warner S.L. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 60 (1965) 63-69