Equivalent constant rates for post-quake seismic decision making

Structural Safety

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 443-447

  Yeo, Gee Liek ^a   Cornell, C Allin ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aftershocks; Building tagging; Equivalent constant rates; Life safety considerations; Mainshocks

Indexed keywords

AFTERSHOCKS; BUILDING EVACUATIONS; CONVENTIONAL DESIGNS; DISCOUNT FACTORS; EQUIVALENT CONSTANT RATES; EXISTING BUILDINGS; GROUND MOTIONS; LIFE-SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS; MAINSHOCK; MAINSHOCKS; POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS; PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE; SAFETY PROBLEMS; SAFETY RISKS; TIME INTERVALS; TIME-VARYING;

BUILDING CODES; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; TIME VARYING SYSTEMS;

BUILDINGS;

EID: 67349214040     PISSN: 01674730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Reasenberg P.A., and Jones L.M. Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California. Science 243 (1989) 1173-1175
2. Reasenberg P.A., and Jones L.M. Earthquake aftershocks: update. Science 265 (1994) 1251-1252
3. USGS. Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002-2031. Open file report 03-214; 2003.
4. Leyendecker E.V., Hunt R.J., Frankel A.D., and Rukstales K.S. Development of maximum considered earthquake ground motion maps. Earthquake Spectra 1 16 (2000) 21-40
5. International Code Council. 2006 international building code; 2006.
6. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Guidelines for safety evaluation of platform conceptual design. Oslo, Norway; 1981.
7. Paté-Cornell M.E. Discounting in risk analysis: capital vs. human safety: structural technology and risk (1984), University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo
8. Luco N, Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, Canada; 2004.
9. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun C, Motahari M. Guidelines for seismic assessment of damaged buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, Canada; 2004.
10. Cornell C.A., Jalayer F., Hamburger R.O., and Foutch D.A. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 128 4 (2002) 526-533
11. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering. Technical report 2005/13, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER); 2005.
12. Yeo GL. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University; 2005.
13. Gallagher R, Reasenberg P, Poland C. Earthquake aftershocks - entering damaged buildings: ATC TechBrief 2. Applied Technology Council (ATC); 1999.
14. Paté M.E. Costs and benefits of seismic upgrading of some buildings in the Boston area. Earthquake Spectra 1 4 (1985) 721-740
15. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun C, Luco N, Motahari M. Advanced seismic assessment guidelines. Technical report 2004/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER); 2004.
16. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Building tagging criteria based on aftershock PSHA. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, Canada; 2004.
17. Federal Emergency Management Agency. HAZUS 99 technical manual; 1999.
18. Maffei JR, Mohr DS, Holmes WT. Test application of advanced seismic assessment guidelines for 3-story steel moment-frame: draft. Rutherford and Chekene: Oakland, California; 2002.