Part-based probabilistic point matching using equivalence constraints

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 969-976

  McNeill, Graham ^a   Vijayakumar, Sethu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRESPONDENCE ALGORITHM; EM ALGORITHMS; EQUIVALENCE CONSTRAINTS; MODEL PARAMETERS; POINT SET; POINT-MATCHING; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROCRUSTES ANALYSIS; REAL IMAGES; SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING; SHAPE MATCHING;

ALGORITHMS; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

IMAGE MATCHING;

EID: 67349221442     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. PAMI, 24:509-522, 2002.
2. H. Chui and A. Rangarajan. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Comp. Vis. and Image Understanding, 89:114-141, 2003.
3. Z. Tu and A.L. Yuille. Shape matching and recognition using generative models and informative features. In ECCV, 2004.
4. G. McNeill and S. Vijayakumar. A probabilistic approach to robust shape matching. In ICIP, 2006.
5. Noam Shental, Aharon Bar-Hillel, Tomer Hertz, and Daphna Weinshall. Computing Gaussian mixture models with EM using equivalence constraints. In NIPS. 2004.
6. Kaleem Siddiqi and Benjamin B. Kimia. Parts of visual form: Computational aspects. PAMI, 17(3):239-251, 1995.
7. M. Titsias. Unsupervised Learning of Multiple Objects in Images. PhD thesis, Univ. of Edinburgh, 2005.
8. B. Luo and E.R. Hancock. A unified framework for alignment and correspondence. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 92(26-55), 2003.
9. H. Ling and D.W. Jacobs. Using the inner-distance for classification of ariculated shapes. In CVPR, 2005.