Analysis of ISCD-NIST Survey for Bone Health

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 162-169

  Dienstfrey, Andrew ^a   Oreskovic, Tammy ^a   Bennett, Herbert ^b   Hudson, Lawrence ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Semiconductor Electronics Division   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; calibration phantoms; edge detection; reference database; standards

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DEMOGRAPHY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; HEALTH SURVEY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE DATABASE; STANDARD;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; BONE DENSITY; CALIBRATION; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIATION PROTECTION; REFERENCE STANDARDS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIETIES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 67349200784     PISSN: 10946950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Assessing the risk of bone disease and fracture. Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General (2004), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 208 Office of the Surgeon General
2. Bennett H.S., Dienstfrey A., Hudson L.T., et al. Standards and measurements for assessing bone health-workshop report co-sponsored by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). J Clin Densitom 9 (2006) 399-405
3. Arrow K.J. Social choice and individual values. 2nd ed. (1963), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
4. Kitchenham B., and Pfleeger S. Principles of survey research part 6: data analysis. ACM SIGSOFT Software Eng Notes 28 (2003) 24-27
5. Lehmann E.L. Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks. Holden Day series in probability and statistics (1975), Holden Day, San Francisco, CA
6. Saari D.G. Decisions and elections: explaining the unexpected (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
7. Young H.P., and Levenglick A. Consistent extension of condorcets election principle. SIAM J Appl Math 35 (1978) 285-300
8. Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group. 2008 Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level [Technical Report]. World Health Organization, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK.
9. Friedman M. A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. Ann Math Stat 11 (1940) 86-92
10. Kendall M.G., and Smith B.B. The problem of m rankings. Ann Math Stat 10 (1939) 275-287