Usefulness of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Localization of Prostate Cancer

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 399-403

  Kajihara, Hiroo ^a   Hayashida, Yoshiko ^b   Murakami, Ryuji ^c   Katahira, Kazuhiro ^a   Nishimura, Ryuichi ^d   Hamada, Yasuyuki ^a   Kitani, Kousuke ^a   Kitaoka, Mitsuhiko ^a   Suzuki, Yasuko ^a   Kitajima, Mika ^c   Hirai, Toshinori ^c   Morishita, Shoji ^a   Awai, Kazuo ^c   Yamashita, Yasuyuki ^c  

^a KUMAMOTO CHUO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

^c KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d SAISEIKAI KUMAMOTO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

diffusion weighted imaging (DWI); dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL); interobserver difference; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

DETECTABILITY; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED IMAGING (DWI); DOMINANT INTRAPROSTATIC LESION (DIL); HIGH PRECISION; INTEROBSERVER DIFFERENCE; NEW APPROACHES; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION THERAPIES; T2-WEIGHTED IMAGING;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOTHERAPY;

DIFFUSION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; EARLY CANCER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67349207854     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Pickett B., Vigneault E., Kurhanewicz J., et al. Static field intensity modulation to treat a dominant intra-prostatic lesion to 90 Gy compared to seven field 3-dimensional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43 (1999) 921-929
2. DiBiase S.J., Hosseinzadeh K., Gullapalli R.P., et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging-guided brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52 (2002) 429-438
3. Pouliot J., Kim Y., Lessard E., et al. Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59 (2004) 1196-1207
4. 1H-spectroscopic MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 (2006) 291-303
5. Nakashima J., Tanimoto A., Imai Y., et al. Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer. Urology 64 (2004) 101-105
6. Hricak H., Choyke P.L., Eberhardt S.C., et al. Imaging prostate cancer: A multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 243 (2007) 28-53
7. Choi Y.J., Kim J.K., Kim N., et al. Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer. RadioGraphics 27 (2007) 63-77
8. Jager G.J., Ruijter E.T., van de Kaa C.A., et al. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: Correlation with histopathologic results. Radiology 203 (1997) 645-652
9. Engelbrecht M.R., Huisman H.J., Laheij R.J., et al. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229 (2003) 248-254
10. Scheidler J., Hricak H., Vigneron D.B., et al. Prostate cancer: Localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging: Clinicopathologic study. Radiology 213 (1999) 473-480
11. Wetter A., Engl T.A., Nadjmabadi D., et al. Combined MRI and MR spectroscopy of the prostate before radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 (2006) 724-730
12. Dhingsa R., Qayyum A., Coakley F.V., et al. Prostate cancer localization with endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging: Effect of clinical data on reader accuracy. Radiology 230 (2004) 215-220
13. Morgan V.A., Kyriazi S., Ashley S.E., et al. Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection. Acta Radiol 48 (2007) 695-703
14. Haider M.A., van der Kwast T.H., Tanguay J., et al. Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 323-328
15. Hricak H., White S., Vigneron D., et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Radiology 193 (1994) 703-709
16. Kozlowski P., Chang S.D., Jones E.C., et al. Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: Correlation with biopsy and histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 24 (2006) 108-113
17. 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 91-98
18. Hosseinzadeh K., and Schwarz S.D. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2004) 654-661
19. Namimoto T., Yamashita Y., Sumi S., et al. Focal liver masses: Characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204 (1997) 739-744
20. Moteki T., and Ishizaka H. Diffusion-weighted EPI of cystic ovarian lesions: Evaluation of cystic contents using apparent diffusion coefficients. J Magn Reson Imaging 12 (2000) 1014-1019
21. Murakami R., Sugahara T., Nakamura H., et al. Malignant supratentorial astrocytoma treated with postoperative radiation therapy: Prognostic value of pretreatment quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 243 (2007) 493-499
22. Goddard P., Leslie A., Jones A., et al. Error in radiology. Br J Radiol 74 (2001) 949-951
23. Sodickson D.K., and McKenzie C.A. A generalized approach to parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 28 (2001) 1629-1643
24. Stamey T.A., Freiha F.S., McNeal J.E., et al. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer 71 (1993) 933-938