Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

European Spine Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 696-703

  Gunzburg, Robert ^a,j   Szpalski, Marek ^b   Callary, Stuart A ^c   Colloca, Christopher J ^d   Kosmopoulos, Victor ^e,f   Harrison, Deed ^g,h   Moore, Robert J ⁱ  

^a Eeuwfeestkliniek   (Belgium)

^b IRIS   (Belgium)

^c ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e University of North Texas Health Science Center   (United States)

^f JOHN PETER SMITH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g CBP Non Profit Inc   (United States)

^h Private Practice   (United States)

ⁱ Adelaide Center for Spinal Research   (Australia)

^j Spine Surgery   (Belgium)

more..

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Interspinous implant; Kinematics; Lumbar spine; Spondylolisthesis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMPLANT; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAMB; LUMBAR SPINE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;

ANIMALS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SHEEP; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;

EID: 67349218412     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. SD Boden SW Wiesel 1990 Lumbosacral segmental motion in normal individuals. Have we been measuring instability properly? Spine 15 571 576 10.1097/00007632-199006000-00026
2. CM Bono AR Vaccaro 2007 Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine J Spinal Disord Tech 20 255 261 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180331352
3. B Cakir M Richter W Kafer M Wieser W Puhl R Schmidt 2006 Evaluation of lumbar spine motion with dynamic X-ray-a reliability analysis Spine 31 1258 1264 10.1097/01.brs.0000217763.80593.50
4. SD Christie JK Song RG Fessler 2005 Dynamic interspinous process technology Spine 30 S73 S78 10.1097/01.brs.0000174532.58468.6c
5. LY Dai YK Xu WM Zhang ZH Zhou 1989 The effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the capacity of the spinal canal. An experimental study Spine 14 523 525 10.1097/00007632-198905000-00009
6. Y Floman MA Millgram Y Smorgick N Rand E Ashkenazi 2007 Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision J Spinal Disord Tech 20 337 341 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318030a81d
7. S Freudiger G Dubois M Lorrain 1999 Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119 127 132 10.1007/s004020050375
8. A Fujiwara K Tamai HS An T Kurihashi TH Lim H Yoshida K Saotome 2000 The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine J Spinal Disord 13 444 450 10.1097/00002517-200010000-00013
9. H Graf 1992 Lumbar instability: surgical treatment without fusion Rachis 412 123 137
10. MP Grevitt AD Gardner J Spilsbury IM Shackleford R Baskerville LM Pursell A Hassaan RC Mulholland 1995 The Graf stabilisation system: early results in 50 patients Eur Spine J 4 169 175 10.1007/BF00298241
11. D Grob A Benini A Junge AF Mannion 2005 Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years Spine 30 324 331 10.1097/01.brs.0000152584.46266.25
12. T Humke D Grob W Grauer A Sandler J Dvorak 1996 Foraminal changes with distraction and compression of the L4/5 and L5/S1 segments Eur Spine J 5 183 186 10.1007/BF00395511
13. A Kettler J Drumm F Heuer K Haeussler C Mack L Claes HJ Wilke 2008 Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 23 242 247 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.004
14. A Kettler L Liakos B Haegele HJ Wilke 2007 Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests? Eur Spine J 16 2186 2192 10.1007/s00586-007-0485-9
15. KA Kim M McDonald JH Pik P Khoueir MY Wang 2007 Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation Neurosurg Focus 22 E7 E9
16. DS Kong ES Kim W Eoh 2007 One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability J Korean Med Sci 22 330 335
17. CG Laudet JF Elberg D Robine 1993 Comportement biomécanique d'un ressort inter-apophysaire vertébral postérieur analyse expérimentale du comportement discal en compression et en flexion/extension Rachis 5 101 107
18. JC Leahy KJ Mathias A Heaton DE Shepherd DW Hukins WF Deans MW Brian D Wardlaw 2000 Design of spinous process hooks for flexible fixation of the lumbar spine Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 214 479 487 10.1243/0954411001535507
19. DA Levin JJ Hale JA Bendo 2007 Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65 29 36
20. DP Lindsey KE Swanson P Fuchs KY Hsu JF Zucherman SA Yerby 2003 The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine Spine 28 2192 2197 10.1097/01.BRS. 0000084877.88192.8E
21. M Mimura MM Panjabi TR Oxland JJ Crisco I Yamamoto A Vasavada 1994 Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine Spine 19 1371 1380
22. RJ Minns WK Walsh 1997 Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine Spine 22 1819 1825 10.1097/00007632-199708150-00004
23. A Nachemson 1985 Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain Int Orthop 9 1 10 10.1007/BF00267031
24. L Penning JT Wilmink 1987 Posture-dependent bilateral compression of L4 or L5 nerve roots in facet hypertrophy. A dynamic CT-myelographic study Spine 12 488 500 10.1097/00007632-198706000-00013
25. FM Phillips LI Voronov IN Gaitanis G Carandang RM Havey AG Patwardhan 2006 Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy Spine J 6 714 722 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.003
26. DK Resnick TF Choudhri AT Dailey MW Groff L Khoo PG Matz P Mummaneni WC Watters III J Wang BC Walters MN Hadley 2005 Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis J Neurosurg Spine 2 679 685
27. MC Rigby GP Selmon MA Foy AJ Fogg 2001 Graf ligament stabilisation: mid- to long-term follow-up Eur Spine J 10 234 236 10.1007/s005860100254
28. W Schmoelz JF Huber T Nydegger I Dipl L Claes HJ Wilke 2003 Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment J Spinal Disord Tech 16 418 423
29. J Senegas 2002 Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 S164 S169
30. M Siddiqui FW Smith D Wardlaw 2007 One-year results of X Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 32 1345 1348 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31805b7694
31. KP Singer SJ Edmondston RE Day WH Breidahl 1994 Computer-assisted curvature assessment and Cobb angle determination of the thoracic kyphosis. An in vivo and in vitro comparison Spine 19 1381 1384
32. Sterna J, Chopek L, Ciupik A, Dobkiewicz J, Pienazek J, Radek M, Szpalski M (2006) Evaluation of implantation procedure and research of influence of Inter-S dynamic tensioning stabilization system. In: XIII Meeting of the Neuroorthopedic Section of the Polish Society of Neurosurgery, Zakopane, April 27-29, 2006
33. TM Stoll G Dubois O Schwarzenbach 2002 The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 S170 S178
34. KE Swanson DP Lindsey KY Hsu JF Zucherman SA Yerby 2003 The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures Spine 28 26 32 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00008
35. M Szpalski F Michel JP Hayez 1996 Determination of trunk motion patterns associated with permanent or transient stenosis of the lumbar spine Eur Spine J 5 332 337 10.1007/BF00304349
36. KJ Tsai H Murakami GL Lowery WC Hutton 2006 A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine J Surg Orthop Adv 15 167 172
37. OJ Verhoof JL Bron FH Wapstra BJ Van Royen 2008 High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis Eur Spine J 17 188 192 10.1007/s00586-007-0492-x
38. JN Weinstein TD Tosteson JD Lurie AN Tosteson E Blood B Hanscom H Herkowitz F Cammisa T Albert SD Boden A Hilibrand H Goldberg S Berven H An 2008 Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis N Engl J Med 358 794 810 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136
39. CM Wiseman DP Lindsey AD Fredrick SA Yerby 2005 The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension Spine 30 903 907 10.1097/01.brs.0000158876.51771.f8
40. JF Zucherman KY Hsu CA Hartjen TF Mehalic DA Implicito MJ Martin DR Johnson GA Skidmore PP Vessa JW Dwyer ST Puccio JC Cauthen RM Ozuna 2005 A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results Spine 30 1351 1358 10.1097/01.brs. 0000166618.42749.d1