Buildings and affordances

Design Computing and Cognition '06

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 345-364

  Koutamanis, Alexander ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

AFFORDANCES; ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDINGS; BUILDING ELEMENT;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 67349221537     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Biederman, I: 1987, Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding, Psychological Review 94(2): 115-147.
2. Brown, DC and Blessing, L: 2005, The relationship between function and affordance, Proceedings of IDETC/CIE: ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, California.
3. Evans, GW and Mitchell McCoy, J: 1998, When buildings don't work: The role of architecture in human health, Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 85-94. (Pubitemid 128348544)
4. Gibson, EJ and Walk, RD: 1960, The "Visual Cliff", Scientific American 202: 64-71.
5. Gibson, JJ: 1977, The theory of affordances, in RE Shaw and J Bransford (eds), Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 67-82.
6. Gibson, JJ: 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts.
7. Heft, H: 1997, The relevance of Gibson's ecological approach to perception for environmentbehavior studies, in GT Moore and RW Marans (eds), Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design, Vol. 4, Plenum, New York, pp. 72-108.
8. Hoffman, DD and Richards, W: 1985, Parts of recognition, Cognition 18: 65-96.
9. Ingold, T: 1992, Culture and the perception of the environment, in E Croll and D Parkin (eds), Bush Base: Forest Farm - Culture, Environment and Development, Routledge, London, pp. 39-56.
10. Kim, HS, Park, KH and Kim, M: 1987, Shape decomposition by colinearity, Pattern Recognition Letters 6: 335-340.
11. Koutamanis, A: 1997, Multilevel representation of architectural designs, in R Coyne, M Ramscar, J Lee and K Zreik (eds), Design and the Net, Europia Productions, Paris, pp. 74-84.
12. Koutamanis, A, van Leusen, M and Mitossi, V: 2001, Route analysis in complex buildings, in B de Vries, J van Leeuwen and H Achten (eds), Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2001, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 711-724.
13. Marr, D: 1982, Computer Vision, WH Freeman, San Francisco.
14. McGrenere, J and Ho, W: 2000, Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept, in Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, Montreal, pp. 179-186.
15. Norman, D: 1988, The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
16. Norman, D: 2002, The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
17. Norman, DA: 1999, Affordance, conventions, and design, ACM Interactions 6(3): 38-43.
18. Oliver, M: 2005, The problem with affordance, E-Learning 12(4): 402-413.
19. Rosenfeld, A (ed): 1984, Multiresolution Image Processing and Analysis, Springer, Berlin.
20. Rosenfeld, A: 1990, Pyramid algorithms for efficient vision, in C Blakemore (ed), Vision: Coding and Efficiency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 423-430.
21. Tweed, C: 2001, Highlighting the affordances of designs, in B de Vries, J van Leeuwen and H Achten (eds), Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2001, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 681-696.