A method for assessing spectral image utility

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1698-1706

  Stefanou, Marcus S ^a   Kerekes, John P ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hyperspectral imagery; Object detection; Spectral image analysis; Spectral image utility

Indexed keywords

DETECTION ALGORITHM; HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGES; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY; INFORMATION EXPLOITATION; NEW APPROACHES; OBJECT DETECTION; PANCHROMATIC IMAGES; PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS; RECEIVER OPERATING CURVES; SPECTRAL IMAGE ANALYSIS; SPECTRAL IMAGE UTILITY; SPECTRAL IMAGERY; SPECTRAL IMAGES; SUBPIXEL TARGET DETECTION; TARGET DETECTION; TARGET TYPE; USER INFORMATION;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; RADAR TARGET RECOGNITION; REMOTE SENSING; TARGET DRONES; TARGET TRACKING; TARGETS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

ALGORITHM; ASSESSMENT METHOD; DETECTION METHOD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGERY; SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 67349194302     PISSN: 01962892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2006364     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. J. M. Irvine, "National imagery interpretability rating scales (NIIRS): Overview and methodology," in Proc. SPIE - Airborne Reconnaissance XXI, 1997, vol. 3128, pp. 93-103.
2. J. C. Leachtenauer and R. G. Driggers, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Imaging Systems: Modeling and Performance Prediction. Boston, MA: Artech House, 1997, ch. 6.
3. R. G. Driggers, P. Cox, and M. Kelley, "National imagery interpretation rating system and the probabilities of detection, recognition, and identification," Opt. Eng., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1952-1959, Jul. 1997.
4. D. Manolakis, D. Marden, and G. Shaw, "Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications," MIT Linc. Lab. J., vol. 14, no. 1,pp. 79-116, 2003.
5. Image Resolution Assessment and Reporting Standards (IRARS) Committee, Multispectral Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale Reference Guide, 1995, Washington, DC.
6. J. P. Kerekes, "Receiver operating characteristic curve confidence intervals and regions," IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 251-255, Apr. 2008.
7. J. Theiler and B. Foy, "Effect of signal contamination in matched-filter detection of the signal on a cluttered background," IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 98-102, Jan. 2006.
8. C. E. Caefer, S. R. Rotman, J. Silverman, and P. W. Yip, "Algorithms for point target detection in hyperspectral imagery," in Proc. SPIE - Imaging Spectrometry VIII, 2002, vol. 4816, pp. 242-257.
9. J. P. Kerekes and J. E. Baum, "Spectral imaging system analytical model for subpixel object detection," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1088-1101, May 2002.
10. D. Manolakis and G. Shaw, "Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications," IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 29-43, Jan. 2002.
11. P. Bajorski, "Analytical comparison of the matched filter and orthogonal subspace projection detectors for hyperspectral images," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2394-2402, Jul. 2007.
12. W. H. Farrand and J. C. Harsanyi, "Mapping the distribution of mine tailings in the Coeur d'Alene River Valley, Idaho, through the use of a constrained energy minimization technique," Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 64-76, Jan. 1997.
13. D. Manolakis, "Taxonomy of detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications," Opt. Eng., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 066403-1-066403-11, Jun. 2005.
14. S. Kraut and L. Scharf, "The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2538-2541, Sep. 1999.
15. S. Kraut, L. Scharf, and L. McWhorter, "Adaptive subspace detectors," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 2001.
16. C. E. Metz, "ROC methodology in radiologic imaging," Invest. Radiol., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 720-733, Sep. 1986.
17. M. S. Stefanou, "Spectral image utility for target detection applications," Ph.D. dissertation, Rochester Inst. Technol., Rochester, NY, 2008.